How to increase a planet's gravity












5












$begingroup$


I am building a sci fi universe where humans have colonized the moons of Jupiter. They are very small and thus have low gravity. In fact, some of them have gravity equal to less than 5% of Earth.



What would be a believable sci fi way to artificially increase the surface gravity to make the moons more hospitable?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


I am building a sci fi universe where humans have colonized the moons of Jupiter. They are very small and thus have low gravity. In fact, some of them have gravity equal to less than 5% of Earth.



What would be a believable sci fi way to artificially increase the surface gravity to make the moons more hospitable?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


I am building a sci fi universe where humans have colonized the moons of Jupiter. They are very small and thus have low gravity. In fact, some of them have gravity equal to less than 5% of Earth.



What would be a believable sci fi way to artificially increase the surface gravity to make the moons more hospitable?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am building a sci fi universe where humans have colonized the moons of Jupiter. They are very small and thus have low gravity. In fact, some of them have gravity equal to less than 5% of Earth.



What would be a believable sci fi way to artificially increase the surface gravity to make the moons more hospitable?







gravity






share|improve this question









New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Monica Cellio

12.4k653116




12.4k653116






New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









DilettanterDilettanter

282




282




New contributor




Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Dilettanter is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – Mr.J
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
    $endgroup$
    – Dilettanter
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
$endgroup$
– Mr.J
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to Worldbuilding S.E! Do I understand correctly your question, you want your moon's gravity to increase artificially right?
$endgroup$
– Mr.J
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
$endgroup$
– Dilettanter
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@mr.j that is correct! Thank you for the clarification
$endgroup$
– Dilettanter
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
$endgroup$
– Mr.J
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Sadly though, the most believable sci fi way of increase a space object's gravity is by creasing its mass, making sure that the core also grow in size too, I'm not too sure what kind of satellite provide greater gravity (e.g earthlike planet with iron core, gas giant with ice core or a water giant with a rocky core, etc etc...). It would be better to if we know why would you want a planet or a satellite to increase its gravity, thank you and good luck!
$endgroup$
– Mr.J
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
$endgroup$
– Dilettanter
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Because low gravity makes habitability much more difficult. And if we must colonize the gallelian moons, then how could we overcome their weak gravity? Even something like "walk around with magnets on your feet on magnetic floors" is one way around it, albiet a rather lame one.
$endgroup$
– Dilettanter
3 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The answer, unfortunately, is "artificial gravity," and don't explain it.



Speaking from a purely scientific perspective there is no known substitute for mass. The only known way to cause gravity is to have mass (or an ungodly amount of energy which is equivalent to said mass). We simply don't know of anything else.



In science fiction landscapes, artificial gravity is simply too useful to not have. We use it all over. Nearly every major science fiction show set on a spaceship has it. Only a handful dare to deal with microgravity in its true form. There's plenty of handwavy reasons for it, but most shows seem to merely assume that artificial gravity works, and move on with the plot. Some will rely on centrifugal force to create the artificial gravity, but that only applies on stations where your people operate on the inside. Since you're on the outside of a planet, that won't work. That being said, if you were operating a mining expedition, you might be able to spin the planet and have "gravity" face the other way (for a short while, before the rocks of the planet break up and fly off).



If you want to add some pseudoscience, feel free to say something about gravitons. That's the hypothetical particle in QM that is supposed to be responsible for gravity. However, nobody has been able to figure out how to work the math for gravitons, so we don't even know how to look for them, much less create them. Still, as far as believability goes, it's at least the name scientists use when exploring gravity.



And besides, microgravity is pretty cool when you really get down to it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Two Options



    Actual Increased Gravity



    Gravity is a product of mass and in the case of a human and a moon, to make the gravitational attraction increase one may either increase the mass of the human or the mass of moon.




    1. Increasing the mass of the moon would create a situation most similar to "Earth conditions." One could do this by dumping mass on the outside, or by removing parts of the innards and replacing with more dense material. Either of these options are well outside the capabilities of our current civilization, and even for a civilization that was ready to colonize the Jovian system this would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive or impossible. A bigger problem would be that increasing the mass of Jovian moons would change the orbits of said moons. The largest Jovian moons orbit in stable resonance and adding mass to some/all of them would destroy this stable condition, leading to more erratic orbits and possible collisions between moons or with Jupiter.

    2. Increasing the mass of the astronaut/settler is less commonly suggested. For instance, if a settler on some moon experiences 1/3g, and that person wears garments that effectively distribute double their weight across their body, they will feel 1g in their normal movement such as walking or moving their arms. This will not help with things like changing in the shape of the eyes or deterioration of the heart, but it would help a lot with muscle atrophy. This would also not help with other aspects of low-g environments such as drinking fluids, moving objects, etc. For more detail see this.


    Artificial Gravity



    By artificial gravity I mean simulation of gravity via an "apparent" force. This is most commonly done in science fiction by having people live in rotating habitats shaped as a cylinder or wheel. The (centrifugal) force is outward against the outer edge, which essentially become a floor that curves around. You can visualize and learn more about these schemes here and here. This could be done either on the surface or in orbit:




    1. On the surface, the only way to keep the artificial gravity constant would be to rotate with a rotational axis perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise when rotating away from the surface one would feel lighter, then heavier as they approached the surface again (ferris wheel configuration). So if rotating with an axis perpendicular to the surface (merry go round configuration), combined with the moon's gravity, this would make the "floors" of your rotating habitat feel tilted. This is because force would be generated outward (parallel to the surface) but the gravity field would act downward (toward the surface). If you're interested I can try and draw a vector diagram to demonstrate this. The point is there's not really a perfect way to do this at the surface.

    2. In orbit, a space habitat would be in freefall, thus experiencing what we call zero-g (like on the ISS). In this case, a rotating habitat could provide a constant 1g by spinning at the right speed for its size. If reaching the surface for mining/farming/building is necessary, it can be done by shuttling or using some future tech such as a space elevator.

    3. There is a third option that I think is even less likely but possible. Habitats could be built in the interior, with the floor being the outer surface (think like being upside down in a cave). The moon could then be accelerated rotationally, until the spin simulates an outward force of 1g plus whatever the moon's gravity is. This would allow for living in subsurface dwellings at 1g, but there are big issues: First, the energy required to increase the moon's spin this much would be massive, and it's unclear how exactly this would be done besides literally strapping rockets to the moon. Second, the outward force would be most apparent at the equator, and go to zero at the poles. So in a strip at the equator this is workable, but as one moves away in latitude the effect decreases noticeably. Third, anyone on the outer surface would feel an outward force of 1g (think like if gravity on Earth reversed and you had to hang on to keep from flying off). This relates to the former issue in that it would be most drastic at the equator and not apparent at the poles. Fourth, it's up for debate whether a moon would even stay in one piece rotating fast enough to provide 1g outward. The whole thing might fly off in a bunch of chunks. This idea is commonly proposed for colonizing small asteroids, but would not be a great idea for, say, Io. Though maybe for some of the much smaller outer moons this would be more valid.


    What's Likely?



    It seems that you really want settlers to live in 1g on the surface of these Jovian moons. It is really unlikely that this setting would ever happen without handwaving some material that "magically" increases density/gravity. In all likelihood your settlers would settle (hah) for living in reduced gravity on the surface and deal with the health effects, or live in 1g in a space habitat and transfer to the surface when necessary.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      You would have to increase the planet's mass or core; I'm not sure how you could manage to do that though.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$





















        0












        $begingroup$

        The surface gravity of a spherical body is governed by the following equation:



        $$
        g propto frac {m}{r^2}
        $$



        Thus, there are two ways to increase the gravity.




        1. Add more mass $m$.

        2. Decrease the radius $r$.


        Adding more mass



        If a moon has 5% of the surface gravity of the Earth then you'll have to add many more moons of material in order to increase the gravity to Earth levels. At this point you're no longer modifying the existant moon. You're building a new bigger moon.



        Decreasing the radius



        You're better off decreasing the radius. If you decrease a moon's radius while keeping the mass constant then the surface gravity increases. You can do this by transmuting the moon's light elements into denser elements. Human beings can already transmute some elements on a small scale. If generalized to the right elements and scaled up, then this process could increase the surface gravity of a planet or moon.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$





















          0












          $begingroup$

          Option 1:



          Depleted uranium shell on the moon's surface, of sufficient thickness to add the mass required, but that would add cost to whatever activity needs to break the surface. Plus the increase radiation hazard, but you're on a moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field. Alternately, a better, but more expensive, solution would be to drive shafts down to the core of the moon and dump the depleted uranium there.



          Option 2:



          Rather than increasing gravity across the entire surface of the moon, do it only in enclosed, inhabited biospheres. Use high pressure pumps to circulate air by drawing in in from the bottom and releasing it at the top of the biosphere dome. The atmospheric pressure plus the downward velocity of the air should act as a suitable simulation of gravity.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "579"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Dilettanter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138191%2fhow-to-increase-a-planets-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes








            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The answer, unfortunately, is "artificial gravity," and don't explain it.



            Speaking from a purely scientific perspective there is no known substitute for mass. The only known way to cause gravity is to have mass (or an ungodly amount of energy which is equivalent to said mass). We simply don't know of anything else.



            In science fiction landscapes, artificial gravity is simply too useful to not have. We use it all over. Nearly every major science fiction show set on a spaceship has it. Only a handful dare to deal with microgravity in its true form. There's plenty of handwavy reasons for it, but most shows seem to merely assume that artificial gravity works, and move on with the plot. Some will rely on centrifugal force to create the artificial gravity, but that only applies on stations where your people operate on the inside. Since you're on the outside of a planet, that won't work. That being said, if you were operating a mining expedition, you might be able to spin the planet and have "gravity" face the other way (for a short while, before the rocks of the planet break up and fly off).



            If you want to add some pseudoscience, feel free to say something about gravitons. That's the hypothetical particle in QM that is supposed to be responsible for gravity. However, nobody has been able to figure out how to work the math for gravitons, so we don't even know how to look for them, much less create them. Still, as far as believability goes, it's at least the name scientists use when exploring gravity.



            And besides, microgravity is pretty cool when you really get down to it.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              The answer, unfortunately, is "artificial gravity," and don't explain it.



              Speaking from a purely scientific perspective there is no known substitute for mass. The only known way to cause gravity is to have mass (or an ungodly amount of energy which is equivalent to said mass). We simply don't know of anything else.



              In science fiction landscapes, artificial gravity is simply too useful to not have. We use it all over. Nearly every major science fiction show set on a spaceship has it. Only a handful dare to deal with microgravity in its true form. There's plenty of handwavy reasons for it, but most shows seem to merely assume that artificial gravity works, and move on with the plot. Some will rely on centrifugal force to create the artificial gravity, but that only applies on stations where your people operate on the inside. Since you're on the outside of a planet, that won't work. That being said, if you were operating a mining expedition, you might be able to spin the planet and have "gravity" face the other way (for a short while, before the rocks of the planet break up and fly off).



              If you want to add some pseudoscience, feel free to say something about gravitons. That's the hypothetical particle in QM that is supposed to be responsible for gravity. However, nobody has been able to figure out how to work the math for gravitons, so we don't even know how to look for them, much less create them. Still, as far as believability goes, it's at least the name scientists use when exploring gravity.



              And besides, microgravity is pretty cool when you really get down to it.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The answer, unfortunately, is "artificial gravity," and don't explain it.



                Speaking from a purely scientific perspective there is no known substitute for mass. The only known way to cause gravity is to have mass (or an ungodly amount of energy which is equivalent to said mass). We simply don't know of anything else.



                In science fiction landscapes, artificial gravity is simply too useful to not have. We use it all over. Nearly every major science fiction show set on a spaceship has it. Only a handful dare to deal with microgravity in its true form. There's plenty of handwavy reasons for it, but most shows seem to merely assume that artificial gravity works, and move on with the plot. Some will rely on centrifugal force to create the artificial gravity, but that only applies on stations where your people operate on the inside. Since you're on the outside of a planet, that won't work. That being said, if you were operating a mining expedition, you might be able to spin the planet and have "gravity" face the other way (for a short while, before the rocks of the planet break up and fly off).



                If you want to add some pseudoscience, feel free to say something about gravitons. That's the hypothetical particle in QM that is supposed to be responsible for gravity. However, nobody has been able to figure out how to work the math for gravitons, so we don't even know how to look for them, much less create them. Still, as far as believability goes, it's at least the name scientists use when exploring gravity.



                And besides, microgravity is pretty cool when you really get down to it.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The answer, unfortunately, is "artificial gravity," and don't explain it.



                Speaking from a purely scientific perspective there is no known substitute for mass. The only known way to cause gravity is to have mass (or an ungodly amount of energy which is equivalent to said mass). We simply don't know of anything else.



                In science fiction landscapes, artificial gravity is simply too useful to not have. We use it all over. Nearly every major science fiction show set on a spaceship has it. Only a handful dare to deal with microgravity in its true form. There's plenty of handwavy reasons for it, but most shows seem to merely assume that artificial gravity works, and move on with the plot. Some will rely on centrifugal force to create the artificial gravity, but that only applies on stations where your people operate on the inside. Since you're on the outside of a planet, that won't work. That being said, if you were operating a mining expedition, you might be able to spin the planet and have "gravity" face the other way (for a short while, before the rocks of the planet break up and fly off).



                If you want to add some pseudoscience, feel free to say something about gravitons. That's the hypothetical particle in QM that is supposed to be responsible for gravity. However, nobody has been able to figure out how to work the math for gravitons, so we don't even know how to look for them, much less create them. Still, as far as believability goes, it's at least the name scientists use when exploring gravity.



                And besides, microgravity is pretty cool when you really get down to it.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                Cort AmmonCort Ammon

                109k17188386




                109k17188386























                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Two Options



                    Actual Increased Gravity



                    Gravity is a product of mass and in the case of a human and a moon, to make the gravitational attraction increase one may either increase the mass of the human or the mass of moon.




                    1. Increasing the mass of the moon would create a situation most similar to "Earth conditions." One could do this by dumping mass on the outside, or by removing parts of the innards and replacing with more dense material. Either of these options are well outside the capabilities of our current civilization, and even for a civilization that was ready to colonize the Jovian system this would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive or impossible. A bigger problem would be that increasing the mass of Jovian moons would change the orbits of said moons. The largest Jovian moons orbit in stable resonance and adding mass to some/all of them would destroy this stable condition, leading to more erratic orbits and possible collisions between moons or with Jupiter.

                    2. Increasing the mass of the astronaut/settler is less commonly suggested. For instance, if a settler on some moon experiences 1/3g, and that person wears garments that effectively distribute double their weight across their body, they will feel 1g in their normal movement such as walking or moving their arms. This will not help with things like changing in the shape of the eyes or deterioration of the heart, but it would help a lot with muscle atrophy. This would also not help with other aspects of low-g environments such as drinking fluids, moving objects, etc. For more detail see this.


                    Artificial Gravity



                    By artificial gravity I mean simulation of gravity via an "apparent" force. This is most commonly done in science fiction by having people live in rotating habitats shaped as a cylinder or wheel. The (centrifugal) force is outward against the outer edge, which essentially become a floor that curves around. You can visualize and learn more about these schemes here and here. This could be done either on the surface or in orbit:




                    1. On the surface, the only way to keep the artificial gravity constant would be to rotate with a rotational axis perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise when rotating away from the surface one would feel lighter, then heavier as they approached the surface again (ferris wheel configuration). So if rotating with an axis perpendicular to the surface (merry go round configuration), combined with the moon's gravity, this would make the "floors" of your rotating habitat feel tilted. This is because force would be generated outward (parallel to the surface) but the gravity field would act downward (toward the surface). If you're interested I can try and draw a vector diagram to demonstrate this. The point is there's not really a perfect way to do this at the surface.

                    2. In orbit, a space habitat would be in freefall, thus experiencing what we call zero-g (like on the ISS). In this case, a rotating habitat could provide a constant 1g by spinning at the right speed for its size. If reaching the surface for mining/farming/building is necessary, it can be done by shuttling or using some future tech such as a space elevator.

                    3. There is a third option that I think is even less likely but possible. Habitats could be built in the interior, with the floor being the outer surface (think like being upside down in a cave). The moon could then be accelerated rotationally, until the spin simulates an outward force of 1g plus whatever the moon's gravity is. This would allow for living in subsurface dwellings at 1g, but there are big issues: First, the energy required to increase the moon's spin this much would be massive, and it's unclear how exactly this would be done besides literally strapping rockets to the moon. Second, the outward force would be most apparent at the equator, and go to zero at the poles. So in a strip at the equator this is workable, but as one moves away in latitude the effect decreases noticeably. Third, anyone on the outer surface would feel an outward force of 1g (think like if gravity on Earth reversed and you had to hang on to keep from flying off). This relates to the former issue in that it would be most drastic at the equator and not apparent at the poles. Fourth, it's up for debate whether a moon would even stay in one piece rotating fast enough to provide 1g outward. The whole thing might fly off in a bunch of chunks. This idea is commonly proposed for colonizing small asteroids, but would not be a great idea for, say, Io. Though maybe for some of the much smaller outer moons this would be more valid.


                    What's Likely?



                    It seems that you really want settlers to live in 1g on the surface of these Jovian moons. It is really unlikely that this setting would ever happen without handwaving some material that "magically" increases density/gravity. In all likelihood your settlers would settle (hah) for living in reduced gravity on the surface and deal with the health effects, or live in 1g in a space habitat and transfer to the surface when necessary.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$


















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Two Options



                      Actual Increased Gravity



                      Gravity is a product of mass and in the case of a human and a moon, to make the gravitational attraction increase one may either increase the mass of the human or the mass of moon.




                      1. Increasing the mass of the moon would create a situation most similar to "Earth conditions." One could do this by dumping mass on the outside, or by removing parts of the innards and replacing with more dense material. Either of these options are well outside the capabilities of our current civilization, and even for a civilization that was ready to colonize the Jovian system this would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive or impossible. A bigger problem would be that increasing the mass of Jovian moons would change the orbits of said moons. The largest Jovian moons orbit in stable resonance and adding mass to some/all of them would destroy this stable condition, leading to more erratic orbits and possible collisions between moons or with Jupiter.

                      2. Increasing the mass of the astronaut/settler is less commonly suggested. For instance, if a settler on some moon experiences 1/3g, and that person wears garments that effectively distribute double their weight across their body, they will feel 1g in their normal movement such as walking or moving their arms. This will not help with things like changing in the shape of the eyes or deterioration of the heart, but it would help a lot with muscle atrophy. This would also not help with other aspects of low-g environments such as drinking fluids, moving objects, etc. For more detail see this.


                      Artificial Gravity



                      By artificial gravity I mean simulation of gravity via an "apparent" force. This is most commonly done in science fiction by having people live in rotating habitats shaped as a cylinder or wheel. The (centrifugal) force is outward against the outer edge, which essentially become a floor that curves around. You can visualize and learn more about these schemes here and here. This could be done either on the surface or in orbit:




                      1. On the surface, the only way to keep the artificial gravity constant would be to rotate with a rotational axis perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise when rotating away from the surface one would feel lighter, then heavier as they approached the surface again (ferris wheel configuration). So if rotating with an axis perpendicular to the surface (merry go round configuration), combined with the moon's gravity, this would make the "floors" of your rotating habitat feel tilted. This is because force would be generated outward (parallel to the surface) but the gravity field would act downward (toward the surface). If you're interested I can try and draw a vector diagram to demonstrate this. The point is there's not really a perfect way to do this at the surface.

                      2. In orbit, a space habitat would be in freefall, thus experiencing what we call zero-g (like on the ISS). In this case, a rotating habitat could provide a constant 1g by spinning at the right speed for its size. If reaching the surface for mining/farming/building is necessary, it can be done by shuttling or using some future tech such as a space elevator.

                      3. There is a third option that I think is even less likely but possible. Habitats could be built in the interior, with the floor being the outer surface (think like being upside down in a cave). The moon could then be accelerated rotationally, until the spin simulates an outward force of 1g plus whatever the moon's gravity is. This would allow for living in subsurface dwellings at 1g, but there are big issues: First, the energy required to increase the moon's spin this much would be massive, and it's unclear how exactly this would be done besides literally strapping rockets to the moon. Second, the outward force would be most apparent at the equator, and go to zero at the poles. So in a strip at the equator this is workable, but as one moves away in latitude the effect decreases noticeably. Third, anyone on the outer surface would feel an outward force of 1g (think like if gravity on Earth reversed and you had to hang on to keep from flying off). This relates to the former issue in that it would be most drastic at the equator and not apparent at the poles. Fourth, it's up for debate whether a moon would even stay in one piece rotating fast enough to provide 1g outward. The whole thing might fly off in a bunch of chunks. This idea is commonly proposed for colonizing small asteroids, but would not be a great idea for, say, Io. Though maybe for some of the much smaller outer moons this would be more valid.


                      What's Likely?



                      It seems that you really want settlers to live in 1g on the surface of these Jovian moons. It is really unlikely that this setting would ever happen without handwaving some material that "magically" increases density/gravity. In all likelihood your settlers would settle (hah) for living in reduced gravity on the surface and deal with the health effects, or live in 1g in a space habitat and transfer to the surface when necessary.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$
















                        3












                        3








                        3





                        $begingroup$

                        Two Options



                        Actual Increased Gravity



                        Gravity is a product of mass and in the case of a human and a moon, to make the gravitational attraction increase one may either increase the mass of the human or the mass of moon.




                        1. Increasing the mass of the moon would create a situation most similar to "Earth conditions." One could do this by dumping mass on the outside, or by removing parts of the innards and replacing with more dense material. Either of these options are well outside the capabilities of our current civilization, and even for a civilization that was ready to colonize the Jovian system this would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive or impossible. A bigger problem would be that increasing the mass of Jovian moons would change the orbits of said moons. The largest Jovian moons orbit in stable resonance and adding mass to some/all of them would destroy this stable condition, leading to more erratic orbits and possible collisions between moons or with Jupiter.

                        2. Increasing the mass of the astronaut/settler is less commonly suggested. For instance, if a settler on some moon experiences 1/3g, and that person wears garments that effectively distribute double their weight across their body, they will feel 1g in their normal movement such as walking or moving their arms. This will not help with things like changing in the shape of the eyes or deterioration of the heart, but it would help a lot with muscle atrophy. This would also not help with other aspects of low-g environments such as drinking fluids, moving objects, etc. For more detail see this.


                        Artificial Gravity



                        By artificial gravity I mean simulation of gravity via an "apparent" force. This is most commonly done in science fiction by having people live in rotating habitats shaped as a cylinder or wheel. The (centrifugal) force is outward against the outer edge, which essentially become a floor that curves around. You can visualize and learn more about these schemes here and here. This could be done either on the surface or in orbit:




                        1. On the surface, the only way to keep the artificial gravity constant would be to rotate with a rotational axis perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise when rotating away from the surface one would feel lighter, then heavier as they approached the surface again (ferris wheel configuration). So if rotating with an axis perpendicular to the surface (merry go round configuration), combined with the moon's gravity, this would make the "floors" of your rotating habitat feel tilted. This is because force would be generated outward (parallel to the surface) but the gravity field would act downward (toward the surface). If you're interested I can try and draw a vector diagram to demonstrate this. The point is there's not really a perfect way to do this at the surface.

                        2. In orbit, a space habitat would be in freefall, thus experiencing what we call zero-g (like on the ISS). In this case, a rotating habitat could provide a constant 1g by spinning at the right speed for its size. If reaching the surface for mining/farming/building is necessary, it can be done by shuttling or using some future tech such as a space elevator.

                        3. There is a third option that I think is even less likely but possible. Habitats could be built in the interior, with the floor being the outer surface (think like being upside down in a cave). The moon could then be accelerated rotationally, until the spin simulates an outward force of 1g plus whatever the moon's gravity is. This would allow for living in subsurface dwellings at 1g, but there are big issues: First, the energy required to increase the moon's spin this much would be massive, and it's unclear how exactly this would be done besides literally strapping rockets to the moon. Second, the outward force would be most apparent at the equator, and go to zero at the poles. So in a strip at the equator this is workable, but as one moves away in latitude the effect decreases noticeably. Third, anyone on the outer surface would feel an outward force of 1g (think like if gravity on Earth reversed and you had to hang on to keep from flying off). This relates to the former issue in that it would be most drastic at the equator and not apparent at the poles. Fourth, it's up for debate whether a moon would even stay in one piece rotating fast enough to provide 1g outward. The whole thing might fly off in a bunch of chunks. This idea is commonly proposed for colonizing small asteroids, but would not be a great idea for, say, Io. Though maybe for some of the much smaller outer moons this would be more valid.


                        What's Likely?



                        It seems that you really want settlers to live in 1g on the surface of these Jovian moons. It is really unlikely that this setting would ever happen without handwaving some material that "magically" increases density/gravity. In all likelihood your settlers would settle (hah) for living in reduced gravity on the surface and deal with the health effects, or live in 1g in a space habitat and transfer to the surface when necessary.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Two Options



                        Actual Increased Gravity



                        Gravity is a product of mass and in the case of a human and a moon, to make the gravitational attraction increase one may either increase the mass of the human or the mass of moon.




                        1. Increasing the mass of the moon would create a situation most similar to "Earth conditions." One could do this by dumping mass on the outside, or by removing parts of the innards and replacing with more dense material. Either of these options are well outside the capabilities of our current civilization, and even for a civilization that was ready to colonize the Jovian system this would almost certainly be prohibitively expensive or impossible. A bigger problem would be that increasing the mass of Jovian moons would change the orbits of said moons. The largest Jovian moons orbit in stable resonance and adding mass to some/all of them would destroy this stable condition, leading to more erratic orbits and possible collisions between moons or with Jupiter.

                        2. Increasing the mass of the astronaut/settler is less commonly suggested. For instance, if a settler on some moon experiences 1/3g, and that person wears garments that effectively distribute double their weight across their body, they will feel 1g in their normal movement such as walking or moving their arms. This will not help with things like changing in the shape of the eyes or deterioration of the heart, but it would help a lot with muscle atrophy. This would also not help with other aspects of low-g environments such as drinking fluids, moving objects, etc. For more detail see this.


                        Artificial Gravity



                        By artificial gravity I mean simulation of gravity via an "apparent" force. This is most commonly done in science fiction by having people live in rotating habitats shaped as a cylinder or wheel. The (centrifugal) force is outward against the outer edge, which essentially become a floor that curves around. You can visualize and learn more about these schemes here and here. This could be done either on the surface or in orbit:




                        1. On the surface, the only way to keep the artificial gravity constant would be to rotate with a rotational axis perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise when rotating away from the surface one would feel lighter, then heavier as they approached the surface again (ferris wheel configuration). So if rotating with an axis perpendicular to the surface (merry go round configuration), combined with the moon's gravity, this would make the "floors" of your rotating habitat feel tilted. This is because force would be generated outward (parallel to the surface) but the gravity field would act downward (toward the surface). If you're interested I can try and draw a vector diagram to demonstrate this. The point is there's not really a perfect way to do this at the surface.

                        2. In orbit, a space habitat would be in freefall, thus experiencing what we call zero-g (like on the ISS). In this case, a rotating habitat could provide a constant 1g by spinning at the right speed for its size. If reaching the surface for mining/farming/building is necessary, it can be done by shuttling or using some future tech such as a space elevator.

                        3. There is a third option that I think is even less likely but possible. Habitats could be built in the interior, with the floor being the outer surface (think like being upside down in a cave). The moon could then be accelerated rotationally, until the spin simulates an outward force of 1g plus whatever the moon's gravity is. This would allow for living in subsurface dwellings at 1g, but there are big issues: First, the energy required to increase the moon's spin this much would be massive, and it's unclear how exactly this would be done besides literally strapping rockets to the moon. Second, the outward force would be most apparent at the equator, and go to zero at the poles. So in a strip at the equator this is workable, but as one moves away in latitude the effect decreases noticeably. Third, anyone on the outer surface would feel an outward force of 1g (think like if gravity on Earth reversed and you had to hang on to keep from flying off). This relates to the former issue in that it would be most drastic at the equator and not apparent at the poles. Fourth, it's up for debate whether a moon would even stay in one piece rotating fast enough to provide 1g outward. The whole thing might fly off in a bunch of chunks. This idea is commonly proposed for colonizing small asteroids, but would not be a great idea for, say, Io. Though maybe for some of the much smaller outer moons this would be more valid.


                        What's Likely?



                        It seems that you really want settlers to live in 1g on the surface of these Jovian moons. It is really unlikely that this setting would ever happen without handwaving some material that "magically" increases density/gravity. In all likelihood your settlers would settle (hah) for living in reduced gravity on the surface and deal with the health effects, or live in 1g in a space habitat and transfer to the surface when necessary.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 1 hour ago









                        benben

                        4526




                        4526























                            0












                            $begingroup$

                            You would have to increase the planet's mass or core; I'm not sure how you could manage to do that though.






                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            $endgroup$


















                              0












                              $begingroup$

                              You would have to increase the planet's mass or core; I'm not sure how you could manage to do that though.






                              share|improve this answer








                              New contributor




                              DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                              $endgroup$
















                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                You would have to increase the planet's mass or core; I'm not sure how you could manage to do that though.






                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$



                                You would have to increase the planet's mass or core; I'm not sure how you could manage to do that though.







                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer






                                New contributor




                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered 1 hour ago









                                DoorKnobDoorKnob

                                12




                                12




                                New contributor




                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                DoorKnob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    The surface gravity of a spherical body is governed by the following equation:



                                    $$
                                    g propto frac {m}{r^2}
                                    $$



                                    Thus, there are two ways to increase the gravity.




                                    1. Add more mass $m$.

                                    2. Decrease the radius $r$.


                                    Adding more mass



                                    If a moon has 5% of the surface gravity of the Earth then you'll have to add many more moons of material in order to increase the gravity to Earth levels. At this point you're no longer modifying the existant moon. You're building a new bigger moon.



                                    Decreasing the radius



                                    You're better off decreasing the radius. If you decrease a moon's radius while keeping the mass constant then the surface gravity increases. You can do this by transmuting the moon's light elements into denser elements. Human beings can already transmute some elements on a small scale. If generalized to the right elements and scaled up, then this process could increase the surface gravity of a planet or moon.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$


















                                      0












                                      $begingroup$

                                      The surface gravity of a spherical body is governed by the following equation:



                                      $$
                                      g propto frac {m}{r^2}
                                      $$



                                      Thus, there are two ways to increase the gravity.




                                      1. Add more mass $m$.

                                      2. Decrease the radius $r$.


                                      Adding more mass



                                      If a moon has 5% of the surface gravity of the Earth then you'll have to add many more moons of material in order to increase the gravity to Earth levels. At this point you're no longer modifying the existant moon. You're building a new bigger moon.



                                      Decreasing the radius



                                      You're better off decreasing the radius. If you decrease a moon's radius while keeping the mass constant then the surface gravity increases. You can do this by transmuting the moon's light elements into denser elements. Human beings can already transmute some elements on a small scale. If generalized to the right elements and scaled up, then this process could increase the surface gravity of a planet or moon.






                                      share|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$
















                                        0












                                        0








                                        0





                                        $begingroup$

                                        The surface gravity of a spherical body is governed by the following equation:



                                        $$
                                        g propto frac {m}{r^2}
                                        $$



                                        Thus, there are two ways to increase the gravity.




                                        1. Add more mass $m$.

                                        2. Decrease the radius $r$.


                                        Adding more mass



                                        If a moon has 5% of the surface gravity of the Earth then you'll have to add many more moons of material in order to increase the gravity to Earth levels. At this point you're no longer modifying the existant moon. You're building a new bigger moon.



                                        Decreasing the radius



                                        You're better off decreasing the radius. If you decrease a moon's radius while keeping the mass constant then the surface gravity increases. You can do this by transmuting the moon's light elements into denser elements. Human beings can already transmute some elements on a small scale. If generalized to the right elements and scaled up, then this process could increase the surface gravity of a planet or moon.






                                        share|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$



                                        The surface gravity of a spherical body is governed by the following equation:



                                        $$
                                        g propto frac {m}{r^2}
                                        $$



                                        Thus, there are two ways to increase the gravity.




                                        1. Add more mass $m$.

                                        2. Decrease the radius $r$.


                                        Adding more mass



                                        If a moon has 5% of the surface gravity of the Earth then you'll have to add many more moons of material in order to increase the gravity to Earth levels. At this point you're no longer modifying the existant moon. You're building a new bigger moon.



                                        Decreasing the radius



                                        You're better off decreasing the radius. If you decrease a moon's radius while keeping the mass constant then the surface gravity increases. You can do this by transmuting the moon's light elements into denser elements. Human beings can already transmute some elements on a small scale. If generalized to the right elements and scaled up, then this process could increase the surface gravity of a planet or moon.







                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited 1 hour ago

























                                        answered 1 hour ago









                                        lsusrlsusr

                                        34617




                                        34617























                                            0












                                            $begingroup$

                                            Option 1:



                                            Depleted uranium shell on the moon's surface, of sufficient thickness to add the mass required, but that would add cost to whatever activity needs to break the surface. Plus the increase radiation hazard, but you're on a moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field. Alternately, a better, but more expensive, solution would be to drive shafts down to the core of the moon and dump the depleted uranium there.



                                            Option 2:



                                            Rather than increasing gravity across the entire surface of the moon, do it only in enclosed, inhabited biospheres. Use high pressure pumps to circulate air by drawing in in from the bottom and releasing it at the top of the biosphere dome. The atmospheric pressure plus the downward velocity of the air should act as a suitable simulation of gravity.






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$


















                                              0












                                              $begingroup$

                                              Option 1:



                                              Depleted uranium shell on the moon's surface, of sufficient thickness to add the mass required, but that would add cost to whatever activity needs to break the surface. Plus the increase radiation hazard, but you're on a moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field. Alternately, a better, but more expensive, solution would be to drive shafts down to the core of the moon and dump the depleted uranium there.



                                              Option 2:



                                              Rather than increasing gravity across the entire surface of the moon, do it only in enclosed, inhabited biospheres. Use high pressure pumps to circulate air by drawing in in from the bottom and releasing it at the top of the biosphere dome. The atmospheric pressure plus the downward velocity of the air should act as a suitable simulation of gravity.






                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$
















                                                0












                                                0








                                                0





                                                $begingroup$

                                                Option 1:



                                                Depleted uranium shell on the moon's surface, of sufficient thickness to add the mass required, but that would add cost to whatever activity needs to break the surface. Plus the increase radiation hazard, but you're on a moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field. Alternately, a better, but more expensive, solution would be to drive shafts down to the core of the moon and dump the depleted uranium there.



                                                Option 2:



                                                Rather than increasing gravity across the entire surface of the moon, do it only in enclosed, inhabited biospheres. Use high pressure pumps to circulate air by drawing in in from the bottom and releasing it at the top of the biosphere dome. The atmospheric pressure plus the downward velocity of the air should act as a suitable simulation of gravity.






                                                share|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                Option 1:



                                                Depleted uranium shell on the moon's surface, of sufficient thickness to add the mass required, but that would add cost to whatever activity needs to break the surface. Plus the increase radiation hazard, but you're on a moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field. Alternately, a better, but more expensive, solution would be to drive shafts down to the core of the moon and dump the depleted uranium there.



                                                Option 2:



                                                Rather than increasing gravity across the entire surface of the moon, do it only in enclosed, inhabited biospheres. Use high pressure pumps to circulate air by drawing in in from the bottom and releasing it at the top of the biosphere dome. The atmospheric pressure plus the downward velocity of the air should act as a suitable simulation of gravity.







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered 57 mins ago









                                                nzamannzaman

                                                9,58411547




                                                9,58411547






















                                                    Dilettanter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded


















                                                    Dilettanter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                                    Dilettanter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                                    Dilettanter is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid



                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function () {
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138191%2fhow-to-increase-a-planets-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                    }
                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

                                                    Single-Malt-Whisky

                                                    Czorneboh