Running REINDEX in a live environment (POSTGRESQL 9.6.10)












0















I have a live app where I have some big tables (~100+M rows), which I recently truncated to ~20M rows. One behavior I've noticed after making the said change is that DB response time has escalated in some cases (SELECT queries highly affected). I've been doing research on why this could have happened.



One thing that has popped up is that I may need to reindex the indexes on these tables - original indexes may have become fragmented/unoptimized. However, it being a live environment, that could impose write locks. I've read that a better way to do this is:




  1. Create an index concurrently with a different name,

  2. Drop the original index

  3. Rename the new one to the old one


Being an accidental DBA, I want to be sure about how to do this. So here's an example of how I'll go about reindexing one index.



Please correct me (or improve my approach) if you feel something's left wanting:



Imagine the following table with 4 indexes:



                                      Table "public.links_publicreply"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-----------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
id | integer | not null default nextval('links_publicreply_id_seq'::regclass)
submitted_by_id | integer | not null
answer_to_id | integer | not null
submitted_on | timestamp with time zone | not null
description | text | not null
category | character varying(20) | not null
seen | boolean | not null
Indexes:
"links_publicreply_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"id_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id, id DESC)
"links_publicreply_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id)
"links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id)
Foreign-key constraints:
"links_publicreply_answer_to_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (answer_to_id) REFERENCES links_link(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
"links_publicreply_submitted_by_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by_id) REFERENCES auth_user(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
Referenced by:
TABLE "links_report" CONSTRAINT "links_report_which_publicreply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_publicreply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
TABLE "links_seen" CONSTRAINT "links_seen_which_reply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
TABLE "links_link" CONSTRAINT "publicreplyposter_link_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (latest_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE


Starting with "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id). I'll try:



1) CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY temp_index ON links_publicreply (submitted_by_id DESC)



2) Then I'll run the following:



BEGIN;
DROP INDEX links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
ALTER INDEX temp_index RENAME TO links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
COMMIT;




Does that sound right? If not, please correct/improve as necessary.



Follow-up question: Should I attempt to re-index the primary key index in similar fashion?









share



























    0















    I have a live app where I have some big tables (~100+M rows), which I recently truncated to ~20M rows. One behavior I've noticed after making the said change is that DB response time has escalated in some cases (SELECT queries highly affected). I've been doing research on why this could have happened.



    One thing that has popped up is that I may need to reindex the indexes on these tables - original indexes may have become fragmented/unoptimized. However, it being a live environment, that could impose write locks. I've read that a better way to do this is:




    1. Create an index concurrently with a different name,

    2. Drop the original index

    3. Rename the new one to the old one


    Being an accidental DBA, I want to be sure about how to do this. So here's an example of how I'll go about reindexing one index.



    Please correct me (or improve my approach) if you feel something's left wanting:



    Imagine the following table with 4 indexes:



                                          Table "public.links_publicreply"
    Column | Type | Modifiers
    -----------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
    id | integer | not null default nextval('links_publicreply_id_seq'::regclass)
    submitted_by_id | integer | not null
    answer_to_id | integer | not null
    submitted_on | timestamp with time zone | not null
    description | text | not null
    category | character varying(20) | not null
    seen | boolean | not null
    Indexes:
    "links_publicreply_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
    "id_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id, id DESC)
    "links_publicreply_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id)
    "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id)
    Foreign-key constraints:
    "links_publicreply_answer_to_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (answer_to_id) REFERENCES links_link(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
    "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by_id) REFERENCES auth_user(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
    Referenced by:
    TABLE "links_report" CONSTRAINT "links_report_which_publicreply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_publicreply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
    TABLE "links_seen" CONSTRAINT "links_seen_which_reply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
    TABLE "links_link" CONSTRAINT "publicreplyposter_link_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (latest_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE


    Starting with "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id). I'll try:



    1) CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY temp_index ON links_publicreply (submitted_by_id DESC)



    2) Then I'll run the following:



    BEGIN;
    DROP INDEX links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
    ALTER INDEX temp_index RENAME TO links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
    COMMIT;




    Does that sound right? If not, please correct/improve as necessary.



    Follow-up question: Should I attempt to re-index the primary key index in similar fashion?









    share

























      0












      0








      0








      I have a live app where I have some big tables (~100+M rows), which I recently truncated to ~20M rows. One behavior I've noticed after making the said change is that DB response time has escalated in some cases (SELECT queries highly affected). I've been doing research on why this could have happened.



      One thing that has popped up is that I may need to reindex the indexes on these tables - original indexes may have become fragmented/unoptimized. However, it being a live environment, that could impose write locks. I've read that a better way to do this is:




      1. Create an index concurrently with a different name,

      2. Drop the original index

      3. Rename the new one to the old one


      Being an accidental DBA, I want to be sure about how to do this. So here's an example of how I'll go about reindexing one index.



      Please correct me (or improve my approach) if you feel something's left wanting:



      Imagine the following table with 4 indexes:



                                            Table "public.links_publicreply"
      Column | Type | Modifiers
      -----------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
      id | integer | not null default nextval('links_publicreply_id_seq'::regclass)
      submitted_by_id | integer | not null
      answer_to_id | integer | not null
      submitted_on | timestamp with time zone | not null
      description | text | not null
      category | character varying(20) | not null
      seen | boolean | not null
      Indexes:
      "links_publicreply_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
      "id_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id, id DESC)
      "links_publicreply_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id)
      "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id)
      Foreign-key constraints:
      "links_publicreply_answer_to_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (answer_to_id) REFERENCES links_link(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by_id) REFERENCES auth_user(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      Referenced by:
      TABLE "links_report" CONSTRAINT "links_report_which_publicreply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_publicreply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      TABLE "links_seen" CONSTRAINT "links_seen_which_reply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      TABLE "links_link" CONSTRAINT "publicreplyposter_link_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (latest_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE


      Starting with "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id). I'll try:



      1) CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY temp_index ON links_publicreply (submitted_by_id DESC)



      2) Then I'll run the following:



      BEGIN;
      DROP INDEX links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
      ALTER INDEX temp_index RENAME TO links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
      COMMIT;




      Does that sound right? If not, please correct/improve as necessary.



      Follow-up question: Should I attempt to re-index the primary key index in similar fashion?









      share














      I have a live app where I have some big tables (~100+M rows), which I recently truncated to ~20M rows. One behavior I've noticed after making the said change is that DB response time has escalated in some cases (SELECT queries highly affected). I've been doing research on why this could have happened.



      One thing that has popped up is that I may need to reindex the indexes on these tables - original indexes may have become fragmented/unoptimized. However, it being a live environment, that could impose write locks. I've read that a better way to do this is:




      1. Create an index concurrently with a different name,

      2. Drop the original index

      3. Rename the new one to the old one


      Being an accidental DBA, I want to be sure about how to do this. So here's an example of how I'll go about reindexing one index.



      Please correct me (or improve my approach) if you feel something's left wanting:



      Imagine the following table with 4 indexes:



                                            Table "public.links_publicreply"
      Column | Type | Modifiers
      -----------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
      id | integer | not null default nextval('links_publicreply_id_seq'::regclass)
      submitted_by_id | integer | not null
      answer_to_id | integer | not null
      submitted_on | timestamp with time zone | not null
      description | text | not null
      category | character varying(20) | not null
      seen | boolean | not null
      Indexes:
      "links_publicreply_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
      "id_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id, id DESC)
      "links_publicreply_answer_to_id" btree (answer_to_id)
      "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id)
      Foreign-key constraints:
      "links_publicreply_answer_to_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (answer_to_id) REFERENCES links_link(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (submitted_by_id) REFERENCES auth_user(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      Referenced by:
      TABLE "links_report" CONSTRAINT "links_report_which_publicreply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_publicreply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      TABLE "links_seen" CONSTRAINT "links_seen_which_reply_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (which_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
      TABLE "links_link" CONSTRAINT "publicreplyposter_link_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (latest_reply_id) REFERENCES links_publicreply(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE


      Starting with "links_publicreply_submitted_by_id" btree (submitted_by_id). I'll try:



      1) CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY temp_index ON links_publicreply (submitted_by_id DESC)



      2) Then I'll run the following:



      BEGIN;
      DROP INDEX links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
      ALTER INDEX temp_index RENAME TO links_publicreply_submitted_by_id;
      COMMIT;




      Does that sound right? If not, please correct/improve as necessary.



      Follow-up question: Should I attempt to re-index the primary key index in similar fashion?







      postgresql index





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 9 mins ago









      Hassan BaigHassan Baig

      50511024




      50511024






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229580%2frunning-reindex-in-a-live-environment-postgresql-9-6-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229580%2frunning-reindex-in-a-live-environment-postgresql-9-6-10%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

          Single-Malt-Whisky

          Czorneboh