How to apply outer limit offset and filters in the subquery to avoid grouping over the complete table used in...












0















I have the following legacy tables:



employee



------------------------------------
| employee_id | name
------------------------------------
| 1 | David
| 2 | Mathew
------------------------------------


payroll



-------------------------------------
| employee_id | salary
-------------------------------------
| 2 | 200000
| 3 | 90000
-------------------------------------


I want to get the following data, after joins and filters:



-----------------------------------------------------------
| address_id | employee_id | address
-----------------------------------------------------------
| 1 | 2 | street 1, NY
| 2 | 2 | street 2, DC
------------------------------------------------------------


I have the following query:



SELECT employee_id, salary, address_arr 
FROM employee
LEFT JOIN payroll on payroll.employee_id = employee.employee_id
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT employee_id, ARRAY_AGG(address) as address_arr
FROM addresses
GROUP BY employee_id
) table_address ON table_address.employee_id = employee.employee_id
WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000
LIMIT 100
OFFSET 0


Above query gives the desired output but is highly unoptimized as the GROUP BY operation occurs over the complete addresses table before being used for JOIN operation the outer query.



Kindly answer:




  1. How can we avoid the GROUP BY operation to occurs over the complete
    addresses table by using LIMIT OFFSET of the outer query?

  2. Will the condition WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000 be applied on subquery before or after the GROUP BY operation in the inner query. If the condition is applied after the GROUP BY, how can we avoid that?









share







New contributor




nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    I have the following legacy tables:



    employee



    ------------------------------------
    | employee_id | name
    ------------------------------------
    | 1 | David
    | 2 | Mathew
    ------------------------------------


    payroll



    -------------------------------------
    | employee_id | salary
    -------------------------------------
    | 2 | 200000
    | 3 | 90000
    -------------------------------------


    I want to get the following data, after joins and filters:



    -----------------------------------------------------------
    | address_id | employee_id | address
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    | 1 | 2 | street 1, NY
    | 2 | 2 | street 2, DC
    ------------------------------------------------------------


    I have the following query:



    SELECT employee_id, salary, address_arr 
    FROM employee
    LEFT JOIN payroll on payroll.employee_id = employee.employee_id
    INNER JOIN
    (
    SELECT employee_id, ARRAY_AGG(address) as address_arr
    FROM addresses
    GROUP BY employee_id
    ) table_address ON table_address.employee_id = employee.employee_id
    WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000
    LIMIT 100
    OFFSET 0


    Above query gives the desired output but is highly unoptimized as the GROUP BY operation occurs over the complete addresses table before being used for JOIN operation the outer query.



    Kindly answer:




    1. How can we avoid the GROUP BY operation to occurs over the complete
      addresses table by using LIMIT OFFSET of the outer query?

    2. Will the condition WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000 be applied on subquery before or after the GROUP BY operation in the inner query. If the condition is applied after the GROUP BY, how can we avoid that?









    share







    New contributor




    nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      I have the following legacy tables:



      employee



      ------------------------------------
      | employee_id | name
      ------------------------------------
      | 1 | David
      | 2 | Mathew
      ------------------------------------


      payroll



      -------------------------------------
      | employee_id | salary
      -------------------------------------
      | 2 | 200000
      | 3 | 90000
      -------------------------------------


      I want to get the following data, after joins and filters:



      -----------------------------------------------------------
      | address_id | employee_id | address
      -----------------------------------------------------------
      | 1 | 2 | street 1, NY
      | 2 | 2 | street 2, DC
      ------------------------------------------------------------


      I have the following query:



      SELECT employee_id, salary, address_arr 
      FROM employee
      LEFT JOIN payroll on payroll.employee_id = employee.employee_id
      INNER JOIN
      (
      SELECT employee_id, ARRAY_AGG(address) as address_arr
      FROM addresses
      GROUP BY employee_id
      ) table_address ON table_address.employee_id = employee.employee_id
      WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000
      LIMIT 100
      OFFSET 0


      Above query gives the desired output but is highly unoptimized as the GROUP BY operation occurs over the complete addresses table before being used for JOIN operation the outer query.



      Kindly answer:




      1. How can we avoid the GROUP BY operation to occurs over the complete
        addresses table by using LIMIT OFFSET of the outer query?

      2. Will the condition WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000 be applied on subquery before or after the GROUP BY operation in the inner query. If the condition is applied after the GROUP BY, how can we avoid that?









      share







      New contributor




      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have the following legacy tables:



      employee



      ------------------------------------
      | employee_id | name
      ------------------------------------
      | 1 | David
      | 2 | Mathew
      ------------------------------------


      payroll



      -------------------------------------
      | employee_id | salary
      -------------------------------------
      | 2 | 200000
      | 3 | 90000
      -------------------------------------


      I want to get the following data, after joins and filters:



      -----------------------------------------------------------
      | address_id | employee_id | address
      -----------------------------------------------------------
      | 1 | 2 | street 1, NY
      | 2 | 2 | street 2, DC
      ------------------------------------------------------------


      I have the following query:



      SELECT employee_id, salary, address_arr 
      FROM employee
      LEFT JOIN payroll on payroll.employee_id = employee.employee_id
      INNER JOIN
      (
      SELECT employee_id, ARRAY_AGG(address) as address_arr
      FROM addresses
      GROUP BY employee_id
      ) table_address ON table_address.employee_id = employee.employee_id
      WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000
      LIMIT 100
      OFFSET 0


      Above query gives the desired output but is highly unoptimized as the GROUP BY operation occurs over the complete addresses table before being used for JOIN operation the outer query.



      Kindly answer:




      1. How can we avoid the GROUP BY operation to occurs over the complete
        addresses table by using LIMIT OFFSET of the outer query?

      2. Will the condition WHERE employee.employee_id < 1000000 be applied on subquery before or after the GROUP BY operation in the inner query. If the condition is applied after the GROUP BY, how can we avoid that?







      postgresql join postgresql-performance group-by subquery





      share







      New contributor




      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 mins ago









      nimeshkiranvermanimeshkiranverma

      1012




      1012




      New contributor




      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229214%2fhow-to-apply-outer-limit-offset-and-filters-in-the-subquery-to-avoid-grouping-ov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          nimeshkiranverma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229214%2fhow-to-apply-outer-limit-offset-and-filters-in-the-subquery-to-avoid-grouping-ov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

          Single-Malt-Whisky

          Czorneboh