If a druid in Wild Shape swallows a creature whole, then turns back to her normal form, what happens?












3












$begingroup$


Our goblin druid posed a question today which made our DM bluescreen:



"If I turned into a giant toad, swallowed a Medium-sized creature whole, and then turned back, what happens?"



The goblin druid is a Small creature, and the giant toad is a Large creature. The creature being swallowed is Medium-sized.



This is essentially the inverse of this question, though not quite a duplicate because it's the eating creature doing the shapeshifting rather than the eaten one. Closely related to this question, with the primary difference being wildshape by a willing druid vs polymorph of an unwilling monster.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
    $endgroup$
    – thatgirldm
    3 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


Our goblin druid posed a question today which made our DM bluescreen:



"If I turned into a giant toad, swallowed a Medium-sized creature whole, and then turned back, what happens?"



The goblin druid is a Small creature, and the giant toad is a Large creature. The creature being swallowed is Medium-sized.



This is essentially the inverse of this question, though not quite a duplicate because it's the eating creature doing the shapeshifting rather than the eaten one. Closely related to this question, with the primary difference being wildshape by a willing druid vs polymorph of an unwilling monster.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
    $endgroup$
    – thatgirldm
    3 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Our goblin druid posed a question today which made our DM bluescreen:



"If I turned into a giant toad, swallowed a Medium-sized creature whole, and then turned back, what happens?"



The goblin druid is a Small creature, and the giant toad is a Large creature. The creature being swallowed is Medium-sized.



This is essentially the inverse of this question, though not quite a duplicate because it's the eating creature doing the shapeshifting rather than the eaten one. Closely related to this question, with the primary difference being wildshape by a willing druid vs polymorph of an unwilling monster.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Our goblin druid posed a question today which made our DM bluescreen:



"If I turned into a giant toad, swallowed a Medium-sized creature whole, and then turned back, what happens?"



The goblin druid is a Small creature, and the giant toad is a Large creature. The creature being swallowed is Medium-sized.



This is essentially the inverse of this question, though not quite a duplicate because it's the eating creature doing the shapeshifting rather than the eaten one. Closely related to this question, with the primary difference being wildshape by a willing druid vs polymorph of an unwilling monster.







dnd-5e rules-as-written druid wild-shape






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









V2Blast

23.5k375147




23.5k375147










asked 4 hours ago









thatgirldmthatgirldm

15.3k25569




15.3k25569








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
    $endgroup$
    – thatgirldm
    3 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
    $endgroup$
    – thatgirldm
    3 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Given the [rules-as-written] tag, are you looking for a strict literalist interpretation of the rules, even when it leads to absurd interpretations? Or is it just meant as a regular rules question?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
$endgroup$
– thatgirldm
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
We are most interested in whether there is any rule around this, since neither linked question cites strict rules. Absurd is fine (the situation is somewhat absurd to begin with :) ).
$endgroup$
– thatgirldm
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

When a target of an effect ceases to be a valid target it is no longer affected



A giant toad can swallow a creature, your druid cannot - as per the effect, I mean. Obviously, the druid can swallow things that a goblin could swallow - things I don't want to think about.



As the druid transforms from giant toad to goblin the swallowing ends. Feel free to describe how this happens in as much nauseating detail as you like.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    RAW - the only interpretation can be taken from the equipment section of the Wildshape description (emphasis mine):




    You choose whether your Equipment falls to the ground in your space, merges into your new form, or is worn by it. Worn Equipment functions as normal, but the DM decides whether it is practical for the new form to wear a piece of Equipment, based on the creature's shape and size. Your Equipment doesn't change size or shape to match the new form, and any Equipment that the new form can't wear must either fall to the ground or merge with it. Equipment that merges with the form has no effect until you leave the form.




    Albeit, this is referencing equipment that is worn by the druid when shifting into a beast form. So for example, your gnome druid would not be able to keep wearing its leather armour - the toad form is too big to wear it. So it must either be dropped, or merge with the transformation.



    This could work the same way in reverse. Upon transforming back into the gnome, the medium creature would either be merged with your PC, or dropped (i.e., regurgitated).



    Again, this will probably have to be ruled by your DM.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      What happens is called flatus



      The character ate a large meal without allowing time to digest it as a giant frog. Had they stayed in that form longer, the normal frog digestion would render this problem moot.



      But since they switched back to humanoid form too quickly, they are not just "full" but "really full" along the lines of eating three pizzas. Expect a passage of wind anon.



      RAW there isn't an answer for this.



      I thus recommend the above ruling to fill in the gap that RAW failed to foresee, which was "eating something bigger than your head."



      At a time like this, rely on RAF rather than RAW.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "122"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142368%2fif-a-druid-in-wild-shape-swallows-a-creature-whole-then-turns-back-to-her-norma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        When a target of an effect ceases to be a valid target it is no longer affected



        A giant toad can swallow a creature, your druid cannot - as per the effect, I mean. Obviously, the druid can swallow things that a goblin could swallow - things I don't want to think about.



        As the druid transforms from giant toad to goblin the swallowing ends. Feel free to describe how this happens in as much nauseating detail as you like.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          When a target of an effect ceases to be a valid target it is no longer affected



          A giant toad can swallow a creature, your druid cannot - as per the effect, I mean. Obviously, the druid can swallow things that a goblin could swallow - things I don't want to think about.



          As the druid transforms from giant toad to goblin the swallowing ends. Feel free to describe how this happens in as much nauseating detail as you like.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            When a target of an effect ceases to be a valid target it is no longer affected



            A giant toad can swallow a creature, your druid cannot - as per the effect, I mean. Obviously, the druid can swallow things that a goblin could swallow - things I don't want to think about.



            As the druid transforms from giant toad to goblin the swallowing ends. Feel free to describe how this happens in as much nauseating detail as you like.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            When a target of an effect ceases to be a valid target it is no longer affected



            A giant toad can swallow a creature, your druid cannot - as per the effect, I mean. Obviously, the druid can swallow things that a goblin could swallow - things I don't want to think about.



            As the druid transforms from giant toad to goblin the swallowing ends. Feel free to describe how this happens in as much nauseating detail as you like.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 3 hours ago









            Dale MDale M

            108k21277476




            108k21277476

























                0












                $begingroup$

                RAW - the only interpretation can be taken from the equipment section of the Wildshape description (emphasis mine):




                You choose whether your Equipment falls to the ground in your space, merges into your new form, or is worn by it. Worn Equipment functions as normal, but the DM decides whether it is practical for the new form to wear a piece of Equipment, based on the creature's shape and size. Your Equipment doesn't change size or shape to match the new form, and any Equipment that the new form can't wear must either fall to the ground or merge with it. Equipment that merges with the form has no effect until you leave the form.




                Albeit, this is referencing equipment that is worn by the druid when shifting into a beast form. So for example, your gnome druid would not be able to keep wearing its leather armour - the toad form is too big to wear it. So it must either be dropped, or merge with the transformation.



                This could work the same way in reverse. Upon transforming back into the gnome, the medium creature would either be merged with your PC, or dropped (i.e., regurgitated).



                Again, this will probably have to be ruled by your DM.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  RAW - the only interpretation can be taken from the equipment section of the Wildshape description (emphasis mine):




                  You choose whether your Equipment falls to the ground in your space, merges into your new form, or is worn by it. Worn Equipment functions as normal, but the DM decides whether it is practical for the new form to wear a piece of Equipment, based on the creature's shape and size. Your Equipment doesn't change size or shape to match the new form, and any Equipment that the new form can't wear must either fall to the ground or merge with it. Equipment that merges with the form has no effect until you leave the form.




                  Albeit, this is referencing equipment that is worn by the druid when shifting into a beast form. So for example, your gnome druid would not be able to keep wearing its leather armour - the toad form is too big to wear it. So it must either be dropped, or merge with the transformation.



                  This could work the same way in reverse. Upon transforming back into the gnome, the medium creature would either be merged with your PC, or dropped (i.e., regurgitated).



                  Again, this will probably have to be ruled by your DM.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    RAW - the only interpretation can be taken from the equipment section of the Wildshape description (emphasis mine):




                    You choose whether your Equipment falls to the ground in your space, merges into your new form, or is worn by it. Worn Equipment functions as normal, but the DM decides whether it is practical for the new form to wear a piece of Equipment, based on the creature's shape and size. Your Equipment doesn't change size or shape to match the new form, and any Equipment that the new form can't wear must either fall to the ground or merge with it. Equipment that merges with the form has no effect until you leave the form.




                    Albeit, this is referencing equipment that is worn by the druid when shifting into a beast form. So for example, your gnome druid would not be able to keep wearing its leather armour - the toad form is too big to wear it. So it must either be dropped, or merge with the transformation.



                    This could work the same way in reverse. Upon transforming back into the gnome, the medium creature would either be merged with your PC, or dropped (i.e., regurgitated).



                    Again, this will probably have to be ruled by your DM.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    RAW - the only interpretation can be taken from the equipment section of the Wildshape description (emphasis mine):




                    You choose whether your Equipment falls to the ground in your space, merges into your new form, or is worn by it. Worn Equipment functions as normal, but the DM decides whether it is practical for the new form to wear a piece of Equipment, based on the creature's shape and size. Your Equipment doesn't change size or shape to match the new form, and any Equipment that the new form can't wear must either fall to the ground or merge with it. Equipment that merges with the form has no effect until you leave the form.




                    Albeit, this is referencing equipment that is worn by the druid when shifting into a beast form. So for example, your gnome druid would not be able to keep wearing its leather armour - the toad form is too big to wear it. So it must either be dropped, or merge with the transformation.



                    This could work the same way in reverse. Upon transforming back into the gnome, the medium creature would either be merged with your PC, or dropped (i.e., regurgitated).



                    Again, this will probably have to be ruled by your DM.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 3 hours ago









                    BenBen

                    10.7k1566134




                    10.7k1566134























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        What happens is called flatus



                        The character ate a large meal without allowing time to digest it as a giant frog. Had they stayed in that form longer, the normal frog digestion would render this problem moot.



                        But since they switched back to humanoid form too quickly, they are not just "full" but "really full" along the lines of eating three pizzas. Expect a passage of wind anon.



                        RAW there isn't an answer for this.



                        I thus recommend the above ruling to fill in the gap that RAW failed to foresee, which was "eating something bigger than your head."



                        At a time like this, rely on RAF rather than RAW.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          What happens is called flatus



                          The character ate a large meal without allowing time to digest it as a giant frog. Had they stayed in that form longer, the normal frog digestion would render this problem moot.



                          But since they switched back to humanoid form too quickly, they are not just "full" but "really full" along the lines of eating three pizzas. Expect a passage of wind anon.



                          RAW there isn't an answer for this.



                          I thus recommend the above ruling to fill in the gap that RAW failed to foresee, which was "eating something bigger than your head."



                          At a time like this, rely on RAF rather than RAW.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            What happens is called flatus



                            The character ate a large meal without allowing time to digest it as a giant frog. Had they stayed in that form longer, the normal frog digestion would render this problem moot.



                            But since they switched back to humanoid form too quickly, they are not just "full" but "really full" along the lines of eating three pizzas. Expect a passage of wind anon.



                            RAW there isn't an answer for this.



                            I thus recommend the above ruling to fill in the gap that RAW failed to foresee, which was "eating something bigger than your head."



                            At a time like this, rely on RAF rather than RAW.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            What happens is called flatus



                            The character ate a large meal without allowing time to digest it as a giant frog. Had they stayed in that form longer, the normal frog digestion would render this problem moot.



                            But since they switched back to humanoid form too quickly, they are not just "full" but "really full" along the lines of eating three pizzas. Expect a passage of wind anon.



                            RAW there isn't an answer for this.



                            I thus recommend the above ruling to fill in the gap that RAW failed to foresee, which was "eating something bigger than your head."



                            At a time like this, rely on RAF rather than RAW.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast

                            80.5k19252434




                            80.5k19252434






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142368%2fif-a-druid-in-wild-shape-swallows-a-creature-whole-then-turns-back-to-her-norma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

                                Single-Malt-Whisky

                                Czorneboh