SQL Server: Design question - stored records as rows vs as BLOB - NVARCHAR(MAX)
I have posted this question to stackoverflow (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54613295/sql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax) and I was advised to post it here too.
--
I am creating a schedule for our engineer to analyze. The schedules are downloaded each day (automatically by the application on the local machines) and the analysis is done on that local computers.
So, now, I am in this dilemma of storing the schedule in database as table rows or as nvarchar(max).
Here is the requirement
- The schedules are generated each day. Each schedule is accurate to 1 seconds. So, at most, it will contain 86,400 records per schedule.
- In a day, depending on the setting, the system can generate up to 100 schedules per engineer (we have a about 10 engineers)
- The schedule contains the following fields:
INT | INT | INT | INT | NVARCHAR(1024) | NVARCHAR(64) | BIT | BIT | DATETIME | DATETIME
(In summary: 4x INTs, 2x NVARCHARs, 2x BITs, and 2x DATETIMEs) - The schedule is rarely going to be updated, but it can be updated. The updatable fields are: 2x BITs and 1x DATETIME.
Now looking at the common case scenario:
In a day, it will generates about 1,296,000 records per day.
This is the calculation of common case scenario:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 8,640 * 5 * 30 = 1,296,000 records
If I store each schedule as NVARCHAR(MAX) with comma delimited, then the number of records are reduced to only 150 records per day.
Here is the calculation:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows --> stored as NVARCHAR (becomes 1 record)
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 5 * 30 = 150 records
Now, this is the requirement for those schedules:
- The generated schedules can be viewed on the website.
- The schedules is downloaded by the application each day for analysis (analysis is done on local computers).
- The fields (2x BITs) can be updated once the analysis is completed. These fields can be updated by application (after finish analyzing the schedule) or can be updated (manually) by the engineer on the website.
- All generated schedule must be stored for at least 3 months for auditing purposes.
What is your recommendation? Store schedules as table rows OR NVARCHAR(MAX)
sql-server database-design azure-sql-database
New contributor
add a comment |
I have posted this question to stackoverflow (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54613295/sql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax) and I was advised to post it here too.
--
I am creating a schedule for our engineer to analyze. The schedules are downloaded each day (automatically by the application on the local machines) and the analysis is done on that local computers.
So, now, I am in this dilemma of storing the schedule in database as table rows or as nvarchar(max).
Here is the requirement
- The schedules are generated each day. Each schedule is accurate to 1 seconds. So, at most, it will contain 86,400 records per schedule.
- In a day, depending on the setting, the system can generate up to 100 schedules per engineer (we have a about 10 engineers)
- The schedule contains the following fields:
INT | INT | INT | INT | NVARCHAR(1024) | NVARCHAR(64) | BIT | BIT | DATETIME | DATETIME
(In summary: 4x INTs, 2x NVARCHARs, 2x BITs, and 2x DATETIMEs) - The schedule is rarely going to be updated, but it can be updated. The updatable fields are: 2x BITs and 1x DATETIME.
Now looking at the common case scenario:
In a day, it will generates about 1,296,000 records per day.
This is the calculation of common case scenario:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 8,640 * 5 * 30 = 1,296,000 records
If I store each schedule as NVARCHAR(MAX) with comma delimited, then the number of records are reduced to only 150 records per day.
Here is the calculation:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows --> stored as NVARCHAR (becomes 1 record)
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 5 * 30 = 150 records
Now, this is the requirement for those schedules:
- The generated schedules can be viewed on the website.
- The schedules is downloaded by the application each day for analysis (analysis is done on local computers).
- The fields (2x BITs) can be updated once the analysis is completed. These fields can be updated by application (after finish analyzing the schedule) or can be updated (manually) by the engineer on the website.
- All generated schedule must be stored for at least 3 months for auditing purposes.
What is your recommendation? Store schedules as table rows OR NVARCHAR(MAX)
sql-server database-design azure-sql-database
New contributor
add a comment |
I have posted this question to stackoverflow (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54613295/sql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax) and I was advised to post it here too.
--
I am creating a schedule for our engineer to analyze. The schedules are downloaded each day (automatically by the application on the local machines) and the analysis is done on that local computers.
So, now, I am in this dilemma of storing the schedule in database as table rows or as nvarchar(max).
Here is the requirement
- The schedules are generated each day. Each schedule is accurate to 1 seconds. So, at most, it will contain 86,400 records per schedule.
- In a day, depending on the setting, the system can generate up to 100 schedules per engineer (we have a about 10 engineers)
- The schedule contains the following fields:
INT | INT | INT | INT | NVARCHAR(1024) | NVARCHAR(64) | BIT | BIT | DATETIME | DATETIME
(In summary: 4x INTs, 2x NVARCHARs, 2x BITs, and 2x DATETIMEs) - The schedule is rarely going to be updated, but it can be updated. The updatable fields are: 2x BITs and 1x DATETIME.
Now looking at the common case scenario:
In a day, it will generates about 1,296,000 records per day.
This is the calculation of common case scenario:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 8,640 * 5 * 30 = 1,296,000 records
If I store each schedule as NVARCHAR(MAX) with comma delimited, then the number of records are reduced to only 150 records per day.
Here is the calculation:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows --> stored as NVARCHAR (becomes 1 record)
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 5 * 30 = 150 records
Now, this is the requirement for those schedules:
- The generated schedules can be viewed on the website.
- The schedules is downloaded by the application each day for analysis (analysis is done on local computers).
- The fields (2x BITs) can be updated once the analysis is completed. These fields can be updated by application (after finish analyzing the schedule) or can be updated (manually) by the engineer on the website.
- All generated schedule must be stored for at least 3 months for auditing purposes.
What is your recommendation? Store schedules as table rows OR NVARCHAR(MAX)
sql-server database-design azure-sql-database
New contributor
I have posted this question to stackoverflow (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54613295/sql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax) and I was advised to post it here too.
--
I am creating a schedule for our engineer to analyze. The schedules are downloaded each day (automatically by the application on the local machines) and the analysis is done on that local computers.
So, now, I am in this dilemma of storing the schedule in database as table rows or as nvarchar(max).
Here is the requirement
- The schedules are generated each day. Each schedule is accurate to 1 seconds. So, at most, it will contain 86,400 records per schedule.
- In a day, depending on the setting, the system can generate up to 100 schedules per engineer (we have a about 10 engineers)
- The schedule contains the following fields:
INT | INT | INT | INT | NVARCHAR(1024) | NVARCHAR(64) | BIT | BIT | DATETIME | DATETIME
(In summary: 4x INTs, 2x NVARCHARs, 2x BITs, and 2x DATETIMEs) - The schedule is rarely going to be updated, but it can be updated. The updatable fields are: 2x BITs and 1x DATETIME.
Now looking at the common case scenario:
In a day, it will generates about 1,296,000 records per day.
This is the calculation of common case scenario:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 8,640 * 5 * 30 = 1,296,000 records
If I store each schedule as NVARCHAR(MAX) with comma delimited, then the number of records are reduced to only 150 records per day.
Here is the calculation:
- 10 seconds accuracy per schedule = 8,640 rows --> stored as NVARCHAR (becomes 1 record)
- 5 engineers run the scheduler each day
- Each engineer generates about 30 schedules
So total is: 5 * 30 = 150 records
Now, this is the requirement for those schedules:
- The generated schedules can be viewed on the website.
- The schedules is downloaded by the application each day for analysis (analysis is done on local computers).
- The fields (2x BITs) can be updated once the analysis is completed. These fields can be updated by application (after finish analyzing the schedule) or can be updated (manually) by the engineer on the website.
- All generated schedule must be stored for at least 3 months for auditing purposes.
What is your recommendation? Store schedules as table rows OR NVARCHAR(MAX)
sql-server database-design azure-sql-database
sql-server database-design azure-sql-database
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 mins ago
SamSam
101
101
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229332%2fsql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229332%2fsql-server-design-question-stored-records-as-rows-vs-as-blob-nvarcharmax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown