What are the main differences between the original Stargate SG-1 and the Final Cut edition?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I just got Amazon Prime video so I can rewatch the Stargate series. I remember things a little differently then I am seeing it.
For instance, I distinctly remember Carter saying (when first getting to Abidos)
we had to MacGyver a bunch of supercomputers together
as a joke to Richard Dean Anderson. However, she says jerry-rig instead. Is that something that they changed or am I remembering it all wrong?
Are there any other big changes done that I will be surprised at?
stargate stargate-sg1
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I just got Amazon Prime video so I can rewatch the Stargate series. I remember things a little differently then I am seeing it.
For instance, I distinctly remember Carter saying (when first getting to Abidos)
we had to MacGyver a bunch of supercomputers together
as a joke to Richard Dean Anderson. However, she says jerry-rig instead. Is that something that they changed or am I remembering it all wrong?
Are there any other big changes done that I will be surprised at?
stargate stargate-sg1
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago
add a comment |
I just got Amazon Prime video so I can rewatch the Stargate series. I remember things a little differently then I am seeing it.
For instance, I distinctly remember Carter saying (when first getting to Abidos)
we had to MacGyver a bunch of supercomputers together
as a joke to Richard Dean Anderson. However, she says jerry-rig instead. Is that something that they changed or am I remembering it all wrong?
Are there any other big changes done that I will be surprised at?
stargate stargate-sg1
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I just got Amazon Prime video so I can rewatch the Stargate series. I remember things a little differently then I am seeing it.
For instance, I distinctly remember Carter saying (when first getting to Abidos)
we had to MacGyver a bunch of supercomputers together
as a joke to Richard Dean Anderson. However, she says jerry-rig instead. Is that something that they changed or am I remembering it all wrong?
Are there any other big changes done that I will be surprised at?
stargate stargate-sg1
stargate stargate-sg1
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
edited 17 mins ago
Machavity
25.7k577144
25.7k577144
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
asked 9 hours ago
MatthewMatthew
411
411
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Matthew is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago
add a comment |
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You likely watched the "Final Cut" version. The special effects and score were largely redone, and various scenes cut (including one instance of full-frontal nudity) mostly to get it from an R to a PG.
Dialogue changes were mostly for Sam Carter, to make her characterisation more consistent with later episodes. As well as the MacGyver reference, the infamous "my reproductive organs are on the inside" line was removed.
A few scenes were also extended to fix other issues, such not redialling an outgoing wormhole in the intro.
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Matthew is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209445%2fwhat-are-the-main-differences-between-the-original-stargate-sg-1-and-the-final-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You likely watched the "Final Cut" version. The special effects and score were largely redone, and various scenes cut (including one instance of full-frontal nudity) mostly to get it from an R to a PG.
Dialogue changes were mostly for Sam Carter, to make her characterisation more consistent with later episodes. As well as the MacGyver reference, the infamous "my reproductive organs are on the inside" line was removed.
A few scenes were also extended to fix other issues, such not redialling an outgoing wormhole in the intro.
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
You likely watched the "Final Cut" version. The special effects and score were largely redone, and various scenes cut (including one instance of full-frontal nudity) mostly to get it from an R to a PG.
Dialogue changes were mostly for Sam Carter, to make her characterisation more consistent with later episodes. As well as the MacGyver reference, the infamous "my reproductive organs are on the inside" line was removed.
A few scenes were also extended to fix other issues, such not redialling an outgoing wormhole in the intro.
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
You likely watched the "Final Cut" version. The special effects and score were largely redone, and various scenes cut (including one instance of full-frontal nudity) mostly to get it from an R to a PG.
Dialogue changes were mostly for Sam Carter, to make her characterisation more consistent with later episodes. As well as the MacGyver reference, the infamous "my reproductive organs are on the inside" line was removed.
A few scenes were also extended to fix other issues, such not redialling an outgoing wormhole in the intro.
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
You likely watched the "Final Cut" version. The special effects and score were largely redone, and various scenes cut (including one instance of full-frontal nudity) mostly to get it from an R to a PG.
Dialogue changes were mostly for Sam Carter, to make her characterisation more consistent with later episodes. As well as the MacGyver reference, the infamous "my reproductive organs are on the inside" line was removed.
A few scenes were also extended to fix other issues, such not redialling an outgoing wormhole in the intro.
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
answered 9 hours ago
OrangeDogOrangeDog
2,41721423
2,41721423
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
So why did they decide to change it?
– Matthew
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
@Matthew ... to make it better?
– OrangeDog
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
Lol ok. I really liked the comments by carter but I guess that's better now. Thanks so much btw for your answer I was thinking I was having a Mandela effect moment but no they just changed it cause they wanted to be a George Lucas. I do like the better quality widescreen but it just kinda sucks they had to change the dialogue.
– Matthew
9 hours ago
1
1
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
@Matthew - It has been a year or so since I logged into the new stargatecommand.co launch that MGM made, but the few episodes I watched there were all the originals. It is no longer a flat rate to access content however (it started as a 40 dollar flat rate to access the new mini series and all the old content). I believe I noticed the other day when i tried to log in that it is now a 20 dollar monthly fee... Assuming they have not updated content there it should still be all the originals. Your only other option is going to be looking for discs online. There are boxed sets...
– Odin1806
8 hours ago
2
2
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
If you guys could take it to chat I won't have to get loads of notifications.
– OrangeDog
8 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
Matthew is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matthew is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matthew is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matthew is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209445%2fwhat-are-the-main-differences-between-the-original-stargate-sg-1-and-the-final-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
google.com/amp/s/www.gateworld.net/news/2009/07/…
– Valorum
9 hours ago
Hi there. I've taken the liberty to rewrite that a bit to make it a better fit for the site, by asking about the differences only; recommendations on where to watch one version or another are off-topic. If you want to focus more on one aspect or another (to narrow the scope a but), feel free to edit the question further.
– Jenayah
9 hours ago
BW: Listen, there's a change… (Pause to listen to dialog)… took out the MacGyver thing. RDA: Yeah! Very nice. BW: You know why? RDA: Unh uh. BW: Cause now you're Jack O'Neill. Why, why back-reference two series ago? RDA: Hmmm, don't know. BW: Do you want it back? RDA: Do I want it back? No. BW: I can do it again, but I can't do it for another 10 years. (Laughter) RDA: Ok. I'll wait that decade. BW: Ok. (Laughter) RDA: I have no problems with it disappearing. I think it was for the audience primarily anyway. - tinyurl.com/yylakkw9
– Valorum
9 hours ago