Can a TTL LS device (low-power Schottky) serve as an input to a basic TTL device?












1












$begingroup$


A 74121 (One-shot) worked well as a reset to a counter device. There is an enable line using a 7400 NAND gate to allow or disallow the trigger to pass.



While duplicating the circuit, I found that all I have at the moment is a 74LS00. Are the outputs from the low-power Schottky devices compatible with a non-LS input?





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






ttl schottky







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    3 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


A 74121 (One-shot) worked well as a reset to a counter device. There is an enable line using a 7400 NAND gate to allow or disallow the trigger to pass.



While duplicating the circuit, I found that all I have at the moment is a 74LS00. Are the outputs from the low-power Schottky devices compatible with a non-LS input?





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






ttl schottky







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    3 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


A 74121 (One-shot) worked well as a reset to a counter device. There is an enable line using a 7400 NAND gate to allow or disallow the trigger to pass.



While duplicating the circuit, I found that all I have at the moment is a 74LS00. Are the outputs from the low-power Schottky devices compatible with a non-LS input?





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






ttl schottky







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




A 74121 (One-shot) worked well as a reset to a counter device. There is an enable line using a 7400 NAND gate to allow or disallow the trigger to pass.



While duplicating the circuit, I found that all I have at the moment is a 74LS00. Are the outputs from the low-power Schottky devices compatible with a non-LS input?





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






ttl schottky




ttl schottky






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









Rich ShealerRich Shealer

1086




1086












  • $begingroup$
    Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
    $endgroup$
    – analogsystemsrf
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Either use a ground-grid or a ground plane.
$endgroup$
– analogsystemsrf
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

For the circuit as shown, yes. According to my late-70's databook, 74LS parts have an output current of 400$mu$A at 2.5V out, while 7400-series logic has an input current of 40$mu$A (the similar rating for 74LS logic is 20$mu$A). You certainly can't drive as many 74xx inputs from a 74LSxx output as you can from a 74xx output, but just as certainly you can drive one.



I was going to check the fan-out ratings of 74LSxx logic, but as I was turning to the paper book I realized that it didn't have a search bar, and desisted.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
    $endgroup$
    – WhatRoughBeast
    5 hours ago



















0












$begingroup$

That will work as you have shown. But of course, there are many other options .



The 74121 already has 3 inputs two low and one hi, you seem to need two hi. 74LS can easily five units of 74’



TTL was always active low as it was the lowest power and lowest driver impedance mode for NPN driver switches, and this resulted is the fastest RC=T slew rate. Each and every TTL family had a fan out drive load of 10 units and most inputs were 1 unit in the same family. Thus the current drive was always asymmetric with the actual threshold voltage always being 2 diode or Vbe drops for every family, 74’,74F’,74S’,74LS’, and 74L’. Power consumption and speed is the tradeoff for uA/mA per “10 units for each family. Thus to use one family with another, there were standard conversion factors just like currency using fixed ratios for current yet all have the same voltage threshold.



When CMOS came along since they used almost no DC input current, and were forced to have matched symmetrical Nch/Pch drivers to minimize and limit shoot thru current the input threshold was always Vdc/2 but for some applications the choice to use 74HCT’ optimized the TTL asymmetrical Voltage/current levels for best noise immunity.



It is widely known by old-timer EE’s that the TTL asymmetric V/I and threshold provided optimal symmetric noise power immunity although every chip needed a decoupling cap vs 1 in 10 for the high voltage high impedance 4000 series <350 Ohms. Unlike 74ALVC’ which have 25 ohm impedance drivers which switch faster and draw more current but in much short time, benefit from a small cap 0.01 uF per IC if there are many IC contributing to conducted noise.



All 40 or so variations in logic families follow de facto standards for impedance , Vcc or Vdc range and minimum speed.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f421430%2fcan-a-ttl-ls-device-low-power-schottky-serve-as-an-input-to-a-basic-ttl-device%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    For the circuit as shown, yes. According to my late-70's databook, 74LS parts have an output current of 400$mu$A at 2.5V out, while 7400-series logic has an input current of 40$mu$A (the similar rating for 74LS logic is 20$mu$A). You certainly can't drive as many 74xx inputs from a 74LSxx output as you can from a 74xx output, but just as certainly you can drive one.



    I was going to check the fan-out ratings of 74LSxx logic, but as I was turning to the paper book I realized that it didn't have a search bar, and desisted.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
      $endgroup$
      – WhatRoughBeast
      5 hours ago
















    4












    $begingroup$

    For the circuit as shown, yes. According to my late-70's databook, 74LS parts have an output current of 400$mu$A at 2.5V out, while 7400-series logic has an input current of 40$mu$A (the similar rating for 74LS logic is 20$mu$A). You certainly can't drive as many 74xx inputs from a 74LSxx output as you can from a 74xx output, but just as certainly you can drive one.



    I was going to check the fan-out ratings of 74LSxx logic, but as I was turning to the paper book I realized that it didn't have a search bar, and desisted.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
      $endgroup$
      – WhatRoughBeast
      5 hours ago














    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    For the circuit as shown, yes. According to my late-70's databook, 74LS parts have an output current of 400$mu$A at 2.5V out, while 7400-series logic has an input current of 40$mu$A (the similar rating for 74LS logic is 20$mu$A). You certainly can't drive as many 74xx inputs from a 74LSxx output as you can from a 74xx output, but just as certainly you can drive one.



    I was going to check the fan-out ratings of 74LSxx logic, but as I was turning to the paper book I realized that it didn't have a search bar, and desisted.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    For the circuit as shown, yes. According to my late-70's databook, 74LS parts have an output current of 400$mu$A at 2.5V out, while 7400-series logic has an input current of 40$mu$A (the similar rating for 74LS logic is 20$mu$A). You certainly can't drive as many 74xx inputs from a 74LSxx output as you can from a 74xx output, but just as certainly you can drive one.



    I was going to check the fan-out ratings of 74LSxx logic, but as I was turning to the paper book I realized that it didn't have a search bar, and desisted.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 5 hours ago









    TimWescottTimWescott

    4,8661313




    4,8661313








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
      $endgroup$
      – WhatRoughBeast
      5 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
      $endgroup$
      – WhatRoughBeast
      5 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
    $endgroup$
    – WhatRoughBeast
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Agreed. 74LS was specifically designed for interface compatibility. Fanout is the only issue.
    $endgroup$
    – WhatRoughBeast
    5 hours ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    That will work as you have shown. But of course, there are many other options .



    The 74121 already has 3 inputs two low and one hi, you seem to need two hi. 74LS can easily five units of 74’



    TTL was always active low as it was the lowest power and lowest driver impedance mode for NPN driver switches, and this resulted is the fastest RC=T slew rate. Each and every TTL family had a fan out drive load of 10 units and most inputs were 1 unit in the same family. Thus the current drive was always asymmetric with the actual threshold voltage always being 2 diode or Vbe drops for every family, 74’,74F’,74S’,74LS’, and 74L’. Power consumption and speed is the tradeoff for uA/mA per “10 units for each family. Thus to use one family with another, there were standard conversion factors just like currency using fixed ratios for current yet all have the same voltage threshold.



    When CMOS came along since they used almost no DC input current, and were forced to have matched symmetrical Nch/Pch drivers to minimize and limit shoot thru current the input threshold was always Vdc/2 but for some applications the choice to use 74HCT’ optimized the TTL asymmetrical Voltage/current levels for best noise immunity.



    It is widely known by old-timer EE’s that the TTL asymmetric V/I and threshold provided optimal symmetric noise power immunity although every chip needed a decoupling cap vs 1 in 10 for the high voltage high impedance 4000 series <350 Ohms. Unlike 74ALVC’ which have 25 ohm impedance drivers which switch faster and draw more current but in much short time, benefit from a small cap 0.01 uF per IC if there are many IC contributing to conducted noise.



    All 40 or so variations in logic families follow de facto standards for impedance , Vcc or Vdc range and minimum speed.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      That will work as you have shown. But of course, there are many other options .



      The 74121 already has 3 inputs two low and one hi, you seem to need two hi. 74LS can easily five units of 74’



      TTL was always active low as it was the lowest power and lowest driver impedance mode for NPN driver switches, and this resulted is the fastest RC=T slew rate. Each and every TTL family had a fan out drive load of 10 units and most inputs were 1 unit in the same family. Thus the current drive was always asymmetric with the actual threshold voltage always being 2 diode or Vbe drops for every family, 74’,74F’,74S’,74LS’, and 74L’. Power consumption and speed is the tradeoff for uA/mA per “10 units for each family. Thus to use one family with another, there were standard conversion factors just like currency using fixed ratios for current yet all have the same voltage threshold.



      When CMOS came along since they used almost no DC input current, and were forced to have matched symmetrical Nch/Pch drivers to minimize and limit shoot thru current the input threshold was always Vdc/2 but for some applications the choice to use 74HCT’ optimized the TTL asymmetrical Voltage/current levels for best noise immunity.



      It is widely known by old-timer EE’s that the TTL asymmetric V/I and threshold provided optimal symmetric noise power immunity although every chip needed a decoupling cap vs 1 in 10 for the high voltage high impedance 4000 series <350 Ohms. Unlike 74ALVC’ which have 25 ohm impedance drivers which switch faster and draw more current but in much short time, benefit from a small cap 0.01 uF per IC if there are many IC contributing to conducted noise.



      All 40 or so variations in logic families follow de facto standards for impedance , Vcc or Vdc range and minimum speed.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        That will work as you have shown. But of course, there are many other options .



        The 74121 already has 3 inputs two low and one hi, you seem to need two hi. 74LS can easily five units of 74’



        TTL was always active low as it was the lowest power and lowest driver impedance mode for NPN driver switches, and this resulted is the fastest RC=T slew rate. Each and every TTL family had a fan out drive load of 10 units and most inputs were 1 unit in the same family. Thus the current drive was always asymmetric with the actual threshold voltage always being 2 diode or Vbe drops for every family, 74’,74F’,74S’,74LS’, and 74L’. Power consumption and speed is the tradeoff for uA/mA per “10 units for each family. Thus to use one family with another, there were standard conversion factors just like currency using fixed ratios for current yet all have the same voltage threshold.



        When CMOS came along since they used almost no DC input current, and were forced to have matched symmetrical Nch/Pch drivers to minimize and limit shoot thru current the input threshold was always Vdc/2 but for some applications the choice to use 74HCT’ optimized the TTL asymmetrical Voltage/current levels for best noise immunity.



        It is widely known by old-timer EE’s that the TTL asymmetric V/I and threshold provided optimal symmetric noise power immunity although every chip needed a decoupling cap vs 1 in 10 for the high voltage high impedance 4000 series <350 Ohms. Unlike 74ALVC’ which have 25 ohm impedance drivers which switch faster and draw more current but in much short time, benefit from a small cap 0.01 uF per IC if there are many IC contributing to conducted noise.



        All 40 or so variations in logic families follow de facto standards for impedance , Vcc or Vdc range and minimum speed.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        That will work as you have shown. But of course, there are many other options .



        The 74121 already has 3 inputs two low and one hi, you seem to need two hi. 74LS can easily five units of 74’



        TTL was always active low as it was the lowest power and lowest driver impedance mode for NPN driver switches, and this resulted is the fastest RC=T slew rate. Each and every TTL family had a fan out drive load of 10 units and most inputs were 1 unit in the same family. Thus the current drive was always asymmetric with the actual threshold voltage always being 2 diode or Vbe drops for every family, 74’,74F’,74S’,74LS’, and 74L’. Power consumption and speed is the tradeoff for uA/mA per “10 units for each family. Thus to use one family with another, there were standard conversion factors just like currency using fixed ratios for current yet all have the same voltage threshold.



        When CMOS came along since they used almost no DC input current, and were forced to have matched symmetrical Nch/Pch drivers to minimize and limit shoot thru current the input threshold was always Vdc/2 but for some applications the choice to use 74HCT’ optimized the TTL asymmetrical Voltage/current levels for best noise immunity.



        It is widely known by old-timer EE’s that the TTL asymmetric V/I and threshold provided optimal symmetric noise power immunity although every chip needed a decoupling cap vs 1 in 10 for the high voltage high impedance 4000 series <350 Ohms. Unlike 74ALVC’ which have 25 ohm impedance drivers which switch faster and draw more current but in much short time, benefit from a small cap 0.01 uF per IC if there are many IC contributing to conducted noise.



        All 40 or so variations in logic families follow de facto standards for impedance , Vcc or Vdc range and minimum speed.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 58 mins ago

























        answered 5 hours ago









        Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

        66k22396




        66k22396






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f421430%2fcan-a-ttl-ls-device-low-power-schottky-serve-as-an-input-to-a-basic-ttl-device%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

            Image
            In der Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland sind alle denkmalgeschützten Bauten der Stadt Friedland (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) und ihrer Ortsteile aufgelistet. Grundlage ist die Veröffentlichung der Denkmalliste des Landkreises Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (Auszug) vom 28. September 2016. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen 1.1 Friedland 1.2 Bresewitz 1.3 Brohm 1.4 Cosa 1.5 Dishley 1.6 Dishley-Ausbau 1.7 Eichhorst 1.8 Glienke 1.9 Heinrichshöh 1.10 Heinrichswalde 1.11 Jatzke 1.12 Jatzke-Meierei 1.13 Liepen 1.14 Ramelow 1.15 Schwanbeck 2 Vorgesehener Denkmalbereich 3 Quelle 4 Weblinks Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen | Friedland | ID Lage Bezeichnung Beschreibung Bild 281 An der Kleinbahn 2 Windmühle mit Umgang 282 Anklamer Straße alter Friedhof mit Portalwand 282 Anklamer Straße drei Erbbegräbnissen und Gräbern u. a. H.A. Riemann 284
            Read more

            Single-Malt-Whisky

            Image
            Fünf verschiedene schottische Single-Malt-Whiskys Als Single-Malt-Whisky oder kürzer Single Malt werden Whiskys bezeichnet, die zwei besondere Bedingungen erfüllen: Sie stammen zum ersten aus einer einzigen Brennerei, sind also kein Verschnitt aus mehreren Whiskysorten (daher Single , deutsch: einzeln). Zum zweiten wird als Getreide ausschließlich gemälzte Gerste verwendet (deswegen Malt , deutsch: Malz). Der Zusatz Single Malt wird als Prädikat verstanden, die so ausgezeichneten Whiskys sind in aller Regel besonders hochwertig. Hinzu kommt ihre besonders lange Lagerung, die Reifungszeit währt oft ein Jahrzehnt und länger. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Allgemeines 2 Herkunftsländer 2.1 Schottland 2.2 Irland 2.3 Japan 2.4 Kontinentaleuropa 3 Produktionsschritte 3.1 Mälzen 3.2 Brauen 3.3 Brennen 3.4 Reifung und Finish 3.5 Abfüllung 4 Altersangaben 5 Lagerung von Whiskyflaschen 6 Geschmacksklassifikation 7 Sonstig
            Read more

            Czorneboh

            Image
            Dieser Artikel erläutert den Berg Czorneboh, für die Gottheit siehe Czorneboh (Gottheit). Czorneboh Čornobóh Berggasthof mit Turm Höhe 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] Lage Freistaat Sachsen, Deutschland Gebirge Lausitzer Bergland Dominanz 15,4 km →  Kottmar Koordinaten 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O 51.119722222222 14.525194444444 555.7 Koordinaten: 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O Gestein Granodiorit Besonderheiten Aussichtsturm Czorneboh Der Czorneboh , obersorbisch Čornobóh , ist ein Berg zwischen Hochkirch und Cunewalde in der Oberlausitz. Er gehört zu der südöstlich von Bautzen gelegenen Czorneboh-Bergkette und ist mit einer Höhe von 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] der höchste Punkt dieses Ausläufers des Lausitzer Berglandes. Er leitet als Landschaftselement die wellige Granitlandschaft der Lausitzer Vorbergzone ein. Der Gipfel des Czorneboh liegt in der Gemarkung Meschwitz (Gemeinde Hochkirch), die Czornebohbaude jedoch
            Read more