RM anova or Factorial Anova?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


I have an intervention in a group of schools. I think I need to use RM anova since RM Anova is 1 factor between subjects and other one within subjects (time) while factorial anova is two factors between subjects -is it correct? I have 4 subscales and I have pre and post scores. I want to see if the intervention was effective or not. Also one other question my control group is much smaller than my intervention group due to availability. Thanks for your advice.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have an intervention in a group of schools. I think I need to use RM anova since RM Anova is 1 factor between subjects and other one within subjects (time) while factorial anova is two factors between subjects -is it correct? I have 4 subscales and I have pre and post scores. I want to see if the intervention was effective or not. Also one other question my control group is much smaller than my intervention group due to availability. Thanks for your advice.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I have an intervention in a group of schools. I think I need to use RM anova since RM Anova is 1 factor between subjects and other one within subjects (time) while factorial anova is two factors between subjects -is it correct? I have 4 subscales and I have pre and post scores. I want to see if the intervention was effective or not. Also one other question my control group is much smaller than my intervention group due to availability. Thanks for your advice.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I have an intervention in a group of schools. I think I need to use RM anova since RM Anova is 1 factor between subjects and other one within subjects (time) while factorial anova is two factors between subjects -is it correct? I have 4 subscales and I have pre and post scores. I want to see if the intervention was effective or not. Also one other question my control group is much smaller than my intervention group due to availability. Thanks for your advice.







      anova






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      joanmillerjoanmiller

      61




      61




      New contributor




      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      joanmiller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You certainly need to account for the dependence of the data, so regular ANOVA is not an option. However, RM-ANOVA makes assumptions that are rarely met in repeated measures - in particular, it assumes sphericity.



          It would probably be better to use a multilevel model. These make fewer assumptions.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            joanmiller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404375%2frm-anova-or-factorial-anova%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            You certainly need to account for the dependence of the data, so regular ANOVA is not an option. However, RM-ANOVA makes assumptions that are rarely met in repeated measures - in particular, it assumes sphericity.



            It would probably be better to use a multilevel model. These make fewer assumptions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              You certainly need to account for the dependence of the data, so regular ANOVA is not an option. However, RM-ANOVA makes assumptions that are rarely met in repeated measures - in particular, it assumes sphericity.



              It would probably be better to use a multilevel model. These make fewer assumptions.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                You certainly need to account for the dependence of the data, so regular ANOVA is not an option. However, RM-ANOVA makes assumptions that are rarely met in repeated measures - in particular, it assumes sphericity.



                It would probably be better to use a multilevel model. These make fewer assumptions.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                You certainly need to account for the dependence of the data, so regular ANOVA is not an option. However, RM-ANOVA makes assumptions that are rarely met in repeated measures - in particular, it assumes sphericity.



                It would probably be better to use a multilevel model. These make fewer assumptions.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 25 mins ago









                Peter FlomPeter Flom

                77.8k12110219




                77.8k12110219






















                    joanmiller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    joanmiller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    joanmiller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    joanmiller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404375%2frm-anova-or-factorial-anova%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Liste der Baudenkmale in Friedland (Mecklenburg)

                    Single-Malt-Whisky

                    Czorneboh