Is it a Cyclops number? “Nobody” knows!












1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    53 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    50 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    33 mins ago
















1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    53 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    50 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    33 mins ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary




code-golf number decision-problem binary






share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 29 mins ago







Tau













New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









TauTau

1165




1165




New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    53 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    50 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    33 mins ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    53 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    50 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    33 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
53 mins ago




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
53 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
50 mins ago




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
50 mins ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
33 mins ago




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
33 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



¢èT ¶1©¢ês


That's more like it...



Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



Try it online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    3 mins ago





















2












$begingroup$

Japt, 8 bytes



¤øT ©¢ês


Based off of Quintec's solution.



Try it Online!



Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



Try it Online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    28 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Update: found shorter way :)
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    19 mins ago



















0












$begingroup$


Perl 6, 23 bytes





{.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


Try it online!



Regex based solution






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$


    JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





    f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


    Try it online!



    This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





    JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





    p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "200"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        3 mins ago


















      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        3 mins ago
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 22 mins ago

























      answered 47 mins ago









      QuintecQuintec

      1,9781726




      1,9781726












      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        3 mins ago




















      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        3 mins ago


















      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      3 mins ago






      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      3 mins ago













      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        19 mins ago
















      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        19 mins ago














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 3 mins ago

























      answered 31 mins ago









      Embodiment of IgnoranceEmbodiment of Ignorance

      1,516123




      1,516123












      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        19 mins ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        28 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        19 mins ago
















      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      28 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      28 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      28 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      28 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      19 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      19 mins ago











      0












      $begingroup$


      Perl 6, 23 bytes





      {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


      Try it online!



      Regex based solution






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$


        Perl 6, 23 bytes





        {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


        Try it online!



        Regex based solution






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$


          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 24 mins ago









          Jo KingJo King

          24.4k357126




          24.4k357126























              0












              $begingroup$


              JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





              f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


              Try it online!



              This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





              JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





              p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$


                JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                Try it online!



                This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$


                  JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                  Try it online!



                  This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$




                  JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                  Try it online!



                  This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 9 mins ago

























                  answered 22 mins ago









                  tshtsh

                  9,32511652




                  9,32511652






















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      If this is an answer to a challenge…




                      • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                      • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                        Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                      • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                      More generally…




                      • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                      • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

                      Image
                      In der Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland sind alle denkmalgeschützten Bauten der Stadt Friedland (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) und ihrer Ortsteile aufgelistet. Grundlage ist die Veröffentlichung der Denkmalliste des Landkreises Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (Auszug) vom 28. September 2016. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen 1.1 Friedland 1.2 Bresewitz 1.3 Brohm 1.4 Cosa 1.5 Dishley 1.6 Dishley-Ausbau 1.7 Eichhorst 1.8 Glienke 1.9 Heinrichshöh 1.10 Heinrichswalde 1.11 Jatzke 1.12 Jatzke-Meierei 1.13 Liepen 1.14 Ramelow 1.15 Schwanbeck 2 Vorgesehener Denkmalbereich 3 Quelle 4 Weblinks Baudenkmale nach Ortsteilen | Friedland | ID Lage Bezeichnung Beschreibung Bild 281 An der Kleinbahn 2 Windmühle mit Umgang 282 Anklamer Straße alter Friedhof mit Portalwand 282 Anklamer Straße drei Erbbegräbnissen und Gräbern u. a. H.A. Riemann 284
                      Read more

                      Single-Malt-Whisky

                      Image
                      Fünf verschiedene schottische Single-Malt-Whiskys Als Single-Malt-Whisky oder kürzer Single Malt werden Whiskys bezeichnet, die zwei besondere Bedingungen erfüllen: Sie stammen zum ersten aus einer einzigen Brennerei, sind also kein Verschnitt aus mehreren Whiskysorten (daher Single , deutsch: einzeln). Zum zweiten wird als Getreide ausschließlich gemälzte Gerste verwendet (deswegen Malt , deutsch: Malz). Der Zusatz Single Malt wird als Prädikat verstanden, die so ausgezeichneten Whiskys sind in aller Regel besonders hochwertig. Hinzu kommt ihre besonders lange Lagerung, die Reifungszeit währt oft ein Jahrzehnt und länger. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Allgemeines 2 Herkunftsländer 2.1 Schottland 2.2 Irland 2.3 Japan 2.4 Kontinentaleuropa 3 Produktionsschritte 3.1 Mälzen 3.2 Brauen 3.3 Brennen 3.4 Reifung und Finish 3.5 Abfüllung 4 Altersangaben 5 Lagerung von Whiskyflaschen 6 Geschmacksklassifikation 7 Sonstig
                      Read more

                      Czorneboh

                      Image
                      Dieser Artikel erläutert den Berg Czorneboh, für die Gottheit siehe Czorneboh (Gottheit). Czorneboh Čornobóh Berggasthof mit Turm Höhe 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] Lage Freistaat Sachsen, Deutschland Gebirge Lausitzer Bergland Dominanz 15,4 km →  Kottmar Koordinaten 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O 51.119722222222 14.525194444444 555.7 Koordinaten: 51° 7′ 11″  N , 14° 31′ 31″  O Gestein Granodiorit Besonderheiten Aussichtsturm Czorneboh Der Czorneboh , obersorbisch Čornobóh , ist ein Berg zwischen Hochkirch und Cunewalde in der Oberlausitz. Er gehört zu der südöstlich von Bautzen gelegenen Czorneboh-Bergkette und ist mit einer Höhe von 555,7  m ü. NHN [1] der höchste Punkt dieses Ausläufers des Lausitzer Berglandes. Er leitet als Landschaftselement die wellige Granitlandschaft der Lausitzer Vorbergzone ein. Der Gipfel des Czorneboh liegt in der Gemarkung Meschwitz (Gemeinde Hochkirch), die Czornebohbaude jedoch
                      Read more