What happens to a wavefunction upon measurement when there's degeneracy?












3












$begingroup$


I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






quantum-mechanics quantum-states







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






    quantum-mechanics quantum-states







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






      quantum-mechanics quantum-states







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'll use a hydrogen atom as an example. A hydrogen atom has multiple energy eigenstates for all but one of its energy levels. Suppose I measure a hydrogen atom to have an energy $E_n$ where $n > 1$. What's the state of the hydrogen atom right after my measurement?






      quantum-mechanics quantum-states




      quantum-mechanics quantum-states






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      PiKindOfGuyPiKindOfGuy

      493515




      493515






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago



















          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458360%2fwhat-happens-to-a-wavefunction-upon-measurement-when-theres-degeneracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago
















          4












          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This occurs in all measurements, because you don't measure the quantum number of every particle in the universe.



          If you believe in the Copenhagen interpretation, then in your example the state after measurement is the projection of the original state onto the subspace with energy $E_n$. For example, let's use the quantum numbers $n$, $l$, where $l$ is the angular momentum. If the original state was $|1,0rangle+i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$, and you measure $n=2$, then after measurement the state becomes $i|2,0rangle-|2,1rangle$.



          If you believe instead in standard quantum mechanics, then nothing happens to the wavefunction you're observing, but you become entangled with the wavefunction in a way that leads to the same facts about the results of your future measurements.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Ben CrowellBen Crowell

          50.3k5155296




          50.3k5155296












          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I'm a beginner. Should I concern myself with what you call "standard quantum mechanics"? Entanglement is still pretty foreign to me.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Normalize your states so I can accept your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago











          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The measurement is a projection so the appropriate projection operator would be
          $$
          hatPi= sum_{r=1}^k vert E_n;alpha_rranglelangle E_n;alpha_rvert
          $$
          where $vert E_n;alpha_rrangle$ is an eigenstate of $hat H$ with energy $E_n$ and $alpha_r$ denotes all the other eigenvalues required to fully label your states, given a complete set of commuting observables.



          Thus, you’d get
          $$
          vertPhirangle=hat Pivert psirangle = sum_r vert E_n;alpha_rrangle c_{r}, ,tag{1}
          $$
          where $c_r=langle E_n;alpha rvertpsirangle$. Note that projection does not preserve the norm so (1) must be normalized by dividing “manually” by
          $sqrt{sum_r vert c_rvert^2}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero

          19.6k53159




          19.6k53159












          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
            $endgroup$
            – PiKindOfGuy
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            6 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          So Ben's answer is correct, except that the states ought to be normalized (for proper use)?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Yes his is correct albeit a little less general, and the normalization is missing.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Should I pick the answer that I think is most complete or the one that helped me the most?
          $endgroup$
          – PiKindOfGuy
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Frankly it doesn’t matter much. You can just let it happen and decide in 24hrs.
          $endgroup$
          – ZeroTheHero
          6 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458360%2fwhat-happens-to-a-wavefunction-upon-measurement-when-theres-degeneracy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

          Image
          In der Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland sind alle denkmalgeschützten Bauten der Stadt Friedland (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) und ihrer Ortsteile aufgelistet. Grundlage ist die Veröffentlichung der Denkmalliste des Landkreises Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (Auszug) vom 28. September 2016. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen 1.1 Friedland 1.2 Bresewitz 1.3 Brohm 1.4 Cosa 1.5 Dishley 1.6 Dishley-Ausbau 1.7 Eichhorst 1.8 Glienke 1.9 Heinrichshöh 1.10 Heinrichswalde 1.11 Jatzke 1.12 Jatzke-Meierei 1.13 Liepen 1.14 Ramelow 1.15 Schwanbeck 2 Vorgesehener Denkmalbereich 3 Quelle 4 Weblinks Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen | Friedland | ID Lage Bezeichnung Beschreibung Bild 281 An der Kleinbahn 2 Windmühle mit Umgang 282 Anklamer Straße alter Friedhof mit Portalwand 282 Anklamer Straße drei Erbbegräbnissen und Gräbern u. a. H.A. Riemann 284
          Read more

          Single-Malt-Whisky

          Image
          Fünf verschiedene schottische Single-Malt-Whiskys Als Single-Malt-Whisky oder kürzer Single Malt werden Whiskys bezeichnet, die zwei besondere Bedingungen erfüllen: Sie stammen zum ersten aus einer einzigen Brennerei, sind also kein Verschnitt aus mehreren Whiskysorten (daher Single , deutsch: einzeln). Zum zweiten wird als Getreide ausschließlich gemälzte Gerste verwendet (deswegen Malt , deutsch: Malz). Der Zusatz Single Malt wird als Prädikat verstanden, die so ausgezeichneten Whiskys sind in aller Regel besonders hochwertig. Hinzu kommt ihre besonders lange Lagerung, die Reifungszeit währt oft ein Jahrzehnt und länger. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Allgemeines 2 Herkunftsländer 2.1 Schottland 2.2 Irland 2.3 Japan 2.4 Kontinentaleuropa 3 Produktionsschritte 3.1 Mälzen 3.2 Brauen 3.3 Brennen 3.4 Reifung und Finish 3.5 Abfüllung 4 Altersangaben 5 Lagerung von Whiskyflaschen 6 Geschmacksklassifikation 7 Sonstig
          Read more

          Czorneboh

          Image
          Dieser Artikel erläutert den Berg Czorneboh, für die Gottheit siehe Czorneboh (Gottheit). Czorneboh Čornobóh Berggasthof mit Turm Höhe 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] Lage Freistaat Sachsen, Deutschland Gebirge Lausitzer Bergland Dominanz 15,4 km →  Kottmar Koordinaten 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O 51.119722222222 14.525194444444 555.7 Koordinaten: 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O Gestein Granodiorit Besonderheiten Aussichtsturm Czorneboh Der Czorneboh , obersorbisch Čornobóh , ist ein Berg zwischen Hochkirch und Cunewalde in der Oberlausitz. Er gehört zu der südöstlich von Bautzen gelegenen Czorneboh-Bergkette und ist mit einer Höhe von 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] der höchste Punkt dieses Ausläufers des Lausitzer Berglandes. Er leitet als Landschaftselement die wellige Granitlandschaft der Lausitzer Vorbergzone ein. Der Gipfel des Czorneboh liegt in der Gemarkung Meschwitz (Gemeinde Hochkirch), die Czornebohbaude jedoch
          Read more