How to make use of WITH in PostgreSQL to reduce query cost












0















I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
(select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



WITH metric_counts AS (
SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
f.t_id=b.t_id
)
SELECT
b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
FROM twitter_users as a
LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
metric_counts.eng_rate;


The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



Here is the Query cost of WITH query



HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










share|improve this question

























  • Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    1 hour ago
















0















I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
(select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



WITH metric_counts AS (
SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
f.t_id=b.t_id
)
SELECT
b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
FROM twitter_users as a
LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
metric_counts.eng_rate;


The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



Here is the Query cost of WITH query



HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










share|improve this question

























  • Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    1 hour ago














0












0








0








I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
(select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



WITH metric_counts AS (
SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
f.t_id=b.t_id
)
SELECT
b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
FROM twitter_users as a
LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
metric_counts.eng_rate;


The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



Here is the Query cost of WITH query



HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










share|improve this question
















I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
(select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



WITH metric_counts AS (
SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
f.t_id=b.t_id
)
SELECT
b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
FROM twitter_users as a
LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
metric_counts.eng_rate;


The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



Here is the Query cost of WITH query



HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.







postgresql-9.4 cte






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 mins ago







bunny sunny

















asked 3 hours ago









bunny sunnybunny sunny

62




62













  • Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    1 hour ago



















  • Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    1 hour ago

















Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

– a_horse_with_no_name
1 hour ago





Please edit your question and add the execution plan generated using explain (analyze, buffers) (not just a "simple" explain) as formatted text, no screen shots please. Or upload the plan to explain.depesz.com

– a_horse_with_no_name
1 hour ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231515%2fhow-to-make-use-of-with-in-postgresql-to-reduce-query-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231515%2fhow-to-make-use-of-with-in-postgresql-to-reduce-query-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

Single-Malt-Whisky

Czorneboh