Can I rely on this github repository files?
I recently found this GitHub repo https://github.com/userEn1gm4/HLuna, but after cloned it I note that the comparison between the file compiled (using g++) from source HLuna.cxx
and the binary included in the repo (HLuna
) is different: differ: byte 25, line 1
. Is the provided binary file secure? I've already analyzed that in VirusTotal without any issues, but I don't have the expertise to decompile and read the output, and I've previously executed the binary provided without thinking about the risks.
reverse-engineering c++ github
New contributor
add a comment |
I recently found this GitHub repo https://github.com/userEn1gm4/HLuna, but after cloned it I note that the comparison between the file compiled (using g++) from source HLuna.cxx
and the binary included in the repo (HLuna
) is different: differ: byte 25, line 1
. Is the provided binary file secure? I've already analyzed that in VirusTotal without any issues, but I don't have the expertise to decompile and read the output, and I've previously executed the binary provided without thinking about the risks.
reverse-engineering c++ github
New contributor
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I recently found this GitHub repo https://github.com/userEn1gm4/HLuna, but after cloned it I note that the comparison between the file compiled (using g++) from source HLuna.cxx
and the binary included in the repo (HLuna
) is different: differ: byte 25, line 1
. Is the provided binary file secure? I've already analyzed that in VirusTotal without any issues, but I don't have the expertise to decompile and read the output, and I've previously executed the binary provided without thinking about the risks.
reverse-engineering c++ github
New contributor
I recently found this GitHub repo https://github.com/userEn1gm4/HLuna, but after cloned it I note that the comparison between the file compiled (using g++) from source HLuna.cxx
and the binary included in the repo (HLuna
) is different: differ: byte 25, line 1
. Is the provided binary file secure? I've already analyzed that in VirusTotal without any issues, but I don't have the expertise to decompile and read the output, and I've previously executed the binary provided without thinking about the risks.
reverse-engineering c++ github
reverse-engineering c++ github
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
schroeder♦
77.9k30173209
77.9k30173209
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
mcruz2401mcruz2401
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago
add a comment |
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Compilation is not a directly verifiable deterministic process across compiler versions, library versions, operating systems, or a number of other different variables. The only way to verify is to perform a diff at the assembly level. There are lots of tools that can do this but you still need to put the manual work in.
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "162"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
mcruz2401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206000%2fcan-i-rely-on-this-github-repository-files%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Compilation is not a directly verifiable deterministic process across compiler versions, library versions, operating systems, or a number of other different variables. The only way to verify is to perform a diff at the assembly level. There are lots of tools that can do this but you still need to put the manual work in.
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Compilation is not a directly verifiable deterministic process across compiler versions, library versions, operating systems, or a number of other different variables. The only way to verify is to perform a diff at the assembly level. There are lots of tools that can do this but you still need to put the manual work in.
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Compilation is not a directly verifiable deterministic process across compiler versions, library versions, operating systems, or a number of other different variables. The only way to verify is to perform a diff at the assembly level. There are lots of tools that can do this but you still need to put the manual work in.
Compilation is not a directly verifiable deterministic process across compiler versions, library versions, operating systems, or a number of other different variables. The only way to verify is to perform a diff at the assembly level. There are lots of tools that can do this but you still need to put the manual work in.
answered 6 hours ago
PolynomialPolynomial
101k31246339
101k31246339
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
Even that isn't going to be reliable across optimization levels.
– chrylis
25 mins ago
add a comment |
mcruz2401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mcruz2401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mcruz2401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
mcruz2401 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206000%2fcan-i-rely-on-this-github-repository-files%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If you're able to compile from source, then just use your computer version.
– Daisetsu
1 hour ago