What is the best design for dynamic assignment of locations for variable sized grid boxes to occupy?
I want to build a database that will have limited single locations to put boxes. It's divided by lanes and bays.
Imagine a 4x4 grid, with a total of 16 slots, and every time I query the tables, I want to return one location for me to put boxes down.
My approach is to have every slot named and stored in database. And have a flag "occupied" and name for the box to keep track of the box location. The tricky part is there is different sizes of boxes. Some will occupied 3 slots, some will occupy 2 slots and some will occupy 1 slot.
How can I design the database structure so that it's easier for me to query the next available slot based on the size?
Responses to comments
Is this some resource scheduling application?
It's more like a dynamic space allocation application.
Are the boxes to be allocated are mono- or bi-dimensional? In other words, do you allocate a space of 2x2 boxes or 4 boxes? In the second case, can you allocate both "horizontally" and "vertically"?
You can only go one way, neither, entire locations is either they go all horizontally or all vertically, they can never be both. Just the size is different, it can occupy 1 slot, 2 slots or 3 slots, but once it is occupied, it can never be used for another box, unless the previous box removed.
Boxes can be placed in the grid horizontally for an entire grid, you can have another grid that can put boxes down vertically. Once a grid is set for this property, it will stay like that.
Do you have some kind of classification regarding the boxes sizes? Do you have, as stated in comments, only three different sizes of boxes? In case you do not have it, I think that such classification is necessary in order to ensure compatibility between the boxes and the grids (via the “slots”), and it is also necessary to take into account the common dimensions: width, height and depth.
The boxes can allocate 1 slot, or 2 slots or 3 slots, it depends on the size.
Are the grids fixed to 4x4 exclusively?
Actually 4X4 is a simplified example I gave. The actual size could be 31X8, imagine OOOOOOOO X31 and 8 lanes of those.
Are you planning to include different types of grids (for instance, 5x3, 10x10, 6x4, etc.) in the future?
The size won't be changed very often. It's pretty set, if there is space increase, I can always add them.
What is the meaning of the terms bays and lanes in your business context?
Bays and lanes are just terms to distinguish the X, and Y. On a 31 slots per lane, and 8 lanes in each grid. OOOOOOOO X 31 and 8 lanes of these next to each other vertically, bay means each of the "O", and lane is 8 lanes for each row of 31 "O".
sql-server database-design sql-server-2008-r2
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I want to build a database that will have limited single locations to put boxes. It's divided by lanes and bays.
Imagine a 4x4 grid, with a total of 16 slots, and every time I query the tables, I want to return one location for me to put boxes down.
My approach is to have every slot named and stored in database. And have a flag "occupied" and name for the box to keep track of the box location. The tricky part is there is different sizes of boxes. Some will occupied 3 slots, some will occupy 2 slots and some will occupy 1 slot.
How can I design the database structure so that it's easier for me to query the next available slot based on the size?
Responses to comments
Is this some resource scheduling application?
It's more like a dynamic space allocation application.
Are the boxes to be allocated are mono- or bi-dimensional? In other words, do you allocate a space of 2x2 boxes or 4 boxes? In the second case, can you allocate both "horizontally" and "vertically"?
You can only go one way, neither, entire locations is either they go all horizontally or all vertically, they can never be both. Just the size is different, it can occupy 1 slot, 2 slots or 3 slots, but once it is occupied, it can never be used for another box, unless the previous box removed.
Boxes can be placed in the grid horizontally for an entire grid, you can have another grid that can put boxes down vertically. Once a grid is set for this property, it will stay like that.
Do you have some kind of classification regarding the boxes sizes? Do you have, as stated in comments, only three different sizes of boxes? In case you do not have it, I think that such classification is necessary in order to ensure compatibility between the boxes and the grids (via the “slots”), and it is also necessary to take into account the common dimensions: width, height and depth.
The boxes can allocate 1 slot, or 2 slots or 3 slots, it depends on the size.
Are the grids fixed to 4x4 exclusively?
Actually 4X4 is a simplified example I gave. The actual size could be 31X8, imagine OOOOOOOO X31 and 8 lanes of those.
Are you planning to include different types of grids (for instance, 5x3, 10x10, 6x4, etc.) in the future?
The size won't be changed very often. It's pretty set, if there is space increase, I can always add them.
What is the meaning of the terms bays and lanes in your business context?
Bays and lanes are just terms to distinguish the X, and Y. On a 31 slots per lane, and 8 lanes in each grid. OOOOOOOO X 31 and 8 lanes of these next to each other vertically, bay means each of the "O", and lane is 8 lanes for each row of 31 "O".
sql-server database-design sql-server-2008-r2
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I want to build a database that will have limited single locations to put boxes. It's divided by lanes and bays.
Imagine a 4x4 grid, with a total of 16 slots, and every time I query the tables, I want to return one location for me to put boxes down.
My approach is to have every slot named and stored in database. And have a flag "occupied" and name for the box to keep track of the box location. The tricky part is there is different sizes of boxes. Some will occupied 3 slots, some will occupy 2 slots and some will occupy 1 slot.
How can I design the database structure so that it's easier for me to query the next available slot based on the size?
Responses to comments
Is this some resource scheduling application?
It's more like a dynamic space allocation application.
Are the boxes to be allocated are mono- or bi-dimensional? In other words, do you allocate a space of 2x2 boxes or 4 boxes? In the second case, can you allocate both "horizontally" and "vertically"?
You can only go one way, neither, entire locations is either they go all horizontally or all vertically, they can never be both. Just the size is different, it can occupy 1 slot, 2 slots or 3 slots, but once it is occupied, it can never be used for another box, unless the previous box removed.
Boxes can be placed in the grid horizontally for an entire grid, you can have another grid that can put boxes down vertically. Once a grid is set for this property, it will stay like that.
Do you have some kind of classification regarding the boxes sizes? Do you have, as stated in comments, only three different sizes of boxes? In case you do not have it, I think that such classification is necessary in order to ensure compatibility between the boxes and the grids (via the “slots”), and it is also necessary to take into account the common dimensions: width, height and depth.
The boxes can allocate 1 slot, or 2 slots or 3 slots, it depends on the size.
Are the grids fixed to 4x4 exclusively?
Actually 4X4 is a simplified example I gave. The actual size could be 31X8, imagine OOOOOOOO X31 and 8 lanes of those.
Are you planning to include different types of grids (for instance, 5x3, 10x10, 6x4, etc.) in the future?
The size won't be changed very often. It's pretty set, if there is space increase, I can always add them.
What is the meaning of the terms bays and lanes in your business context?
Bays and lanes are just terms to distinguish the X, and Y. On a 31 slots per lane, and 8 lanes in each grid. OOOOOOOO X 31 and 8 lanes of these next to each other vertically, bay means each of the "O", and lane is 8 lanes for each row of 31 "O".
sql-server database-design sql-server-2008-r2
I want to build a database that will have limited single locations to put boxes. It's divided by lanes and bays.
Imagine a 4x4 grid, with a total of 16 slots, and every time I query the tables, I want to return one location for me to put boxes down.
My approach is to have every slot named and stored in database. And have a flag "occupied" and name for the box to keep track of the box location. The tricky part is there is different sizes of boxes. Some will occupied 3 slots, some will occupy 2 slots and some will occupy 1 slot.
How can I design the database structure so that it's easier for me to query the next available slot based on the size?
Responses to comments
Is this some resource scheduling application?
It's more like a dynamic space allocation application.
Are the boxes to be allocated are mono- or bi-dimensional? In other words, do you allocate a space of 2x2 boxes or 4 boxes? In the second case, can you allocate both "horizontally" and "vertically"?
You can only go one way, neither, entire locations is either they go all horizontally or all vertically, they can never be both. Just the size is different, it can occupy 1 slot, 2 slots or 3 slots, but once it is occupied, it can never be used for another box, unless the previous box removed.
Boxes can be placed in the grid horizontally for an entire grid, you can have another grid that can put boxes down vertically. Once a grid is set for this property, it will stay like that.
Do you have some kind of classification regarding the boxes sizes? Do you have, as stated in comments, only three different sizes of boxes? In case you do not have it, I think that such classification is necessary in order to ensure compatibility between the boxes and the grids (via the “slots”), and it is also necessary to take into account the common dimensions: width, height and depth.
The boxes can allocate 1 slot, or 2 slots or 3 slots, it depends on the size.
Are the grids fixed to 4x4 exclusively?
Actually 4X4 is a simplified example I gave. The actual size could be 31X8, imagine OOOOOOOO X31 and 8 lanes of those.
Are you planning to include different types of grids (for instance, 5x3, 10x10, 6x4, etc.) in the future?
The size won't be changed very often. It's pretty set, if there is space increase, I can always add them.
What is the meaning of the terms bays and lanes in your business context?
Bays and lanes are just terms to distinguish the X, and Y. On a 31 slots per lane, and 8 lanes in each grid. OOOOOOOO X 31 and 8 lanes of these next to each other vertically, bay means each of the "O", and lane is 8 lanes for each row of 31 "O".
sql-server database-design sql-server-2008-r2
sql-server database-design sql-server-2008-r2
edited Apr 12 '17 at 17:32
MDCCL
6,85331745
6,85331745
asked Jun 22 '15 at 9:17
mslugxmslugx
112
112
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is actually an NP-complete problem
You won't find an optimal way to pack your bins, but you can find a good way
Here's Joe Celko's take on it:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bin-packing-problems-the-sql/
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104729%2fwhat-is-the-best-design-for-dynamic-assignment-of-locations-for-variable-sized-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is actually an NP-complete problem
You won't find an optimal way to pack your bins, but you can find a good way
Here's Joe Celko's take on it:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bin-packing-problems-the-sql/
add a comment |
This is actually an NP-complete problem
You won't find an optimal way to pack your bins, but you can find a good way
Here's Joe Celko's take on it:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bin-packing-problems-the-sql/
add a comment |
This is actually an NP-complete problem
You won't find an optimal way to pack your bins, but you can find a good way
Here's Joe Celko's take on it:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bin-packing-problems-the-sql/
This is actually an NP-complete problem
You won't find an optimal way to pack your bins, but you can find a good way
Here's Joe Celko's take on it:
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bin-packing-problems-the-sql/
answered Apr 12 '17 at 22:25
Neil McGuiganNeil McGuigan
5,55432444
5,55432444
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104729%2fwhat-is-the-best-design-for-dynamic-assignment-of-locations-for-variable-sized-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown