Logistic function with a slope but no asymptotes?












6












$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?






sigmoid-curve







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    14 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    9 hours ago


















6












$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?






sigmoid-curve







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    14 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    9 hours ago
















6












6








6





$begingroup$


The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?






sigmoid-curve







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The logistic function has an output range 0 to 1, and asymptotic slope is zero on both sides.



What is an alternative to a logistic function that doesn't flatten out completely at its ends? Whose asymptotic slopes are approaching zero but not zero, and the range is infinite?






sigmoid-curve




sigmoid-curve






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 21 mins ago









Neil G

9,79012970




9,79012970










asked 15 hours ago









AksakalAksakal

39k452120




39k452120












  • $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    14 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    9 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
    $endgroup$
    – Aksakal
    14 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    14 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
    $endgroup$
    – steveo'america
    14 hours ago








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    9 hours ago


















$begingroup$
The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
$endgroup$
– jld
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
The title seems to disagree with how i read your question -- is this new function required to have asymptotes or not?
$endgroup$
– jld
14 hours ago












$begingroup$
Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
Basically I want a function that looks like sigmoid but has a slope
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
14 hours ago












$begingroup$
I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
$endgroup$
– jld
14 hours ago




$begingroup$
I just updated -- is that more what you mean? I'm still not sure what you mean by a "slope". Do you mean a sigmoid shape but with $lim_{xtopminfty}f(x) = pm infty$, i.e. it doesn't flatten out into horizontal asymptotes at $|x|$ grows?
$endgroup$
– jld
14 hours ago




4




4




$begingroup$
$operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
$endgroup$
– steveo'america
14 hours ago






$begingroup$
$operatorname{sign}(x)log(1 + |x|)$?
$endgroup$
– steveo'america
14 hours ago






2




2




$begingroup$
Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
9 hours ago






$begingroup$
Beginning of the decade called, it wants its neural network activation functions back. (Sorry bad joke, but realistically this is why people moved to ReLUs) (+1 though, relevant question)
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
9 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
$$
text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
$$



This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
asinh



I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.




Original answer



$newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
$$
lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
$$



Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
$$
exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
$$
and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
$$
f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
$$ work?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    12 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    7 hours ago



















6












$begingroup$

You could just add a term to a logistic function:



$$
f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
$$



The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



Sigmoid






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    5 hours ago



















5












$begingroup$

I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
$$
f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
$$
which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398551%2flogistic-function-with-a-slope-but-no-asymptotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8












    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.




    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$
    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$     work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      7 hours ago
















    8












    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.




    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$
    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$     work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      7 hours ago














    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.




    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$
    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$     work?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Initially I was thinking you did want the horizontal asymptotes at $0$ still; I moved my original answer to the end. If you instead want $lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = pminfty$ then would something like the inverse hyperbolic sine work?
    $$
    text{asinh}(x) = logleft(x + sqrt{1 + x^2}right)
    $$



    This is unbounded but grows like $log$ for large $|x|$ and looks like
    asinh



    I like this function a lot as a data transformation when I've got heavy tails but possibly zeros or negative values.



    Another nice thing about this function is that $text{asinh}'(x) = frac{1}{sqrt{1+x^2}}$ so it has a nice simple derivative.




    Original answer



    $newcommand{e}{varepsilon}$Let $f : mathbb Rtomathbb R$ be our function and we'll assume
    $$
    lim_{xtopm infty} f(x) = 0.
    $$



    Suppose $f$ is continuous. Fix $e > 0$. From the asymptotes we have
    $$
    exists x_1 : x < x_1 implies |f(x)| < e
    $$
    and analogously there's an $x_2$ such that $x > x_2 implies |f(x)| < e$. Therefore outside of $[x_1,x_2]$ $f$ is within $(-e, e)$. And $[x_1,x_2]$ is a compact interval so by continuity $f$ is bounded on it.



    This means that any such function can't be continuous. Would something like
    $$
    f(x) = begin{cases} x^{-1} & xneq 0 \ 0 & x = 0end{cases}
    $$     work?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 12 hours ago

























    answered 14 hours ago









    jldjld

    12.3k23352




    12.3k23352








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      7 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
      $endgroup$
      – Sycorax
      12 hours ago












    • $begingroup$
      @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
      $endgroup$
      – jld
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
      $endgroup$
      – Ingolifs
      7 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    12 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    The "Related" threads include this unanswered question, in case anyone else has asked themselves the natural followup "what happens if you use asinh in a neural network?" stats.stackexchange.com/questions/359245/…
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    12 hours ago














    $begingroup$
    @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    10 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Sycorax thanks, i was wondering about that
    $endgroup$
    – jld
    10 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    My ears did indeed prick up. I have in the past found asinh() useful when you want to 'do log stuff' to both positive and negative numbers. It also gets around the quandry you can get in, where you need to do a log transform on data with zeros and have to judge an appropriate value of $a$ for $log(x + a)$
    $endgroup$
    – Ingolifs
    7 hours ago













    6












    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      5 hours ago
















    6












    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      5 hours ago














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You could just add a term to a logistic function:



    $$
    f(x; a, b, c, d, e)=frac{a}{1+bexp(-cx)} + dx + e
    $$



    The asymptotes will have slopes $d$.



    Here is an example with $a=10, b = 1, c = 2, d = frac{1}{20}, e = -5$:



    Sigmoid







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 13 hours ago









    COOLSerdashCOOLSerdash

    16.4k75293




    16.4k75293












    • $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      5 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
      $endgroup$
      – user1717828
      5 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I think this answer is the best because if you zoom out far enough it's just a straight line with a little wiggle in the middle. Gives the most intuitive behavior at large x but retains the sigmoid shape.
    $endgroup$
    – user1717828
    5 hours ago











    5












    $begingroup$

    I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
    $$
    f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
    $$
    which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
      $$
      f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
      $$
      which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
        $$
        f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
        $$
        which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I will go ahead and turn the comment into an answer. I suggest
        $$
        f(x) = operatorname{sign}(x)log{left(1 + |x|right)},
        $$
        which has slope tending towards zero, but is unbounded.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 12 hours ago









        steveo'americasteveo'america

        23318




        23318






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398551%2flogistic-function-with-a-slope-but-no-asymptotes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

            Image
            In der Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland sind alle denkmalgeschützten Bauten der Stadt Friedland (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) und ihrer Ortsteile aufgelistet. Grundlage ist die Veröffentlichung der Denkmalliste des Landkreises Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (Auszug) vom 28. September 2016. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen 1.1 Friedland 1.2 Bresewitz 1.3 Brohm 1.4 Cosa 1.5 Dishley 1.6 Dishley-Ausbau 1.7 Eichhorst 1.8 Glienke 1.9 Heinrichshöh 1.10 Heinrichswalde 1.11 Jatzke 1.12 Jatzke-Meierei 1.13 Liepen 1.14 Ramelow 1.15 Schwanbeck 2 Vorgesehener Denkmalbereich 3 Quelle 4 Weblinks Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen | Friedland | ID Lage Bezeichnung Beschreibung Bild 281 An der Kleinbahn 2 Windmühle mit Umgang 282 Anklamer Straße alter Friedhof mit Portalwand 282 Anklamer Straße drei Erbbegräbnissen und Gräbern u. a. H.A. Riemann 284
            Read more

            Single-Malt-Whisky

            Image
            Fünf verschiedene schottische Single-Malt-Whiskys Als Single-Malt-Whisky oder kürzer Single Malt werden Whiskys bezeichnet, die zwei besondere Bedingungen erfüllen: Sie stammen zum ersten aus einer einzigen Brennerei, sind also kein Verschnitt aus mehreren Whiskysorten (daher Single , deutsch: einzeln). Zum zweiten wird als Getreide ausschließlich gemälzte Gerste verwendet (deswegen Malt , deutsch: Malz). Der Zusatz Single Malt wird als Prädikat verstanden, die so ausgezeichneten Whiskys sind in aller Regel besonders hochwertig. Hinzu kommt ihre besonders lange Lagerung, die Reifungszeit währt oft ein Jahrzehnt und länger. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Allgemeines 2 Herkunftsländer 2.1 Schottland 2.2 Irland 2.3 Japan 2.4 Kontinentaleuropa 3 Produktionsschritte 3.1 Mälzen 3.2 Brauen 3.3 Brennen 3.4 Reifung und Finish 3.5 Abfüllung 4 Altersangaben 5 Lagerung von Whiskyflaschen 6 Geschmacksklassifikation 7 Sonstig
            Read more

            Czorneboh

            Image
            Dieser Artikel erläutert den Berg Czorneboh, für die Gottheit siehe Czorneboh (Gottheit). Czorneboh Čornobóh Berggasthof mit Turm Höhe 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] Lage Freistaat Sachsen, Deutschland Gebirge Lausitzer Bergland Dominanz 15,4 km →  Kottmar Koordinaten 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O 51.119722222222 14.525194444444 555.7 Koordinaten: 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O Gestein Granodiorit Besonderheiten Aussichtsturm Czorneboh Der Czorneboh , obersorbisch Čornobóh , ist ein Berg zwischen Hochkirch und Cunewalde in der Oberlausitz. Er gehört zu der südöstlich von Bautzen gelegenen Czorneboh-Bergkette und ist mit einer Höhe von 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] der höchste Punkt dieses Ausläufers des Lausitzer Berglandes. Er leitet als Landschaftselement die wellige Granitlandschaft der Lausitzer Vorbergzone ein. Der Gipfel des Czorneboh liegt in der Gemarkung Meschwitz (Gemeinde Hochkirch), die Czornebohbaude jedoch
            Read more