What (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?












11














As per the cliché, after getting hit by a truck, our protagonist finds herself in a 'swords and sorcery' fantasy world. Also as per the cliché, she is granted an overpowered ability to make her new life easier. In this case, she gains the ability to summon/create anything she can imagine as long as she has a reasonable (layman's) grasp on how the thing works.
Unfortunately, the world is on the verge of being overrun by the vile, undead minions of a group of necromancers. Having witnessed for herself exactly what kind of atrocities the necromancers are committing against the living (with suffering and death being powerful fuel for their foul magic) she vows to remove the taint of their existence from the world. Fortunately, she has played plenty of shooters and RTS games to have some idea of the weapons she can use against them. However, those are designed to work against living, human targets.



Available tech



The world is a fairly generic medieval fantasy world. The enemy skeletons are limited in armor and weapons to medieval level. I'm thinking of equipping the skeletons with sword and/or longbow and wearing up to full plate armor.



The protagonist has access to modern day knowledge of weapons and tactics. This includes weapons and tools that could semi-realistically be built with modern technology even if in practice the expense/complexity would be unfeasible. For example, remotely/AI controlled tanks and machine guns, and maybe even a version of the 'rods of god'. (If I find a way to justify summoning something not just in orbital position but having orbital velocity as well.)



The enemy



Skeletons are animated dead. They are not so much dead bodies given life again as they are a conveniently arranged collection of bones whose parts are enchanted with magic to make them move again. Even if a skeleton is damaged, any separated parts will continue to move and act on their own. For example, a disembodied arm will use its hand to crawl along the floor and grab at opponents' legs. As long as any part is still able to move it will continue to try to harm the living in any way possible. A 'complete' skeleton will fight with any weapons it can find while any 'spare parts' will bite, scratch, grab and kick as able.



This, unfortunately, means that it is not enough to simply remove the head or destroy the brain. Also, unfortunately, the undead remains animated even if the necromancer that raised them is killed. The sheer malice of the magic giving them life ensures they only stop when fully destroyed or rendered immobile.



The question



What sort of modern weapons could the protagonist use against skeletons, if the goal is to destroy them as completely as possible? How would you destroy large groups in the open? What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece? What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?



Note that the skeleton enemies will be actively fighting back and they will number in the dozens to hundreds. Being in melee range of them is generally a bad idea, so unless the melee weapon is particularly effective a ranged approach is probably preferred, though ammunition is a potential concern. Note that the engagement is one against many, not army vs army.



Below are my own initial ideas.



Melee weapons



Bludgeoning weapons seem the most effective option, though I wonder how much physical strength would be necessary to break enough bones to take out an undead. The use of a powered exoskeleton (i.e. power armor) could mitigate some of the danger, but engaging in melee still seems like a bad idea.



Small arms



Pistols and rifles of sufficient power will break bones - if they hit and don't simply pass through the gaps in the skeleton or glance off a bone. After the torso or spine is destroyed, hitting individual limbs would be a lot harder too. Either a form of saturation fire or expert reflexes and accuracy would be needed.



Explosives



If my understanding of explosives is correct, it's the pressure of the shockwave that kills the target through internal trauma. That means that at the very least, performance against skeletons is (much?) worse than against living humans.



Kinetic bombardment



Useful against massed concentrations of undead. Basically, drop a mass of rocks on the enemy from as high as possible. Either artillery or aircraft drop something like the Lazy Dog bomb on the enemy. Though, like bullets, a lot of them would need to be dropped to ensure complete destruction of the target.



Acids



Throwing an acid or similar onto a skeleton might be easier than filling its entire space with bullets. Chlorine trifluoride comes to mind, which reacts violently with pretty much with anything, though this would probably not be safe for the user.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5




    Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
    – Guran
    5 hours ago










  • @Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
    – Loid Thanead
    5 hours ago












  • Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
    – Tim B
    4 hours ago










  • Use Napalm and burn em down
    – Julian Egner
    4 hours ago










  • Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
    – vlaz
    2 hours ago
















11














As per the cliché, after getting hit by a truck, our protagonist finds herself in a 'swords and sorcery' fantasy world. Also as per the cliché, she is granted an overpowered ability to make her new life easier. In this case, she gains the ability to summon/create anything she can imagine as long as she has a reasonable (layman's) grasp on how the thing works.
Unfortunately, the world is on the verge of being overrun by the vile, undead minions of a group of necromancers. Having witnessed for herself exactly what kind of atrocities the necromancers are committing against the living (with suffering and death being powerful fuel for their foul magic) she vows to remove the taint of their existence from the world. Fortunately, she has played plenty of shooters and RTS games to have some idea of the weapons she can use against them. However, those are designed to work against living, human targets.



Available tech



The world is a fairly generic medieval fantasy world. The enemy skeletons are limited in armor and weapons to medieval level. I'm thinking of equipping the skeletons with sword and/or longbow and wearing up to full plate armor.



The protagonist has access to modern day knowledge of weapons and tactics. This includes weapons and tools that could semi-realistically be built with modern technology even if in practice the expense/complexity would be unfeasible. For example, remotely/AI controlled tanks and machine guns, and maybe even a version of the 'rods of god'. (If I find a way to justify summoning something not just in orbital position but having orbital velocity as well.)



The enemy



Skeletons are animated dead. They are not so much dead bodies given life again as they are a conveniently arranged collection of bones whose parts are enchanted with magic to make them move again. Even if a skeleton is damaged, any separated parts will continue to move and act on their own. For example, a disembodied arm will use its hand to crawl along the floor and grab at opponents' legs. As long as any part is still able to move it will continue to try to harm the living in any way possible. A 'complete' skeleton will fight with any weapons it can find while any 'spare parts' will bite, scratch, grab and kick as able.



This, unfortunately, means that it is not enough to simply remove the head or destroy the brain. Also, unfortunately, the undead remains animated even if the necromancer that raised them is killed. The sheer malice of the magic giving them life ensures they only stop when fully destroyed or rendered immobile.



The question



What sort of modern weapons could the protagonist use against skeletons, if the goal is to destroy them as completely as possible? How would you destroy large groups in the open? What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece? What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?



Note that the skeleton enemies will be actively fighting back and they will number in the dozens to hundreds. Being in melee range of them is generally a bad idea, so unless the melee weapon is particularly effective a ranged approach is probably preferred, though ammunition is a potential concern. Note that the engagement is one against many, not army vs army.



Below are my own initial ideas.



Melee weapons



Bludgeoning weapons seem the most effective option, though I wonder how much physical strength would be necessary to break enough bones to take out an undead. The use of a powered exoskeleton (i.e. power armor) could mitigate some of the danger, but engaging in melee still seems like a bad idea.



Small arms



Pistols and rifles of sufficient power will break bones - if they hit and don't simply pass through the gaps in the skeleton or glance off a bone. After the torso or spine is destroyed, hitting individual limbs would be a lot harder too. Either a form of saturation fire or expert reflexes and accuracy would be needed.



Explosives



If my understanding of explosives is correct, it's the pressure of the shockwave that kills the target through internal trauma. That means that at the very least, performance against skeletons is (much?) worse than against living humans.



Kinetic bombardment



Useful against massed concentrations of undead. Basically, drop a mass of rocks on the enemy from as high as possible. Either artillery or aircraft drop something like the Lazy Dog bomb on the enemy. Though, like bullets, a lot of them would need to be dropped to ensure complete destruction of the target.



Acids



Throwing an acid or similar onto a skeleton might be easier than filling its entire space with bullets. Chlorine trifluoride comes to mind, which reacts violently with pretty much with anything, though this would probably not be safe for the user.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5




    Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
    – Guran
    5 hours ago










  • @Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
    – Loid Thanead
    5 hours ago












  • Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
    – Tim B
    4 hours ago










  • Use Napalm and burn em down
    – Julian Egner
    4 hours ago










  • Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
    – vlaz
    2 hours ago














11












11








11


3





As per the cliché, after getting hit by a truck, our protagonist finds herself in a 'swords and sorcery' fantasy world. Also as per the cliché, she is granted an overpowered ability to make her new life easier. In this case, she gains the ability to summon/create anything she can imagine as long as she has a reasonable (layman's) grasp on how the thing works.
Unfortunately, the world is on the verge of being overrun by the vile, undead minions of a group of necromancers. Having witnessed for herself exactly what kind of atrocities the necromancers are committing against the living (with suffering and death being powerful fuel for their foul magic) she vows to remove the taint of their existence from the world. Fortunately, she has played plenty of shooters and RTS games to have some idea of the weapons she can use against them. However, those are designed to work against living, human targets.



Available tech



The world is a fairly generic medieval fantasy world. The enemy skeletons are limited in armor and weapons to medieval level. I'm thinking of equipping the skeletons with sword and/or longbow and wearing up to full plate armor.



The protagonist has access to modern day knowledge of weapons and tactics. This includes weapons and tools that could semi-realistically be built with modern technology even if in practice the expense/complexity would be unfeasible. For example, remotely/AI controlled tanks and machine guns, and maybe even a version of the 'rods of god'. (If I find a way to justify summoning something not just in orbital position but having orbital velocity as well.)



The enemy



Skeletons are animated dead. They are not so much dead bodies given life again as they are a conveniently arranged collection of bones whose parts are enchanted with magic to make them move again. Even if a skeleton is damaged, any separated parts will continue to move and act on their own. For example, a disembodied arm will use its hand to crawl along the floor and grab at opponents' legs. As long as any part is still able to move it will continue to try to harm the living in any way possible. A 'complete' skeleton will fight with any weapons it can find while any 'spare parts' will bite, scratch, grab and kick as able.



This, unfortunately, means that it is not enough to simply remove the head or destroy the brain. Also, unfortunately, the undead remains animated even if the necromancer that raised them is killed. The sheer malice of the magic giving them life ensures they only stop when fully destroyed or rendered immobile.



The question



What sort of modern weapons could the protagonist use against skeletons, if the goal is to destroy them as completely as possible? How would you destroy large groups in the open? What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece? What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?



Note that the skeleton enemies will be actively fighting back and they will number in the dozens to hundreds. Being in melee range of them is generally a bad idea, so unless the melee weapon is particularly effective a ranged approach is probably preferred, though ammunition is a potential concern. Note that the engagement is one against many, not army vs army.



Below are my own initial ideas.



Melee weapons



Bludgeoning weapons seem the most effective option, though I wonder how much physical strength would be necessary to break enough bones to take out an undead. The use of a powered exoskeleton (i.e. power armor) could mitigate some of the danger, but engaging in melee still seems like a bad idea.



Small arms



Pistols and rifles of sufficient power will break bones - if they hit and don't simply pass through the gaps in the skeleton or glance off a bone. After the torso or spine is destroyed, hitting individual limbs would be a lot harder too. Either a form of saturation fire or expert reflexes and accuracy would be needed.



Explosives



If my understanding of explosives is correct, it's the pressure of the shockwave that kills the target through internal trauma. That means that at the very least, performance against skeletons is (much?) worse than against living humans.



Kinetic bombardment



Useful against massed concentrations of undead. Basically, drop a mass of rocks on the enemy from as high as possible. Either artillery or aircraft drop something like the Lazy Dog bomb on the enemy. Though, like bullets, a lot of them would need to be dropped to ensure complete destruction of the target.



Acids



Throwing an acid or similar onto a skeleton might be easier than filling its entire space with bullets. Chlorine trifluoride comes to mind, which reacts violently with pretty much with anything, though this would probably not be safe for the user.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











As per the cliché, after getting hit by a truck, our protagonist finds herself in a 'swords and sorcery' fantasy world. Also as per the cliché, she is granted an overpowered ability to make her new life easier. In this case, she gains the ability to summon/create anything she can imagine as long as she has a reasonable (layman's) grasp on how the thing works.
Unfortunately, the world is on the verge of being overrun by the vile, undead minions of a group of necromancers. Having witnessed for herself exactly what kind of atrocities the necromancers are committing against the living (with suffering and death being powerful fuel for their foul magic) she vows to remove the taint of their existence from the world. Fortunately, she has played plenty of shooters and RTS games to have some idea of the weapons she can use against them. However, those are designed to work against living, human targets.



Available tech



The world is a fairly generic medieval fantasy world. The enemy skeletons are limited in armor and weapons to medieval level. I'm thinking of equipping the skeletons with sword and/or longbow and wearing up to full plate armor.



The protagonist has access to modern day knowledge of weapons and tactics. This includes weapons and tools that could semi-realistically be built with modern technology even if in practice the expense/complexity would be unfeasible. For example, remotely/AI controlled tanks and machine guns, and maybe even a version of the 'rods of god'. (If I find a way to justify summoning something not just in orbital position but having orbital velocity as well.)



The enemy



Skeletons are animated dead. They are not so much dead bodies given life again as they are a conveniently arranged collection of bones whose parts are enchanted with magic to make them move again. Even if a skeleton is damaged, any separated parts will continue to move and act on their own. For example, a disembodied arm will use its hand to crawl along the floor and grab at opponents' legs. As long as any part is still able to move it will continue to try to harm the living in any way possible. A 'complete' skeleton will fight with any weapons it can find while any 'spare parts' will bite, scratch, grab and kick as able.



This, unfortunately, means that it is not enough to simply remove the head or destroy the brain. Also, unfortunately, the undead remains animated even if the necromancer that raised them is killed. The sheer malice of the magic giving them life ensures they only stop when fully destroyed or rendered immobile.



The question



What sort of modern weapons could the protagonist use against skeletons, if the goal is to destroy them as completely as possible? How would you destroy large groups in the open? What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece? What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?



Note that the skeleton enemies will be actively fighting back and they will number in the dozens to hundreds. Being in melee range of them is generally a bad idea, so unless the melee weapon is particularly effective a ranged approach is probably preferred, though ammunition is a potential concern. Note that the engagement is one against many, not army vs army.



Below are my own initial ideas.



Melee weapons



Bludgeoning weapons seem the most effective option, though I wonder how much physical strength would be necessary to break enough bones to take out an undead. The use of a powered exoskeleton (i.e. power armor) could mitigate some of the danger, but engaging in melee still seems like a bad idea.



Small arms



Pistols and rifles of sufficient power will break bones - if they hit and don't simply pass through the gaps in the skeleton or glance off a bone. After the torso or spine is destroyed, hitting individual limbs would be a lot harder too. Either a form of saturation fire or expert reflexes and accuracy would be needed.



Explosives



If my understanding of explosives is correct, it's the pressure of the shockwave that kills the target through internal trauma. That means that at the very least, performance against skeletons is (much?) worse than against living humans.



Kinetic bombardment



Useful against massed concentrations of undead. Basically, drop a mass of rocks on the enemy from as high as possible. Either artillery or aircraft drop something like the Lazy Dog bomb on the enemy. Though, like bullets, a lot of them would need to be dropped to ensure complete destruction of the target.



Acids



Throwing an acid or similar onto a skeleton might be easier than filling its entire space with bullets. Chlorine trifluoride comes to mind, which reacts violently with pretty much with anything, though this would probably not be safe for the user.







science-based magic technology weapons combat






share|improve this question









New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Gryphon

3,05822354




3,05822354






New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









Loid ThaneadLoid Thanead

565




565




New contributor




Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Loid Thanead is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 5




    Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
    – Guran
    5 hours ago










  • @Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
    – Loid Thanead
    5 hours ago












  • Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
    – Tim B
    4 hours ago










  • Use Napalm and burn em down
    – Julian Egner
    4 hours ago










  • Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
    – vlaz
    2 hours ago














  • 5




    Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
    – Guran
    5 hours ago










  • @Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
    – Loid Thanead
    5 hours ago












  • Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
    – Tim B
    4 hours ago










  • Use Napalm and burn em down
    – Julian Egner
    4 hours ago










  • Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
    – vlaz
    2 hours ago








5




5




Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
– Guran
5 hours ago




Could you clarify when a skeleton is "completely destroyed"? Is it when all individual bones are separated, or when all matter is blown into fragments? Or could even small splinters of bone keep fighting by themselves? Are the joints "magically strong" or would they come apart in an explosion?
– Guran
5 hours ago












@Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
– Loid Thanead
5 hours ago






@Guran It is 'destroyed' if it is reduced to parts that can no longer move or attack effectively on their own. For example, a single finger bone or femur cannot do anything but just lay there, while a full hand could still crawl around. As for the joints, please assume they are not much more durable than a regular human's joint. If the explosion is sufficiently close and/or powerful it will be broken.
– Loid Thanead
5 hours ago














Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
– Tim B
4 hours ago




Giving the skeletons bows makes things substantially harder since as soon as they have ranged capabilities one arrow will end things. Your hero may well need to summon a tank.
– Tim B
4 hours ago












Use Napalm and burn em down
– Julian Egner
4 hours ago




Use Napalm and burn em down
– Julian Egner
4 hours ago












Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
– vlaz
2 hours ago




Don't have enough background to say for sure but dissolving the skeletons might be a very good option. I suspect there is a chemical that acts well against bones (calcium?) and can be relatively easily produced. It doesn't even need to be splashed on them, as the logistics of getting it there safely might be hard (dunno) but you should be able to set up a big pit or trench with it, then lure the skeletons in. Or get them to a pit and pour it from above. Or maybe pour tar on top and let it solidify.
– vlaz
2 hours ago










13 Answers
13






active

oldest

votes


















18














What you need is a Mine clearance flail tank



enter image description here



Here is a video



https://youtu.be/oQK_a4aGNuc?t=52





These are based on M4 Sherman tanks and still have the standard weaponry in addition to the flails.




Fuel capacity 138–175 U.S. gallons (522–662 litres) depending upon
variant



Operational range 100–150 miles (161–241 km) on road depending upon
variant



Speed 22–30 mph (35–48 km/h) on road, depending upon variant




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman






share|improve this answer























  • How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
    – Elmy
    1 hour ago










  • The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
    – chasly from UK
    38 mins ago












  • +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
    – Renan
    11 mins ago





















15















How would you destroy large groups in the open?




Boom!




The Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created (...), it also remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated.




This works best if blown up from a few kilometers above ground. Maybe summon it already up.




What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece?




You can't save everyone, you'll always have casualties.



Other than that: use a net launcher to snare them:



Supaida girl



... Then use drones to drag them into open fields, then:



Boom!




What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?




Once again:



1-)



Supaida girl



2-) Have drones drag them to the open fields



3-)



Boom!



4-) ???



5-) Profit!!!!






share|improve this answer























  • If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
    – mega_creamery
    36 mins ago










  • Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
    – Loid Thanead
    33 mins ago












  • @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
    – Renan
    20 mins ago










  • @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
    – Renan
    19 mins ago










  • Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
    – Chris Fernandez
    10 secs ago



















14














Use immobilizing foam to neutralize the skeletons and then the villagers can go in with hammers or similar and finish them off. This will be therapeutic for the villagers in that they feel they are getting to fight back and will ensure total destruction of the skeletons.



Sticky Foam



To be sure once the skeletons are smashed up with hammers they should be swept up and burnt, ground in mills, or otherwise permanently neutralized.






share|improve this answer





















  • I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
    – Loid Thanead
    4 hours ago






  • 3




    @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
    – Tim B
    4 hours ago










  • There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
    – Loid Thanead
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
    – Julian Egner
    4 hours ago










  • @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
    – Tim B
    3 hours ago



















13














The trouble when you ask for weapons is that people think of weapons. The sound of Brrrrrt is all very well in context but we're looking at an entirely different problem here. It's closer to toxic waste disposal than combat.



Szczerzo has the right idea when it comes to small scale troubles and building clearances, pitchfork and a woodchipper is the way to go, but once you're in open fields you need something a little more industrial in scale.



I present to you, the armoured D9R.
Armoured D9R

(Wikimedia)



There's nothing in medieval combat for dealing with something like this in the field. It'll stop a cavalry charge dead in its path, skeletons mindlessly attacking are merely going to turn into bonemeal under the tracks. There may be a few stray hands crawling about the field afterwards, but that's for the woodchipper squads to clear up.






share|improve this answer





















  • +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
    – KerrAvon2055
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
    – Guran
    2 hours ago










  • @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
    – Separatrix
    1 hour ago



















11














We here, in the Department of Skeletal Removement use pitchforks (and shovels) and wood chippers.

You simply load preferred amount of skeletons on your pitchfork like in the instructional picture below



skeleton pitchforking



And then load them into wood chippers.



For the extra sureness of bone removements you can sprinkle them with phosphorus or fluoride



Always follow the safety rules and wear face mask. We don't want to inhale the bone flour. It itches in the throat for days.






share|improve this answer























  • This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
    – Loid Thanead
    4 hours ago








  • 1




    @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    4 hours ago










  • Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
    – elemtilas
    49 mins ago



















8














Shrapnel is your friend



A skeleton is in many ways a similar target to the types of barbed wire fences used in fixed defensive positions. While you can pound them with artillery and mortars, the most efficient way to create breaches in a barbed wire obstacle (if you can sneak close enough without getting shot) is with a Bangalore torpedo - basically a long, thin tube of metal filled with explosive. This is designed to produce long strips of shrapnel flying through the air to cut through any barbed wire in the vicinity. They would do a dandy job on animated skeletons. (If the protagonist cannot visualise the actual manufactured piece of kit, they are easily improvised in the field with det cord, plastic explosive and three star pickets (the same type of star pickets used to create barbed wire fences, ironically enough.) Lure as many skeletons as possible into a prepared position and initiate the charge from under cover.



If the protagonist must engage directly then she must remember one thing - this is not a video game and she only has one life. Against dozens to hundreds of enemies with longbows she will get unlucky sooner or later if she gives them any chance to hit her. So she must stay out of range (up to 300m for longbows) or in effective cover always and never expose herself to the possibility of being hit with incoming arrows. In case something goes wrong, she should get a helmet and body armour.



Engaging an untiring enemy that is difficult to hit effectively in a series of hit-and-run battles from over 300m away will be challenging. In order to be able to withdraw quickly while carrying significant weaponry and munitions a 4WD is definitely required. (Tracked armoured vehicles require significant training to operate safely and effectively, so they are not a feasible option.) My personal suggestion would be a HMMWV with a Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted and as much 40mm ammunition and fuel as can be carried. Whenever possible she should engage the skeletons from high ground and during periods of rain, both of which will have a significant negative effect on longbow effectiveness but will have minimal impact on the effectiveness of the grenade launcher.



So that takes care of open ground tactics. As for weapons and tactics for when she is going to single-handedly take on the armies of darkness in streetfighting to rescue the innocents - she must never do that. Ever. No matter what. Because if she does she will die. If it is essential to go house-to-house then conjure up a bomb disposal robot (replacing the disruptor with a shotgun) and send that in using remote control. Or she can drive to about 300m away and fire prac rounds through the Mk 19 instead of HEDP if she can get clear shots, that way there is at least no fragmentation to kill friendlies.






share|improve this answer





























    6














    Can you summon a vehicle? If so, a steamroller seems the easiest. Drive over them, watch the dust fly away.



    Otherwise I would just summon a 40mm grenade launcher or perhaps a mortar, conjure up ammo and you are good to go! A first salvo will shatter the hit skeleton and make the surrounding skeletons fall apart or to the ground. The next salvo's will make them even less dangerous. Repeat till destroyed. Mortars also have the advantage of no LOS firing. The biggest advantage is how extremely simple these things are in comparison to most other weapons.



    Or perhaps shotguns. Shotguns can tear bone apart, and automatic shotguns would basically function as ranged hammering on the skeleton.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
      – Elas
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
      – Demigan
      2 hours ago












    • @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
      – Loid Thanead
      1 hour ago












    • @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
      – Don Pablo
      46 mins ago










    • Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
      – Demigan
      38 mins ago





















    5














    A demolition crane would give you the relative safety of not engaging the skeletons in close combat and the tool to crush many bones in one simple move.



    enter image description here



    The disadvantage is than the crane cannot move very fast (although it's not very slow either), so she needs help against big groups.




    • Swiping the cranes head in an arc closely above ground can be used to knock enemies down

    • Helpers with pitchforks, nets or Tim B's proposed foam guns can keep the enemies away from the crane while it crushes one after the other in quick succession.




    Pros




    • No ammunition or supplies needed during a fight

    • destroys bones and armor alike

    • attacks quickly and efficient

    • several meters reach and not stationary

    • Protected against arrows and other weapons

    • Can be utilized for different attacks like throwing boulders at enemies as well


    Cons




    • Helpers needed to fight larger groups (or you risk being overrun)

    • Not very agile on the battlefield

    • Vocal communication difficult because of the loud machine






    share|improve this answer





























      5














      Forget military equipment, use construction equipment.



      A fleet of back-hoes to dig pits, bull dozers to shove them in, Dump trucks to drop in asphalt, you have a public works project that solves your problem for both roads and armies.



      The hot asphalt dropped down after the skeletons were pushed in would stick them together, trapping them in, if any were able to make it out, the bulldozers could take care of them. Or, steamrollers could flatten them. Mace-men could handle any that slip past, or climb up onto the vehicles.



      Plus, it adds a bit of comic relief to what could be built up as a terrifying situation.






      share|improve this answer





























        1














        For large scale destruction using bombs would be effective but it wouldn't completely destroy any skeletons they hit so i would suggest attempting to capture them and then either powder-rising them with a car compactor, something of that ilk or chucking them into an incinerator therefor completely destroying them which is what you want to do. for smaller spaces like a town... create a small ramming device that can be held that transmits a force into a target it is in contact with pulverising it. other than that, high velocity spinning blades that pulverise anything they touch, or just break it it don't mater, the objective is to destroy not injure until dead like a human.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















        • You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
          – Loid Thanead
          5 hours ago



















        1














        If (like the question suggests) the protagonist understands enough about A.I. and robotics, I would conjure up some terminators (T800; the liquid metal of the T1000 and such is most likely something the protagonist does not understand, mostly because I doubt it is possible).



        Terminators are robust enough to take a beating and more than strong enough to pull two bones apart (no need to break the bones; a single bone cannot do anything on its own, it needs to be joined to another to actually do things) even without weapons. Arm them with melee weapons and the terminators become even more destructive.



        As for putting the terminators to work, they can go into buildings to clear them, run around the fields to attack large groups of skeletons, basically anything a human can - just much better. And if defeated, you know they'll be back.



        Added advantage: once the skeletons are taken care of, the protagonist won't have to explain where she got that strange magic device she used to take care of the enemy, because she simply got help from an army from across the mountains (or sea, or whatever you want). Sure they look a bit strange, but they look human enough not to cause suspicion in the aftermath. Unconjure them (or keep a few and rule the lands) and you're done.






        share|improve this answer





























          0














          First thing that comes to mind is chain shot. Two cannon balls joined with a length of chain. Originally used to bring down the masts of sailing ships, I imagine a volley of those through the middle of a skeleton horde would do sufficient damage that the shovel-and-cudgel brigade could then wade in for the clean-up work.






          share|improve this answer





























            0














            Bludgeoning weapons and basically any high-powered explosives. Sledgehammers should be pretty good at breaking the bones, and enough TNT can reduce skeletons to piles of white powder in seconds.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "579"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              Loid Thanead is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136083%2fwhat-modern-weapons-could-be-used-to-destroy-skeletal-enemies-as-completely-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes








              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              18














              What you need is a Mine clearance flail tank



              enter image description here



              Here is a video



              https://youtu.be/oQK_a4aGNuc?t=52





              These are based on M4 Sherman tanks and still have the standard weaponry in addition to the flails.




              Fuel capacity 138–175 U.S. gallons (522–662 litres) depending upon
              variant



              Operational range 100–150 miles (161–241 km) on road depending upon
              variant



              Speed 22–30 mph (35–48 km/h) on road, depending upon variant




              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman






              share|improve this answer























              • How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
                – Elmy
                1 hour ago










              • The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
                – chasly from UK
                38 mins ago












              • +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
                – Renan
                11 mins ago


















              18














              What you need is a Mine clearance flail tank



              enter image description here



              Here is a video



              https://youtu.be/oQK_a4aGNuc?t=52





              These are based on M4 Sherman tanks and still have the standard weaponry in addition to the flails.




              Fuel capacity 138–175 U.S. gallons (522–662 litres) depending upon
              variant



              Operational range 100–150 miles (161–241 km) on road depending upon
              variant



              Speed 22–30 mph (35–48 km/h) on road, depending upon variant




              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman






              share|improve this answer























              • How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
                – Elmy
                1 hour ago










              • The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
                – chasly from UK
                38 mins ago












              • +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
                – Renan
                11 mins ago
















              18












              18








              18






              What you need is a Mine clearance flail tank



              enter image description here



              Here is a video



              https://youtu.be/oQK_a4aGNuc?t=52





              These are based on M4 Sherman tanks and still have the standard weaponry in addition to the flails.




              Fuel capacity 138–175 U.S. gallons (522–662 litres) depending upon
              variant



              Operational range 100–150 miles (161–241 km) on road depending upon
              variant



              Speed 22–30 mph (35–48 km/h) on road, depending upon variant




              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman






              share|improve this answer














              What you need is a Mine clearance flail tank



              enter image description here



              Here is a video



              https://youtu.be/oQK_a4aGNuc?t=52





              These are based on M4 Sherman tanks and still have the standard weaponry in addition to the flails.




              Fuel capacity 138–175 U.S. gallons (522–662 litres) depending upon
              variant



              Operational range 100–150 miles (161–241 km) on road depending upon
              variant



              Speed 22–30 mph (35–48 km/h) on road, depending upon variant




              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 43 mins ago

























              answered 2 hours ago









              chasly from UKchasly from UK

              12.8k358119




              12.8k358119












              • How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
                – Elmy
                1 hour ago










              • The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
                – chasly from UK
                38 mins ago












              • +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
                – Renan
                11 mins ago




















              • How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
                – Elmy
                1 hour ago










              • The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
                – chasly from UK
                38 mins ago












              • +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
                – Renan
                11 mins ago


















              How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
              – Elmy
              1 hour ago




              How fast can these things go and how much fuel do they burn while doing so? Maneuverability and fuel consumption could be a real disadvantage
              – Elmy
              1 hour ago












              The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
              – chasly from UK
              38 mins ago






              The speed depends on the terrain of course. The one shown in the video is going fairly slowly because it is flailing the ground and that means a lot of friction and a lot of power usage. It's also going slowly to make sure of hitting mines. If the flails were raised to skeleton ankle-height then the forward speed would be slower than the road speed but you could deploy to the right place quickly and selectively use the flail.
              – chasly from UK
              38 mins ago














              +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
              – Renan
              11 mins ago






              +1. The guys from Top Gear once competed to see who could demolish houses faster with tanks. One of them used this beast and if I remember well he won. Still need a solution to clear a civillian-crammed building of skeletons without damage to property though.
              – Renan
              11 mins ago













              15















              How would you destroy large groups in the open?




              Boom!




              The Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created (...), it also remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated.




              This works best if blown up from a few kilometers above ground. Maybe summon it already up.




              What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece?




              You can't save everyone, you'll always have casualties.



              Other than that: use a net launcher to snare them:



              Supaida girl



              ... Then use drones to drag them into open fields, then:



              Boom!




              What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?




              Once again:



              1-)



              Supaida girl



              2-) Have drones drag them to the open fields



              3-)



              Boom!



              4-) ???



              5-) Profit!!!!






              share|improve this answer























              • If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
                – mega_creamery
                36 mins ago










              • Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
                – Loid Thanead
                33 mins ago












              • @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
                – Renan
                20 mins ago










              • @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
                – Renan
                19 mins ago










              • Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
                – Chris Fernandez
                10 secs ago
















              15















              How would you destroy large groups in the open?




              Boom!




              The Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created (...), it also remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated.




              This works best if blown up from a few kilometers above ground. Maybe summon it already up.




              What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece?




              You can't save everyone, you'll always have casualties.



              Other than that: use a net launcher to snare them:



              Supaida girl



              ... Then use drones to drag them into open fields, then:



              Boom!




              What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?




              Once again:



              1-)



              Supaida girl



              2-) Have drones drag them to the open fields



              3-)



              Boom!



              4-) ???



              5-) Profit!!!!






              share|improve this answer























              • If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
                – mega_creamery
                36 mins ago










              • Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
                – Loid Thanead
                33 mins ago












              • @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
                – Renan
                20 mins ago










              • @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
                – Renan
                19 mins ago










              • Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
                – Chris Fernandez
                10 secs ago














              15












              15








              15







              How would you destroy large groups in the open?




              Boom!




              The Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created (...), it also remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated.




              This works best if blown up from a few kilometers above ground. Maybe summon it already up.




              What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece?




              You can't save everyone, you'll always have casualties.



              Other than that: use a net launcher to snare them:



              Supaida girl



              ... Then use drones to drag them into open fields, then:



              Boom!




              What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?




              Once again:



              1-)



              Supaida girl



              2-) Have drones drag them to the open fields



              3-)



              Boom!



              4-) ???



              5-) Profit!!!!






              share|improve this answer















              How would you destroy large groups in the open?




              Boom!




              The Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, known by Western nations as Tsar Bomba, was the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created (...), it also remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated.




              This works best if blown up from a few kilometers above ground. Maybe summon it already up.




              What about enemies occupying a town when you want to keep the buildings and any innocents in one piece?




              You can't save everyone, you'll always have casualties.



              Other than that: use a net launcher to snare them:



              Supaida girl



              ... Then use drones to drag them into open fields, then:



              Boom!




              What about clearing them out of a building without demolishing it?




              Once again:



              1-)



              Supaida girl



              2-) Have drones drag them to the open fields



              3-)



              Boom!



              4-) ???



              5-) Profit!!!!







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 19 mins ago

























              answered 4 hours ago









              RenanRenan

              44.3k11100225




              44.3k11100225












              • If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
                – mega_creamery
                36 mins ago










              • Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
                – Loid Thanead
                33 mins ago












              • @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
                – Renan
                20 mins ago










              • @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
                – Renan
                19 mins ago










              • Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
                – Chris Fernandez
                10 secs ago


















              • If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
                – mega_creamery
                36 mins ago










              • Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
                – Loid Thanead
                33 mins ago












              • @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
                – Renan
                20 mins ago










              • @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
                – Renan
                19 mins ago










              • Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
                – Chris Fernandez
                10 secs ago
















              If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
              – mega_creamery
              36 mins ago




              If you can drag them entagled would a furnace not be more practical?
              – mega_creamery
              36 mins ago












              Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
              – Loid Thanead
              33 mins ago






              Dragging that many skeletons would probably tire you out fast. That's assuming they let themselves be dragged off and don't help free one another and/or fight back. Still, when confronting a handful of enemies this would definitely be a way to procure.... test subjects. As for the Tsar Bomba, points for sheer awesomeness, though it is likely to have just a few unpleasant side effects rendering the area unsuited for later use.
              – Loid Thanead
              33 mins ago














              @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
              – Renan
              20 mins ago




              @mega_creamery nukes scale better. You can't fit 10,000 skeletons in a furnace. Also it sends a stronger message to the necromancers.
              – Renan
              20 mins ago












              @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
              – Renan
              19 mins ago




              @LoidThanead drones don't tire.
              – Renan
              19 mins ago












              Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
              – Chris Fernandez
              10 secs ago




              Drones still have batteries, right? Or is unlimited energy part of the magic when the drones are summoned?
              – Chris Fernandez
              10 secs ago











              14














              Use immobilizing foam to neutralize the skeletons and then the villagers can go in with hammers or similar and finish them off. This will be therapeutic for the villagers in that they feel they are getting to fight back and will ensure total destruction of the skeletons.



              Sticky Foam



              To be sure once the skeletons are smashed up with hammers they should be swept up and burnt, ground in mills, or otherwise permanently neutralized.






              share|improve this answer





















              • I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 3




                @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
                – Tim B
                4 hours ago










              • There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
                – Julian Egner
                4 hours ago










              • @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
                – Tim B
                3 hours ago
















              14














              Use immobilizing foam to neutralize the skeletons and then the villagers can go in with hammers or similar and finish them off. This will be therapeutic for the villagers in that they feel they are getting to fight back and will ensure total destruction of the skeletons.



              Sticky Foam



              To be sure once the skeletons are smashed up with hammers they should be swept up and burnt, ground in mills, or otherwise permanently neutralized.






              share|improve this answer





















              • I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 3




                @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
                – Tim B
                4 hours ago










              • There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
                – Julian Egner
                4 hours ago










              • @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
                – Tim B
                3 hours ago














              14












              14








              14






              Use immobilizing foam to neutralize the skeletons and then the villagers can go in with hammers or similar and finish them off. This will be therapeutic for the villagers in that they feel they are getting to fight back and will ensure total destruction of the skeletons.



              Sticky Foam



              To be sure once the skeletons are smashed up with hammers they should be swept up and burnt, ground in mills, or otherwise permanently neutralized.






              share|improve this answer












              Use immobilizing foam to neutralize the skeletons and then the villagers can go in with hammers or similar and finish them off. This will be therapeutic for the villagers in that they feel they are getting to fight back and will ensure total destruction of the skeletons.



              Sticky Foam



              To be sure once the skeletons are smashed up with hammers they should be swept up and burnt, ground in mills, or otherwise permanently neutralized.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 5 hours ago









              Tim BTim B

              59.8k23167287




              59.8k23167287












              • I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 3




                @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
                – Tim B
                4 hours ago










              • There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
                – Julian Egner
                4 hours ago










              • @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
                – Tim B
                3 hours ago


















              • I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 3




                @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
                – Tim B
                4 hours ago










              • There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago






              • 2




                Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
                – Julian Egner
                4 hours ago










              • @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
                – Tim B
                3 hours ago
















              I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago




              I really like this idea. It is definitely a very useful option when the number of enemies is small. I'm a bit concerned about ammo though, since it looks like you would need quite a bit of the foam to immobilize a single skeleton. You would also need to get relatively close to use this effectively. I've updated my question with some more context that I might not have made entirely clear initially.
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago




              3




              3




              @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
              – Tim B
              4 hours ago




              @LoidThanead You said she can summon things though? I assume that includes ammo canisters for the foamers. (Incidentally what stops her just summoning a swimming pool full of foam over the top of the skeletal horde?)
              – Tim B
              4 hours ago












              There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago




              There are limits to her ability to summon objects, mostly in terms of how big/many in how much time. She could prepare a lot of ammo beforehand, but not summon it 'on the go'. I didn't put an exact description in the question for fear of drowning readers in info
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago




              2




              2




              Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
              – Julian Egner
              4 hours ago




              Think of foam Bombs dropped from a Plane...
              – Julian Egner
              4 hours ago












              @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
              – Tim B
              3 hours ago




              @JulianEgner Yep, or a helicopter - launching and landing a plane safely would be hard. Of course you'd still need a decent pilot so unless the protagonist happened to be one that is tricky
              – Tim B
              3 hours ago











              13














              The trouble when you ask for weapons is that people think of weapons. The sound of Brrrrrt is all very well in context but we're looking at an entirely different problem here. It's closer to toxic waste disposal than combat.



              Szczerzo has the right idea when it comes to small scale troubles and building clearances, pitchfork and a woodchipper is the way to go, but once you're in open fields you need something a little more industrial in scale.



              I present to you, the armoured D9R.
              Armoured D9R

              (Wikimedia)



              There's nothing in medieval combat for dealing with something like this in the field. It'll stop a cavalry charge dead in its path, skeletons mindlessly attacking are merely going to turn into bonemeal under the tracks. There may be a few stray hands crawling about the field afterwards, but that's for the woodchipper squads to clear up.






              share|improve this answer





















              • +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
                – KerrAvon2055
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
                – Guran
                2 hours ago










              • @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
                – Separatrix
                1 hour ago
















              13














              The trouble when you ask for weapons is that people think of weapons. The sound of Brrrrrt is all very well in context but we're looking at an entirely different problem here. It's closer to toxic waste disposal than combat.



              Szczerzo has the right idea when it comes to small scale troubles and building clearances, pitchfork and a woodchipper is the way to go, but once you're in open fields you need something a little more industrial in scale.



              I present to you, the armoured D9R.
              Armoured D9R

              (Wikimedia)



              There's nothing in medieval combat for dealing with something like this in the field. It'll stop a cavalry charge dead in its path, skeletons mindlessly attacking are merely going to turn into bonemeal under the tracks. There may be a few stray hands crawling about the field afterwards, but that's for the woodchipper squads to clear up.






              share|improve this answer





















              • +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
                – KerrAvon2055
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
                – Guran
                2 hours ago










              • @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
                – Separatrix
                1 hour ago














              13












              13








              13






              The trouble when you ask for weapons is that people think of weapons. The sound of Brrrrrt is all very well in context but we're looking at an entirely different problem here. It's closer to toxic waste disposal than combat.



              Szczerzo has the right idea when it comes to small scale troubles and building clearances, pitchfork and a woodchipper is the way to go, but once you're in open fields you need something a little more industrial in scale.



              I present to you, the armoured D9R.
              Armoured D9R

              (Wikimedia)



              There's nothing in medieval combat for dealing with something like this in the field. It'll stop a cavalry charge dead in its path, skeletons mindlessly attacking are merely going to turn into bonemeal under the tracks. There may be a few stray hands crawling about the field afterwards, but that's for the woodchipper squads to clear up.






              share|improve this answer












              The trouble when you ask for weapons is that people think of weapons. The sound of Brrrrrt is all very well in context but we're looking at an entirely different problem here. It's closer to toxic waste disposal than combat.



              Szczerzo has the right idea when it comes to small scale troubles and building clearances, pitchfork and a woodchipper is the way to go, but once you're in open fields you need something a little more industrial in scale.



              I present to you, the armoured D9R.
              Armoured D9R

              (Wikimedia)



              There's nothing in medieval combat for dealing with something like this in the field. It'll stop a cavalry charge dead in its path, skeletons mindlessly attacking are merely going to turn into bonemeal under the tracks. There may be a few stray hands crawling about the field afterwards, but that's for the woodchipper squads to clear up.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              SeparatrixSeparatrix

              78.5k31185308




              78.5k31185308












              • +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
                – KerrAvon2055
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
                – Guran
                2 hours ago










              • @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
                – Separatrix
                1 hour ago


















              • +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
                – KerrAvon2055
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
                – Guran
                2 hours ago










              • @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
                – Separatrix
                1 hour ago
















              +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
              – KerrAvon2055
              2 hours ago




              +1 Looks like it was made to order - my only hesitation on that kind of kit was the training level (or implied lack thereof) of the protagonist.
              – KerrAvon2055
              2 hours ago




              1




              1




              You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
              – Guran
              2 hours ago




              You can 1-up that. Summon a mine flail (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_flail) and you'll hardly need the woodchippers anymore.
              – Guran
              2 hours ago












              @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
              – Separatrix
              1 hour ago




              @Guran, it's a good call but I have some reservations, mostly because it's usually tank mounted and hence a crew vehicle rather than easily driven alone.
              – Separatrix
              1 hour ago











              11














              We here, in the Department of Skeletal Removement use pitchforks (and shovels) and wood chippers.

              You simply load preferred amount of skeletons on your pitchfork like in the instructional picture below



              skeleton pitchforking



              And then load them into wood chippers.



              For the extra sureness of bone removements you can sprinkle them with phosphorus or fluoride



              Always follow the safety rules and wear face mask. We don't want to inhale the bone flour. It itches in the throat for days.






              share|improve this answer























              • This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
                – SZCZERZO KŁY
                4 hours ago










              • Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
                – elemtilas
                49 mins ago
















              11














              We here, in the Department of Skeletal Removement use pitchforks (and shovels) and wood chippers.

              You simply load preferred amount of skeletons on your pitchfork like in the instructional picture below



              skeleton pitchforking



              And then load them into wood chippers.



              For the extra sureness of bone removements you can sprinkle them with phosphorus or fluoride



              Always follow the safety rules and wear face mask. We don't want to inhale the bone flour. It itches in the throat for days.






              share|improve this answer























              • This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
                – SZCZERZO KŁY
                4 hours ago










              • Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
                – elemtilas
                49 mins ago














              11












              11








              11






              We here, in the Department of Skeletal Removement use pitchforks (and shovels) and wood chippers.

              You simply load preferred amount of skeletons on your pitchfork like in the instructional picture below



              skeleton pitchforking



              And then load them into wood chippers.



              For the extra sureness of bone removements you can sprinkle them with phosphorus or fluoride



              Always follow the safety rules and wear face mask. We don't want to inhale the bone flour. It itches in the throat for days.






              share|improve this answer














              We here, in the Department of Skeletal Removement use pitchforks (and shovels) and wood chippers.

              You simply load preferred amount of skeletons on your pitchfork like in the instructional picture below



              skeleton pitchforking



              And then load them into wood chippers.



              For the extra sureness of bone removements you can sprinkle them with phosphorus or fluoride



              Always follow the safety rules and wear face mask. We don't want to inhale the bone flour. It itches in the throat for days.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 3 hours ago









              Separatrix

              78.5k31185308




              78.5k31185308










              answered 4 hours ago









              SZCZERZO KŁYSZCZERZO KŁY

              16.3k22451




              16.3k22451












              • This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
                – SZCZERZO KŁY
                4 hours ago










              • Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
                – elemtilas
                49 mins ago


















              • This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
                – Loid Thanead
                4 hours ago








              • 1




                @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
                – SZCZERZO KŁY
                4 hours ago










              • Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
                – elemtilas
                49 mins ago
















              This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago






              This would definitely work against singular enemies. The intention of my question is about combat of one vs. many. (I have edited it to clarify.) I'm curious about your comment about phosphorus and fluoride though. Would these react with the bones in some way to disable them?
              – Loid Thanead
              4 hours ago






              1




              1




              @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
              – SZCZERZO KŁY
              4 hours ago




              @LoidThanead You can just modify the wood chipper to work like combine (welp, you can just use combines as well). Phosphorus and fluoride react with calcium and phosphorus is highly flammable so they would "eat" the bone. But if you use Hydrochloric acid the bones will get elastic and unable to move. Then you can just move them to one place an burn.
              – SZCZERZO KŁY
              4 hours ago












              Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
              – elemtilas
              49 mins ago




              Excellent point about personal protective gear! I'd also suggest safety goggles. Bone chips in the eyes aren't any more fun.
              – elemtilas
              49 mins ago











              8














              Shrapnel is your friend



              A skeleton is in many ways a similar target to the types of barbed wire fences used in fixed defensive positions. While you can pound them with artillery and mortars, the most efficient way to create breaches in a barbed wire obstacle (if you can sneak close enough without getting shot) is with a Bangalore torpedo - basically a long, thin tube of metal filled with explosive. This is designed to produce long strips of shrapnel flying through the air to cut through any barbed wire in the vicinity. They would do a dandy job on animated skeletons. (If the protagonist cannot visualise the actual manufactured piece of kit, they are easily improvised in the field with det cord, plastic explosive and three star pickets (the same type of star pickets used to create barbed wire fences, ironically enough.) Lure as many skeletons as possible into a prepared position and initiate the charge from under cover.



              If the protagonist must engage directly then she must remember one thing - this is not a video game and she only has one life. Against dozens to hundreds of enemies with longbows she will get unlucky sooner or later if she gives them any chance to hit her. So she must stay out of range (up to 300m for longbows) or in effective cover always and never expose herself to the possibility of being hit with incoming arrows. In case something goes wrong, she should get a helmet and body armour.



              Engaging an untiring enemy that is difficult to hit effectively in a series of hit-and-run battles from over 300m away will be challenging. In order to be able to withdraw quickly while carrying significant weaponry and munitions a 4WD is definitely required. (Tracked armoured vehicles require significant training to operate safely and effectively, so they are not a feasible option.) My personal suggestion would be a HMMWV with a Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted and as much 40mm ammunition and fuel as can be carried. Whenever possible she should engage the skeletons from high ground and during periods of rain, both of which will have a significant negative effect on longbow effectiveness but will have minimal impact on the effectiveness of the grenade launcher.



              So that takes care of open ground tactics. As for weapons and tactics for when she is going to single-handedly take on the armies of darkness in streetfighting to rescue the innocents - she must never do that. Ever. No matter what. Because if she does she will die. If it is essential to go house-to-house then conjure up a bomb disposal robot (replacing the disruptor with a shotgun) and send that in using remote control. Or she can drive to about 300m away and fire prac rounds through the Mk 19 instead of HEDP if she can get clear shots, that way there is at least no fragmentation to kill friendlies.






              share|improve this answer


























                8














                Shrapnel is your friend



                A skeleton is in many ways a similar target to the types of barbed wire fences used in fixed defensive positions. While you can pound them with artillery and mortars, the most efficient way to create breaches in a barbed wire obstacle (if you can sneak close enough without getting shot) is with a Bangalore torpedo - basically a long, thin tube of metal filled with explosive. This is designed to produce long strips of shrapnel flying through the air to cut through any barbed wire in the vicinity. They would do a dandy job on animated skeletons. (If the protagonist cannot visualise the actual manufactured piece of kit, they are easily improvised in the field with det cord, plastic explosive and three star pickets (the same type of star pickets used to create barbed wire fences, ironically enough.) Lure as many skeletons as possible into a prepared position and initiate the charge from under cover.



                If the protagonist must engage directly then she must remember one thing - this is not a video game and she only has one life. Against dozens to hundreds of enemies with longbows she will get unlucky sooner or later if she gives them any chance to hit her. So she must stay out of range (up to 300m for longbows) or in effective cover always and never expose herself to the possibility of being hit with incoming arrows. In case something goes wrong, she should get a helmet and body armour.



                Engaging an untiring enemy that is difficult to hit effectively in a series of hit-and-run battles from over 300m away will be challenging. In order to be able to withdraw quickly while carrying significant weaponry and munitions a 4WD is definitely required. (Tracked armoured vehicles require significant training to operate safely and effectively, so they are not a feasible option.) My personal suggestion would be a HMMWV with a Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted and as much 40mm ammunition and fuel as can be carried. Whenever possible she should engage the skeletons from high ground and during periods of rain, both of which will have a significant negative effect on longbow effectiveness but will have minimal impact on the effectiveness of the grenade launcher.



                So that takes care of open ground tactics. As for weapons and tactics for when she is going to single-handedly take on the armies of darkness in streetfighting to rescue the innocents - she must never do that. Ever. No matter what. Because if she does she will die. If it is essential to go house-to-house then conjure up a bomb disposal robot (replacing the disruptor with a shotgun) and send that in using remote control. Or she can drive to about 300m away and fire prac rounds through the Mk 19 instead of HEDP if she can get clear shots, that way there is at least no fragmentation to kill friendlies.






                share|improve this answer
























                  8












                  8








                  8






                  Shrapnel is your friend



                  A skeleton is in many ways a similar target to the types of barbed wire fences used in fixed defensive positions. While you can pound them with artillery and mortars, the most efficient way to create breaches in a barbed wire obstacle (if you can sneak close enough without getting shot) is with a Bangalore torpedo - basically a long, thin tube of metal filled with explosive. This is designed to produce long strips of shrapnel flying through the air to cut through any barbed wire in the vicinity. They would do a dandy job on animated skeletons. (If the protagonist cannot visualise the actual manufactured piece of kit, they are easily improvised in the field with det cord, plastic explosive and three star pickets (the same type of star pickets used to create barbed wire fences, ironically enough.) Lure as many skeletons as possible into a prepared position and initiate the charge from under cover.



                  If the protagonist must engage directly then she must remember one thing - this is not a video game and she only has one life. Against dozens to hundreds of enemies with longbows she will get unlucky sooner or later if she gives them any chance to hit her. So she must stay out of range (up to 300m for longbows) or in effective cover always and never expose herself to the possibility of being hit with incoming arrows. In case something goes wrong, she should get a helmet and body armour.



                  Engaging an untiring enemy that is difficult to hit effectively in a series of hit-and-run battles from over 300m away will be challenging. In order to be able to withdraw quickly while carrying significant weaponry and munitions a 4WD is definitely required. (Tracked armoured vehicles require significant training to operate safely and effectively, so they are not a feasible option.) My personal suggestion would be a HMMWV with a Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted and as much 40mm ammunition and fuel as can be carried. Whenever possible she should engage the skeletons from high ground and during periods of rain, both of which will have a significant negative effect on longbow effectiveness but will have minimal impact on the effectiveness of the grenade launcher.



                  So that takes care of open ground tactics. As for weapons and tactics for when she is going to single-handedly take on the armies of darkness in streetfighting to rescue the innocents - she must never do that. Ever. No matter what. Because if she does she will die. If it is essential to go house-to-house then conjure up a bomb disposal robot (replacing the disruptor with a shotgun) and send that in using remote control. Or she can drive to about 300m away and fire prac rounds through the Mk 19 instead of HEDP if she can get clear shots, that way there is at least no fragmentation to kill friendlies.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Shrapnel is your friend



                  A skeleton is in many ways a similar target to the types of barbed wire fences used in fixed defensive positions. While you can pound them with artillery and mortars, the most efficient way to create breaches in a barbed wire obstacle (if you can sneak close enough without getting shot) is with a Bangalore torpedo - basically a long, thin tube of metal filled with explosive. This is designed to produce long strips of shrapnel flying through the air to cut through any barbed wire in the vicinity. They would do a dandy job on animated skeletons. (If the protagonist cannot visualise the actual manufactured piece of kit, they are easily improvised in the field with det cord, plastic explosive and three star pickets (the same type of star pickets used to create barbed wire fences, ironically enough.) Lure as many skeletons as possible into a prepared position and initiate the charge from under cover.



                  If the protagonist must engage directly then she must remember one thing - this is not a video game and she only has one life. Against dozens to hundreds of enemies with longbows she will get unlucky sooner or later if she gives them any chance to hit her. So she must stay out of range (up to 300m for longbows) or in effective cover always and never expose herself to the possibility of being hit with incoming arrows. In case something goes wrong, she should get a helmet and body armour.



                  Engaging an untiring enemy that is difficult to hit effectively in a series of hit-and-run battles from over 300m away will be challenging. In order to be able to withdraw quickly while carrying significant weaponry and munitions a 4WD is definitely required. (Tracked armoured vehicles require significant training to operate safely and effectively, so they are not a feasible option.) My personal suggestion would be a HMMWV with a Mk 19 grenade launcher mounted and as much 40mm ammunition and fuel as can be carried. Whenever possible she should engage the skeletons from high ground and during periods of rain, both of which will have a significant negative effect on longbow effectiveness but will have minimal impact on the effectiveness of the grenade launcher.



                  So that takes care of open ground tactics. As for weapons and tactics for when she is going to single-handedly take on the armies of darkness in streetfighting to rescue the innocents - she must never do that. Ever. No matter what. Because if she does she will die. If it is essential to go house-to-house then conjure up a bomb disposal robot (replacing the disruptor with a shotgun) and send that in using remote control. Or she can drive to about 300m away and fire prac rounds through the Mk 19 instead of HEDP if she can get clear shots, that way there is at least no fragmentation to kill friendlies.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  KerrAvon2055KerrAvon2055

                  3,1701515




                  3,1701515























                      6














                      Can you summon a vehicle? If so, a steamroller seems the easiest. Drive over them, watch the dust fly away.



                      Otherwise I would just summon a 40mm grenade launcher or perhaps a mortar, conjure up ammo and you are good to go! A first salvo will shatter the hit skeleton and make the surrounding skeletons fall apart or to the ground. The next salvo's will make them even less dangerous. Repeat till destroyed. Mortars also have the advantage of no LOS firing. The biggest advantage is how extremely simple these things are in comparison to most other weapons.



                      Or perhaps shotguns. Shotguns can tear bone apart, and automatic shotguns would basically function as ranged hammering on the skeleton.






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                        – Elas
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                        – Demigan
                        2 hours ago












                      • @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                        – Loid Thanead
                        1 hour ago












                      • @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                        – Don Pablo
                        46 mins ago










                      • Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                        – Demigan
                        38 mins ago


















                      6














                      Can you summon a vehicle? If so, a steamroller seems the easiest. Drive over them, watch the dust fly away.



                      Otherwise I would just summon a 40mm grenade launcher or perhaps a mortar, conjure up ammo and you are good to go! A first salvo will shatter the hit skeleton and make the surrounding skeletons fall apart or to the ground. The next salvo's will make them even less dangerous. Repeat till destroyed. Mortars also have the advantage of no LOS firing. The biggest advantage is how extremely simple these things are in comparison to most other weapons.



                      Or perhaps shotguns. Shotguns can tear bone apart, and automatic shotguns would basically function as ranged hammering on the skeleton.






                      share|improve this answer

















                      • 1




                        Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                        – Elas
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                        – Demigan
                        2 hours ago












                      • @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                        – Loid Thanead
                        1 hour ago












                      • @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                        – Don Pablo
                        46 mins ago










                      • Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                        – Demigan
                        38 mins ago
















                      6












                      6








                      6






                      Can you summon a vehicle? If so, a steamroller seems the easiest. Drive over them, watch the dust fly away.



                      Otherwise I would just summon a 40mm grenade launcher or perhaps a mortar, conjure up ammo and you are good to go! A first salvo will shatter the hit skeleton and make the surrounding skeletons fall apart or to the ground. The next salvo's will make them even less dangerous. Repeat till destroyed. Mortars also have the advantage of no LOS firing. The biggest advantage is how extremely simple these things are in comparison to most other weapons.



                      Or perhaps shotguns. Shotguns can tear bone apart, and automatic shotguns would basically function as ranged hammering on the skeleton.






                      share|improve this answer












                      Can you summon a vehicle? If so, a steamroller seems the easiest. Drive over them, watch the dust fly away.



                      Otherwise I would just summon a 40mm grenade launcher or perhaps a mortar, conjure up ammo and you are good to go! A first salvo will shatter the hit skeleton and make the surrounding skeletons fall apart or to the ground. The next salvo's will make them even less dangerous. Repeat till destroyed. Mortars also have the advantage of no LOS firing. The biggest advantage is how extremely simple these things are in comparison to most other weapons.



                      Or perhaps shotguns. Shotguns can tear bone apart, and automatic shotguns would basically function as ranged hammering on the skeleton.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      DemiganDemigan

                      7,6331639




                      7,6331639








                      • 1




                        Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                        – Elas
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                        – Demigan
                        2 hours ago












                      • @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                        – Loid Thanead
                        1 hour ago












                      • @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                        – Don Pablo
                        46 mins ago










                      • Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                        – Demigan
                        38 mins ago
















                      • 1




                        Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                        – Elas
                        2 hours ago






                      • 1




                        @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                        – Demigan
                        2 hours ago












                      • @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                        – Loid Thanead
                        1 hour ago












                      • @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                        – Don Pablo
                        46 mins ago










                      • Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                        – Demigan
                        38 mins ago










                      1




                      1




                      Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                      – Elas
                      2 hours ago




                      Most of explosives based weapons (f.e. mortar shells) kill with shrapnels or pressure (thermobaric weapons) which won't be as effective against reanimated skeletons as they are against humans.
                      – Elas
                      2 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                      – Demigan
                      2 hours ago






                      @Elas if they were zombies you'd be right. But these are skeletons. Without Meat and organs to absorb the shock these bones will be easily broken if not pulverised (their armor should be leather instead of plate armor). I helped someone test a waterjet on pig cartilege and bone, the trick was keeping the bone "fresh" as bone loses its flexibility when its dead and without flesh, making it brittle. Living bone is tough, dead reanimated bone is not. Pressure based explosives would tear through any animated skeletons more than a few weeks old.
                      – Demigan
                      2 hours ago














                      @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                      – Loid Thanead
                      1 hour ago






                      @Demigan Very interesting point, I hadn't thought about their brittleness yet. I might eventually have to handwave the issue by saying the bones are magically reinforced. I'm also interesting in your comment about leather vs. plate. Could you elaborate a little?
                      – Loid Thanead
                      1 hour ago














                      @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                      – Don Pablo
                      46 mins ago




                      @LoidThanead About leather vs. plate, I would say that plate is more used against slashing or piercing weapons, way less useful against bashing ones.
                      – Don Pablo
                      46 mins ago












                      Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                      – Demigan
                      38 mins ago






                      Your skeletons have little to fear from cutting weapons as they are made of bone. A plate armor resting on the bones will deliver far higher forces on a few points and break those bones, especially without Meat and muscle inbetween to reduce the impact. Blunt instruments and even holding the sword at the blade to smash with the pommel became a better way to kill plate armored targets than cutting and slashing weapons during medieval times. Leather will spread the force out more, even from a cutting weapon. This offers better protection for skeletons who dont fear the cut of a sworf or arrow.
                      – Demigan
                      38 mins ago













                      5














                      A demolition crane would give you the relative safety of not engaging the skeletons in close combat and the tool to crush many bones in one simple move.



                      enter image description here



                      The disadvantage is than the crane cannot move very fast (although it's not very slow either), so she needs help against big groups.




                      • Swiping the cranes head in an arc closely above ground can be used to knock enemies down

                      • Helpers with pitchforks, nets or Tim B's proposed foam guns can keep the enemies away from the crane while it crushes one after the other in quick succession.




                      Pros




                      • No ammunition or supplies needed during a fight

                      • destroys bones and armor alike

                      • attacks quickly and efficient

                      • several meters reach and not stationary

                      • Protected against arrows and other weapons

                      • Can be utilized for different attacks like throwing boulders at enemies as well


                      Cons




                      • Helpers needed to fight larger groups (or you risk being overrun)

                      • Not very agile on the battlefield

                      • Vocal communication difficult because of the loud machine






                      share|improve this answer


























                        5














                        A demolition crane would give you the relative safety of not engaging the skeletons in close combat and the tool to crush many bones in one simple move.



                        enter image description here



                        The disadvantage is than the crane cannot move very fast (although it's not very slow either), so she needs help against big groups.




                        • Swiping the cranes head in an arc closely above ground can be used to knock enemies down

                        • Helpers with pitchforks, nets or Tim B's proposed foam guns can keep the enemies away from the crane while it crushes one after the other in quick succession.




                        Pros




                        • No ammunition or supplies needed during a fight

                        • destroys bones and armor alike

                        • attacks quickly and efficient

                        • several meters reach and not stationary

                        • Protected against arrows and other weapons

                        • Can be utilized for different attacks like throwing boulders at enemies as well


                        Cons




                        • Helpers needed to fight larger groups (or you risk being overrun)

                        • Not very agile on the battlefield

                        • Vocal communication difficult because of the loud machine






                        share|improve this answer
























                          5












                          5








                          5






                          A demolition crane would give you the relative safety of not engaging the skeletons in close combat and the tool to crush many bones in one simple move.



                          enter image description here



                          The disadvantage is than the crane cannot move very fast (although it's not very slow either), so she needs help against big groups.




                          • Swiping the cranes head in an arc closely above ground can be used to knock enemies down

                          • Helpers with pitchforks, nets or Tim B's proposed foam guns can keep the enemies away from the crane while it crushes one after the other in quick succession.




                          Pros




                          • No ammunition or supplies needed during a fight

                          • destroys bones and armor alike

                          • attacks quickly and efficient

                          • several meters reach and not stationary

                          • Protected against arrows and other weapons

                          • Can be utilized for different attacks like throwing boulders at enemies as well


                          Cons




                          • Helpers needed to fight larger groups (or you risk being overrun)

                          • Not very agile on the battlefield

                          • Vocal communication difficult because of the loud machine






                          share|improve this answer












                          A demolition crane would give you the relative safety of not engaging the skeletons in close combat and the tool to crush many bones in one simple move.



                          enter image description here



                          The disadvantage is than the crane cannot move very fast (although it's not very slow either), so she needs help against big groups.




                          • Swiping the cranes head in an arc closely above ground can be used to knock enemies down

                          • Helpers with pitchforks, nets or Tim B's proposed foam guns can keep the enemies away from the crane while it crushes one after the other in quick succession.




                          Pros




                          • No ammunition or supplies needed during a fight

                          • destroys bones and armor alike

                          • attacks quickly and efficient

                          • several meters reach and not stationary

                          • Protected against arrows and other weapons

                          • Can be utilized for different attacks like throwing boulders at enemies as well


                          Cons




                          • Helpers needed to fight larger groups (or you risk being overrun)

                          • Not very agile on the battlefield

                          • Vocal communication difficult because of the loud machine







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          ElmyElmy

                          9,91911745




                          9,91911745























                              5














                              Forget military equipment, use construction equipment.



                              A fleet of back-hoes to dig pits, bull dozers to shove them in, Dump trucks to drop in asphalt, you have a public works project that solves your problem for both roads and armies.



                              The hot asphalt dropped down after the skeletons were pushed in would stick them together, trapping them in, if any were able to make it out, the bulldozers could take care of them. Or, steamrollers could flatten them. Mace-men could handle any that slip past, or climb up onto the vehicles.



                              Plus, it adds a bit of comic relief to what could be built up as a terrifying situation.






                              share|improve this answer


























                                5














                                Forget military equipment, use construction equipment.



                                A fleet of back-hoes to dig pits, bull dozers to shove them in, Dump trucks to drop in asphalt, you have a public works project that solves your problem for both roads and armies.



                                The hot asphalt dropped down after the skeletons were pushed in would stick them together, trapping them in, if any were able to make it out, the bulldozers could take care of them. Or, steamrollers could flatten them. Mace-men could handle any that slip past, or climb up onto the vehicles.



                                Plus, it adds a bit of comic relief to what could be built up as a terrifying situation.






                                share|improve this answer
























                                  5












                                  5








                                  5






                                  Forget military equipment, use construction equipment.



                                  A fleet of back-hoes to dig pits, bull dozers to shove them in, Dump trucks to drop in asphalt, you have a public works project that solves your problem for both roads and armies.



                                  The hot asphalt dropped down after the skeletons were pushed in would stick them together, trapping them in, if any were able to make it out, the bulldozers could take care of them. Or, steamrollers could flatten them. Mace-men could handle any that slip past, or climb up onto the vehicles.



                                  Plus, it adds a bit of comic relief to what could be built up as a terrifying situation.






                                  share|improve this answer












                                  Forget military equipment, use construction equipment.



                                  A fleet of back-hoes to dig pits, bull dozers to shove them in, Dump trucks to drop in asphalt, you have a public works project that solves your problem for both roads and armies.



                                  The hot asphalt dropped down after the skeletons were pushed in would stick them together, trapping them in, if any were able to make it out, the bulldozers could take care of them. Or, steamrollers could flatten them. Mace-men could handle any that slip past, or climb up onto the vehicles.



                                  Plus, it adds a bit of comic relief to what could be built up as a terrifying situation.







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered 1 hour ago









                                  Don Thermidor_Lobster MobsterDon Thermidor_Lobster Mobster

                                  4,415628




                                  4,415628























                                      1














                                      For large scale destruction using bombs would be effective but it wouldn't completely destroy any skeletons they hit so i would suggest attempting to capture them and then either powder-rising them with a car compactor, something of that ilk or chucking them into an incinerator therefor completely destroying them which is what you want to do. for smaller spaces like a town... create a small ramming device that can be held that transmits a force into a target it is in contact with pulverising it. other than that, high velocity spinning blades that pulverise anything they touch, or just break it it don't mater, the objective is to destroy not injure until dead like a human.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                      • You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                        – Loid Thanead
                                        5 hours ago
















                                      1














                                      For large scale destruction using bombs would be effective but it wouldn't completely destroy any skeletons they hit so i would suggest attempting to capture them and then either powder-rising them with a car compactor, something of that ilk or chucking them into an incinerator therefor completely destroying them which is what you want to do. for smaller spaces like a town... create a small ramming device that can be held that transmits a force into a target it is in contact with pulverising it. other than that, high velocity spinning blades that pulverise anything they touch, or just break it it don't mater, the objective is to destroy not injure until dead like a human.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                      • You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                        – Loid Thanead
                                        5 hours ago














                                      1












                                      1








                                      1






                                      For large scale destruction using bombs would be effective but it wouldn't completely destroy any skeletons they hit so i would suggest attempting to capture them and then either powder-rising them with a car compactor, something of that ilk or chucking them into an incinerator therefor completely destroying them which is what you want to do. for smaller spaces like a town... create a small ramming device that can be held that transmits a force into a target it is in contact with pulverising it. other than that, high velocity spinning blades that pulverise anything they touch, or just break it it don't mater, the objective is to destroy not injure until dead like a human.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      For large scale destruction using bombs would be effective but it wouldn't completely destroy any skeletons they hit so i would suggest attempting to capture them and then either powder-rising them with a car compactor, something of that ilk or chucking them into an incinerator therefor completely destroying them which is what you want to do. for smaller spaces like a town... create a small ramming device that can be held that transmits a force into a target it is in contact with pulverising it. other than that, high velocity spinning blades that pulverise anything they touch, or just break it it don't mater, the objective is to destroy not injure until dead like a human.







                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer






                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered 5 hours ago









                                      Dylan BullDylan Bull

                                      392




                                      392




                                      New contributor




                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      Dylan Bull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                      • You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                        – Loid Thanead
                                        5 hours ago


















                                      • You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                        – Loid Thanead
                                        5 hours ago
















                                      You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                      – Loid Thanead
                                      5 hours ago




                                      You are right that incinerating or crushing them would destroy them. However, how would you capture them in the first place, assuming they are actively fighting back?
                                      – Loid Thanead
                                      5 hours ago











                                      1














                                      If (like the question suggests) the protagonist understands enough about A.I. and robotics, I would conjure up some terminators (T800; the liquid metal of the T1000 and such is most likely something the protagonist does not understand, mostly because I doubt it is possible).



                                      Terminators are robust enough to take a beating and more than strong enough to pull two bones apart (no need to break the bones; a single bone cannot do anything on its own, it needs to be joined to another to actually do things) even without weapons. Arm them with melee weapons and the terminators become even more destructive.



                                      As for putting the terminators to work, they can go into buildings to clear them, run around the fields to attack large groups of skeletons, basically anything a human can - just much better. And if defeated, you know they'll be back.



                                      Added advantage: once the skeletons are taken care of, the protagonist won't have to explain where she got that strange magic device she used to take care of the enemy, because she simply got help from an army from across the mountains (or sea, or whatever you want). Sure they look a bit strange, but they look human enough not to cause suspicion in the aftermath. Unconjure them (or keep a few and rule the lands) and you're done.






                                      share|improve this answer


























                                        1














                                        If (like the question suggests) the protagonist understands enough about A.I. and robotics, I would conjure up some terminators (T800; the liquid metal of the T1000 and such is most likely something the protagonist does not understand, mostly because I doubt it is possible).



                                        Terminators are robust enough to take a beating and more than strong enough to pull two bones apart (no need to break the bones; a single bone cannot do anything on its own, it needs to be joined to another to actually do things) even without weapons. Arm them with melee weapons and the terminators become even more destructive.



                                        As for putting the terminators to work, they can go into buildings to clear them, run around the fields to attack large groups of skeletons, basically anything a human can - just much better. And if defeated, you know they'll be back.



                                        Added advantage: once the skeletons are taken care of, the protagonist won't have to explain where she got that strange magic device she used to take care of the enemy, because she simply got help from an army from across the mountains (or sea, or whatever you want). Sure they look a bit strange, but they look human enough not to cause suspicion in the aftermath. Unconjure them (or keep a few and rule the lands) and you're done.






                                        share|improve this answer
























                                          1












                                          1








                                          1






                                          If (like the question suggests) the protagonist understands enough about A.I. and robotics, I would conjure up some terminators (T800; the liquid metal of the T1000 and such is most likely something the protagonist does not understand, mostly because I doubt it is possible).



                                          Terminators are robust enough to take a beating and more than strong enough to pull two bones apart (no need to break the bones; a single bone cannot do anything on its own, it needs to be joined to another to actually do things) even without weapons. Arm them with melee weapons and the terminators become even more destructive.



                                          As for putting the terminators to work, they can go into buildings to clear them, run around the fields to attack large groups of skeletons, basically anything a human can - just much better. And if defeated, you know they'll be back.



                                          Added advantage: once the skeletons are taken care of, the protagonist won't have to explain where she got that strange magic device she used to take care of the enemy, because she simply got help from an army from across the mountains (or sea, or whatever you want). Sure they look a bit strange, but they look human enough not to cause suspicion in the aftermath. Unconjure them (or keep a few and rule the lands) and you're done.






                                          share|improve this answer












                                          If (like the question suggests) the protagonist understands enough about A.I. and robotics, I would conjure up some terminators (T800; the liquid metal of the T1000 and such is most likely something the protagonist does not understand, mostly because I doubt it is possible).



                                          Terminators are robust enough to take a beating and more than strong enough to pull two bones apart (no need to break the bones; a single bone cannot do anything on its own, it needs to be joined to another to actually do things) even without weapons. Arm them with melee weapons and the terminators become even more destructive.



                                          As for putting the terminators to work, they can go into buildings to clear them, run around the fields to attack large groups of skeletons, basically anything a human can - just much better. And if defeated, you know they'll be back.



                                          Added advantage: once the skeletons are taken care of, the protagonist won't have to explain where she got that strange magic device she used to take care of the enemy, because she simply got help from an army from across the mountains (or sea, or whatever you want). Sure they look a bit strange, but they look human enough not to cause suspicion in the aftermath. Unconjure them (or keep a few and rule the lands) and you're done.







                                          share|improve this answer












                                          share|improve this answer



                                          share|improve this answer










                                          answered 49 mins ago









                                          Jory GeertsJory Geerts

                                          1213




                                          1213























                                              0














                                              First thing that comes to mind is chain shot. Two cannon balls joined with a length of chain. Originally used to bring down the masts of sailing ships, I imagine a volley of those through the middle of a skeleton horde would do sufficient damage that the shovel-and-cudgel brigade could then wade in for the clean-up work.






                                              share|improve this answer


























                                                0














                                                First thing that comes to mind is chain shot. Two cannon balls joined with a length of chain. Originally used to bring down the masts of sailing ships, I imagine a volley of those through the middle of a skeleton horde would do sufficient damage that the shovel-and-cudgel brigade could then wade in for the clean-up work.






                                                share|improve this answer
























                                                  0












                                                  0








                                                  0






                                                  First thing that comes to mind is chain shot. Two cannon balls joined with a length of chain. Originally used to bring down the masts of sailing ships, I imagine a volley of those through the middle of a skeleton horde would do sufficient damage that the shovel-and-cudgel brigade could then wade in for the clean-up work.






                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  First thing that comes to mind is chain shot. Two cannon balls joined with a length of chain. Originally used to bring down the masts of sailing ships, I imagine a volley of those through the middle of a skeleton horde would do sufficient damage that the shovel-and-cudgel brigade could then wade in for the clean-up work.







                                                  share|improve this answer












                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer










                                                  answered 1 hour ago









                                                  TMNTMN

                                                  86937




                                                  86937























                                                      0














                                                      Bludgeoning weapons and basically any high-powered explosives. Sledgehammers should be pretty good at breaking the bones, and enough TNT can reduce skeletons to piles of white powder in seconds.






                                                      share|improve this answer


























                                                        0














                                                        Bludgeoning weapons and basically any high-powered explosives. Sledgehammers should be pretty good at breaking the bones, and enough TNT can reduce skeletons to piles of white powder in seconds.






                                                        share|improve this answer
























                                                          0












                                                          0








                                                          0






                                                          Bludgeoning weapons and basically any high-powered explosives. Sledgehammers should be pretty good at breaking the bones, and enough TNT can reduce skeletons to piles of white powder in seconds.






                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                          Bludgeoning weapons and basically any high-powered explosives. Sledgehammers should be pretty good at breaking the bones, and enough TNT can reduce skeletons to piles of white powder in seconds.







                                                          share|improve this answer












                                                          share|improve this answer



                                                          share|improve this answer










                                                          answered 53 mins ago









                                                          The Weasel SagasThe Weasel Sagas

                                                          1,137121




                                                          1,137121






















                                                              Loid Thanead is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                                              draft saved

                                                              draft discarded


















                                                              Loid Thanead is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                                              Loid Thanead is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                                              Loid Thanead is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                              But avoid



                                                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136083%2fwhat-modern-weapons-could-be-used-to-destroy-skeletal-enemies-as-completely-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown