Optimizing for Modulo Queries












0















I have a use case where I want to be able to query tens of thousands of records for the modulo of a certain field value with another number, i.e. queries like



SELECT * FROM EVENTS WHERE MOD(OFFSET)=5



What are some performance considerations, if any, I should have in place to ensure that my queries are more efficient? Are there any specific kinds of indexes that would speed up this kind of querying?



Has there been a published comparative analysis or benchmark or some kind that has been done for these kinds of queries between various databases? Alternatively, is there a naive way of determining what choice of database would be best suited for this kind of querying?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 42 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.




















    0















    I have a use case where I want to be able to query tens of thousands of records for the modulo of a certain field value with another number, i.e. queries like



    SELECT * FROM EVENTS WHERE MOD(OFFSET)=5



    What are some performance considerations, if any, I should have in place to ensure that my queries are more efficient? Are there any specific kinds of indexes that would speed up this kind of querying?



    Has there been a published comparative analysis or benchmark or some kind that has been done for these kinds of queries between various databases? Alternatively, is there a naive way of determining what choice of database would be best suited for this kind of querying?










    share|improve this question














    bumped to the homepage by Community 42 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      I have a use case where I want to be able to query tens of thousands of records for the modulo of a certain field value with another number, i.e. queries like



      SELECT * FROM EVENTS WHERE MOD(OFFSET)=5



      What are some performance considerations, if any, I should have in place to ensure that my queries are more efficient? Are there any specific kinds of indexes that would speed up this kind of querying?



      Has there been a published comparative analysis or benchmark or some kind that has been done for these kinds of queries between various databases? Alternatively, is there a naive way of determining what choice of database would be best suited for this kind of querying?










      share|improve this question














      I have a use case where I want to be able to query tens of thousands of records for the modulo of a certain field value with another number, i.e. queries like



      SELECT * FROM EVENTS WHERE MOD(OFFSET)=5



      What are some performance considerations, if any, I should have in place to ensure that my queries are more efficient? Are there any specific kinds of indexes that would speed up this kind of querying?



      Has there been a published comparative analysis or benchmark or some kind that has been done for these kinds of queries between various databases? Alternatively, is there a naive way of determining what choice of database would be best suited for this kind of querying?







      mysql postgresql






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 10 '14 at 20:09









      Fareesh VijayarangamFareesh Vijayarangam

      1011




      1011





      bumped to the homepage by Community 42 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 42 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          In Postgres, you can use an index on the expression:



          CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON events (mod(offset, 5));


          Only works for that number, of course. And 5 would be a bad example, because ~ 20 % of the rows would qualify for each possible value, and an index starts paying off for ~ 5 % selected rows or fewer. Otherwise, a sequential scan will be faster.



          Aside: offset is a reserved word. Don't use it as identifier.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The number would not be constant unfortunately

            – Fareesh Vijayarangam
            Dec 10 '14 at 23:39











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84841%2foptimizing-for-modulo-queries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          In Postgres, you can use an index on the expression:



          CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON events (mod(offset, 5));


          Only works for that number, of course. And 5 would be a bad example, because ~ 20 % of the rows would qualify for each possible value, and an index starts paying off for ~ 5 % selected rows or fewer. Otherwise, a sequential scan will be faster.



          Aside: offset is a reserved word. Don't use it as identifier.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The number would not be constant unfortunately

            – Fareesh Vijayarangam
            Dec 10 '14 at 23:39
















          0














          In Postgres, you can use an index on the expression:



          CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON events (mod(offset, 5));


          Only works for that number, of course. And 5 would be a bad example, because ~ 20 % of the rows would qualify for each possible value, and an index starts paying off for ~ 5 % selected rows or fewer. Otherwise, a sequential scan will be faster.



          Aside: offset is a reserved word. Don't use it as identifier.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The number would not be constant unfortunately

            – Fareesh Vijayarangam
            Dec 10 '14 at 23:39














          0












          0








          0







          In Postgres, you can use an index on the expression:



          CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON events (mod(offset, 5));


          Only works for that number, of course. And 5 would be a bad example, because ~ 20 % of the rows would qualify for each possible value, and an index starts paying off for ~ 5 % selected rows or fewer. Otherwise, a sequential scan will be faster.



          Aside: offset is a reserved word. Don't use it as identifier.






          share|improve this answer















          In Postgres, you can use an index on the expression:



          CREATE INDEX foo_idx ON events (mod(offset, 5));


          Only works for that number, of course. And 5 would be a bad example, because ~ 20 % of the rows would qualify for each possible value, and an index starts paying off for ~ 5 % selected rows or fewer. Otherwise, a sequential scan will be faster.



          Aside: offset is a reserved word. Don't use it as identifier.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 10 '14 at 20:40

























          answered Dec 10 '14 at 20:34









          Erwin BrandstetterErwin Brandstetter

          93.6k9180294




          93.6k9180294













          • The number would not be constant unfortunately

            – Fareesh Vijayarangam
            Dec 10 '14 at 23:39



















          • The number would not be constant unfortunately

            – Fareesh Vijayarangam
            Dec 10 '14 at 23:39

















          The number would not be constant unfortunately

          – Fareesh Vijayarangam
          Dec 10 '14 at 23:39





          The number would not be constant unfortunately

          – Fareesh Vijayarangam
          Dec 10 '14 at 23:39


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84841%2foptimizing-for-modulo-queries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

          Single-Malt-Whisky

          Czorneboh